Tourist information search

Abstract Is it appropriate to segment the leisure tourism market on the basis of consumer information search behaviors? The present study examines this question by contrasting two approaches to segmenting this market: post hoc and a priori . Using behavioral data collected in a survey of 585 auto travelers to Florida, analyses demonstrated that information search behavior is meaningfully related to systematic tourism behavior; information search and tourism context are the result of a number of situational, tourist, and marketplace contingencies; information search is associated with managerially-relevant tourism outcomes; and an a priori operationalization of information search is a more appropriate approach to segmentation on a number of criteria.

[1]  Dale Fodness.  Measuring tourist motivation. , 1994 .

[2]  R. A. Chadwick,et al.  Concepts, definitions and measures used in travel and tourism research. , 1987 .

[3]  A. Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[4]  K. Clancy,et al.  TOWARD AN OPTIMAL MARKET TARGET: A STRATEGY FOR MARKET SEGMENTATION , 1984 .

[5]  Yoram Wind,et al.  Issues and Advances in Segmentation Research , 1978 .

[6]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Tourism: Principles, Practices, Philosophies , 1990 .

[7]  R. Wilkes.  Household Life-Cycle Stages, Transitions, and Product Expenditures , 1995 .

[8]  Michael J. Etzel,et al.  The Use Of Requested Promotional Material By Pleasure Travelers , 1985 .

[9]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Vacation travel planning segments: Self-planning vs. users of motor club and travel agents , 1980 .

[10]  K. W. Kendall,et al.  Consumer Perceptions Of Travel Agencies: Communications, Images, Needs, And Expectations , 1989 .

[11]  D. Snepenger,et al.  Information Search Strategies B y Destination-Naive Tourists , 1990 .

[12]  W. Fred van Raaij,et al.  Consumer research on tourism: mental and behavioral constructs. , 1986 .

[13]  Russell I. Haley.  Benefit Segmentation: A Decision-oriented Research Tool , 1968 .

[14]  L. Moutinho.  Consumer Behaviour in Tourism , 1987 .

[15]  Russell I. Haley.  BENEFIT SEGMENTATION –20 YEARS LATER , 1984 .

[16]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Segment Congruence Analysis: A Method for Analyzing Association Among Alternative Bases for Market , 1977 .

[17]  R. L. Jenkins.  Family Vacation Decision-Making , 1978 .

[18]  Richard R. Perdue,et al.  Segmenting State Travel Information Inquirers by Timing of the Destination Decision and Previous Experience , 1985 .

[19]  J. R. Brent Ritchie,et al.  Joint Purchasing Decisions: A Comparison of Influence Structure in Family and Couple Decision-Making Units , 1980 .

[20]  J.S. Perry Hobson,et al.  Tourism and Politics: , 1994 .

[21]  K. Raitz,et al.  A Note About Information Sources for Preferred Recreational Environments , 1989 .

[22]  P. Schul,et al.  Search Behavior of International Vacationers: Travel-Specific Lifiestyle and Sociodemographic Variables , 1983 .

[23]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[24]  Dennis R. Howard,et al.  An Analysis Of The Differences Between State Welcome Center Users And Nonusers: A Profile Of Oregon Vacationers , 1989 .

[25]  Marshall G. Greenberg,et al.  Successful Needs/Benefits Segmentation: A User′s Guide , 1989 .

[26]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations , 1976 .

[27]  Richard R. Perdue,et al.  Evaluating the Role of State Welcome Centers in Disseminating Travel Related Information in North Carolina , 1987 .

[28]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .