An Evaluation of Regression Algorithms Performance for the Chemical Process of Naphthalene Sublimation

Different regression algorithms are applied for predicting the sublimation rate of naphthalene in various working conditions: time, temperature, trainer rate and shape of the sample. The original Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Regression (LMNNR) algorithm is applied and its performance is compared to other well-established regression algorithms, such as support vector regression, multilayer perceptron neural networks, classical k-nearest neighbor, random forest, and others. The experimental results obtained show that the LMNNR algorithm provides better results than the other regression algorithms.

[1]  F. Leon,et al.  Phase equilibrium and physical properties of aqueous mixtures of poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) with trisodium citrate, obtained experimentally and by simulation , 2016 .

[2]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[3]  D. R. Baughman,et al.  Neural Networks in Bioprocessing and Chemical Engineering , 1992 .

[4]  Silvia Curteanu,et al.  Large margin nearest neighbour regression using different optimization techniques , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[5]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[6]  Hiromasa Kaneko,et al.  Adaptive soft sensor based on online support vector regression and Bayesian ensemble learning for various states in chemical plants , 2014 .

[7]  Silvia Curteanu,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithm for Large Margin Nearest Neighbour Regression , 2015, ICCCI.

[8]  M. Ghaedi,et al.  Application of least squares support vector regression and linear multiple regression for modeling removal of methyl orange onto tin oxide nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon and activated carbon prepared from Pistacia atlantica wood. , 2016, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[9]  F. Leon,et al.  Naphthalene sublimation. Experiment and optimisation based on neuro-evolutionary methodology , 2014 .

[10]  John B. O. Mitchell,et al.  Are the Sublimation Thermodynamics of Organic Molecules Predictable? , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  A. Tabernero,et al.  On the use of semiempirical models of (solid + supercritical fluid) systems to determine solid sublimation properties , 2011 .

[12]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Distance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification , 2005, NIPS.

[13]  Silvia Curteanu,et al.  Experimental analysis and mathematical prediction of Cd(II) removal by biosorption using support vector machines and genetic algorithms. , 2015, New biotechnology.

[14]  D. Mareci,et al.  Prediction of Corrosion Resistance of Some Dental Metallic Materials with an Adaptive Regression Model , 2015 .

[15]  Silvia Curteanu,et al.  Performance Comparison of Different Regression Methods for a Polymerization Process with Adaptive Sampling , 2016 .

[16]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[17]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[18]  V. Sugumaran,et al.  Tool condition monitoring using K-star algorithm , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Zhi-huan Song,et al.  Locally Weighted Kernel Principal Component Regression Model for Soft Sensing of Nonlinear Time-Variant Processes , 2014 .

[20]  John G. Cleary,et al.  K*: An Instance-based Learner Using and Entropic Distance Measure , 1995, ICML.

[21]  D. Bui,et al.  A comparative assessment of support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests for predicting and mapping soil organic carbon stocks across an Afromontane landscape. , 2015 .

[22]  Zhiqiang Ge,et al.  Probabilistic combination of local independent component regression model for multimode quality prediction in chemical processes , 2014 .