Stable multi-level social structure is maintained by habitat geometry in a wild bird population

Social structure can have profound evolutionary and ecological implications for animal populations. Structure can arise and be maintained via social preferences or be indirectly shaped by habitat structure. Understanding how social structure emerges is important for understanding the potential links between social structure and evolutionary and ecological processes. Here, we study a large community of wild birds fitted with uniquely-coded passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags and recorded on a grid of automated feeders fitted with radio frequency identification (RFID) antennae. We show that both large-scale and fine-scale network communities are consistent across years in this population, despite high generational turn-over. Studying the process that generates community structure, here the movement of individual birds across the woodland, suggests an important role of habitat geometry in shaping population-level social community structure. Our study highlights how relatively simple factors can produce apparent emergent social structure at the population scale, which has widespread implications for understanding eco-evolutionary dynamics.

[1]  D. Farine,et al.  Diurnal variation in the production of vocal information about food supports a model of social adjustment in wild songbirds , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[2]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  The role of habitat configuration in shaping social structure: a gap in studies of animal social complexity , 2019, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  Mark A. Hurley,et al.  Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals , 2018, Science.

[4]  Pierre-Olivier Montiglio,et al.  Social structure modulates the evolutionary consequences of social plasticity: A social network perspective on interacting phenotypes , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[5]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Association indices for quantifying social relationships: how to deal with missing observations of individuals or groups , 2017, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  J. Slate,et al.  Social and spatial effects on genetic variation between foraging flocks in a wild bird population , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[7]  X. Qi,et al.  Multilevel societies , 2017, Current Biology.

[8]  Damien R Farine,et al.  A guide to null models for animal social network analysis , 2017, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[9]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  Habitat and social factors shape individual decisions and emergent group structure during baboon collective movement , 2016, eLife.

[10]  K. Gaston,et al.  Movement of feeder-using songbirds: the influence of urban features , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Josh A. Firth,et al.  Social carry‐over effects underpin trans‐seasonally linked structure in a wild bird population , 2016, Ecology letters.

[12]  Robin Freeman,et al.  Emerging Network-Based Tools in Movement Ecology. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Measuring the robustness of network community structure using assortativity , 2016, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Environment modulates population social structure: experimental evidence from replicated social networks of wild lizards , 2016, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Edzer Pebesma,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Interpolation using gstat , 2016, R J..

[16]  B. Voelkl,et al.  Consistent individual differences in the social phenotypes of wild great tits, Parus major , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  From Individuals to Groups and Back: The Evolutionary Implications of Group Phenotypic Composition , 2015, Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

[18]  Damien R Farine,et al.  Feeder use predicts both acquisition and transmission of a contagious pathogen in a North American songbird , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Lauren G. Shoemaker,et al.  Multilevel animal societies can emerge from cultural transmission , 2015, Nature Communications.

[20]  Iris I. Levin,et al.  Performance of Encounternet Tags: Field Tests of Miniaturized Proximity Loggers for Use on Small Birds , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[22]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Proximity as a proxy for interactions: issues of scale in social network analysis , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  I. Couzin,et al.  Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , 2015, Science.

[24]  R. Kays,et al.  Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet , 2015, Science.

[25]  C. Garroway,et al.  Reproductive consequences of the timing of seasonal movements in a nonmigratory wild bird population , 2015 .

[26]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  The role of social and ecological processes in structuring animal populations: a case study from automated tracking of wild birds , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[27]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Inferring social structure from temporal data , 2015, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  William Hoppitt,et al.  Interspecific social networks promote information transmission in wild songbirds , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  D. Farine,et al.  Selection for territory acquisition is modulated by social network structure in a wild songbird , 2015, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[30]  A. Thornton,et al.  Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds , 2014, Nature.

[31]  Richard James,et al.  Animal Social Networks , 2014 .

[32]  John T. Finn,et al.  Applying network methods to acoustic telemetry data: Modeling the movements of tropical marine fishes , 2014 .

[33]  Keith Kirby,et al.  Changes in the tree and shrub layer of Wytham Woods (Southern England) 1974–2012: local and national trends compared , 2014 .

[34]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  A contact-based social network of lizards is defined by low genetic relatedness among strongly connected individuals , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  Charles J. Goodnight,et al.  Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions , 2014, Nature.

[36]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Collective decision making and social interaction rules in mixed-species flocks of songbirds , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  B. Lyon,et al.  Across-year social stability shapes network structure in wintering migrant sparrows. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[39]  Jens Krause,et al.  The evolutionary and ecological consequences of animal social networks: emerging issues. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  J. Pruitt,et al.  The personality types of key catalytic individuals shape colonies' collective behaviour and success , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Measuring phenotypic assortment in animal social networks: weighted associations are more robust than binary edges , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  Brenda McCowan,et al.  Linking social and pathogen transmission networks using microbial genetics in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis). , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[43]  The early bird gets the worm: foraging strategies of wild songbirds lead to the early discovery of food sources , 2013, Biology Letters.

[44]  D. Helbing,et al.  The Hidden Geometry of Complex, Network-Driven Contagion Phenomena , 2013, Science.

[45]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Animal social network inference and permutations for ecologists in R using asnipe , 2013 .

[46]  A Cockburn,et al.  Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major). , 2013, Ecology letters.

[47]  Christian Rutz,et al.  Reality mining of animal social systems. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  Robert B O'Hara,et al.  Social Learning of Migratory Performance , 2013, Science.

[49]  Tina W. Wey,et al.  Reproductive correlates of social network variation in plurally breeding degus (Octodon degus) , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  Luke Rendell,et al.  Network-Based Diffusion Analysis Reveals Cultural Transmission of Lobtail Feeding in Humpback Whales , 2013, Science.

[51]  Juan De Dios Morales,et al.  Proximity data-loggers increase the quantity and quality of social network data , 2012, Biology Letters.

[52]  Iead Rezek,et al.  Inferring social network structure in ecological systems from spatio-temporal data streams , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[53]  D. Farine,et al.  Social network analysis of mixed-species flocks: exploring the structure and evolution of interspecific social behaviour , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  D. Farine,et al.  Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  Richard James,et al.  Automated mapping of social networks in wild birds , 2012, Current Biology.

[56]  Elaine M. Bettaney,et al.  The role of relatedness in structuring the social network of a wild guppy population , 2012, Oecologia.

[57]  Ikki Matsuda,et al.  Multilevel Societies in Primates and Other Mammals: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2012, International Journal of Primatology.

[58]  H. Whitehead,et al.  Multilevel Societies of Female Sperm Whales (Physeter macrocephalus) in the Atlantic and Pacific: Why Are They So Different? , 2012, International Journal of Primatology.

[59]  R. E. Butterfield,et al.  Fitness consequences of social network position in a wild population of forked fungus beetles (Bolitotherus cornutus) , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[60]  R. Payne,et al.  Personality predicts individual responsiveness to the risks of starvation and predation , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  G. Wittemyer,et al.  A Comparison of Social Organization in Asian Elephants and African Savannah Elephants , 2012, International Journal of Primatology.

[62]  R. E. Butterfield,et al.  PHENOTYPIC ASSORTMENT MEDIATES THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL SELECTION IN A WILD BEETLE POPULATION , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[63]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Scale and state dependence of the relationship between personality and dispersal in a great tit population. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[64]  David N. Bonter,et al.  Applications of radio frequency identification (RFID) in ornithological research: a review , 2011 .

[65]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[66]  Susan E. Riechert,et al.  How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[67]  Stanley M Tomkiewicz,et al.  Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[68]  Graeme D Ruxton,et al.  Interspecific information transfer influences animal community structure. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[69]  Amy L. Schreier,et al.  The fourth level of social structure in a multi‐level society: ecological and social functions of clans in hamadryas baboons , 2009, American journal of primatology.

[70]  Richard James,et al.  Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: patterns and implications , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[71]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[72]  D. Owen THE WINTER WEIGHTS OF TITMICE. , 2008 .

[73]  K. Eames,et al.  Modelling disease spread through random and regular contacts in clustered populations. , 2008, Theoretical population biology.

[74]  Richard James,et al.  Social structure in a colonial mammal: unravelling hidden structural layers and their foundations by network analysis , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[75]  Herbert W. Hethcote,et al.  Mixing patterns between age groups in social networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[76]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Sensitivity of MRQAP Tests to Collinearity and Autocorrelation Conditions , 2007, Psychometrika.

[77]  T. Valone From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[78]  Mikko Mönkkönen,et al.  Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. , 2007, Ecology.

[79]  K. Wiebe,et al.  Learning the ecological niche , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[80]  Andrew Fall,et al.  Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: An application of graph theory , 2006 .

[81]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[82]  Susan C Alberts,et al.  The ties that bind: genetic relatedness predicts the fission and fusion of social groups in wild African elephants , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[83]  W. Getz,et al.  The socioecology of elephants: analysis of the processes creating multitiered social structures , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[84]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[85]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Evolution driven by differential dispersal within a wild bird population , 2005, Nature.

[86]  H. Ford,et al.  A comparison of the social organization of three syntopic species of Australian thornbill, Acanthiza , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[87]  I. Couzin,et al.  Mechanisms underlying shoal composition in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 2003 .

[88]  A. J. Moore,et al.  INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS: I. DIRECT AND INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[89]  J. Wiens Population Responses to Patchy Environments , 1976 .

[90]  R. A. Hinde,et al.  Interactions, Relationships and Social Structure , 1976 .

[91]  Aashish Manglik,et al.  Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , .