Seismic design provisions estimate the maximum roof and story drifts occurring in major earthquakes by amplifying the drifts computed from elastic analysis at the prescribed design seismic force level with a deflection amplification factor (DAF). A comparison of several seismic design provisions indicated that the deflection amplification factor in both the UBC and NEHRP Recommended Provisions, being equal to 3Rw/8 and Cd, respectively, is very low and could lead to unconservative drift estimations. An analytical study of the seismic responses of four instrumented buildings confirmed that drifts developed in major earthquakes are much higher than those predicted by the UBC or NEHRP approach. It is recommended that the deflection amplification factor be increased to at least the seismic force reduction factor (Rw in UBC and R in NEHRP) for estimating maximum drifts. The effects of the ratio between building period and earthquake predominant period, types of yield mechanisms, and structural overstrength on ...
[1]
Chia-Ming Uang.
An Evaluation of Two-Level Seismic Design Procedure
,
1993
.
[2]
R. Go´mez,et al.
The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985—Seismic Design Regulations of the 1976 Mexico Building Code
,
1988
.
[3]
Chia-Ming Uang,et al.
Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd Factors for Building Seismic Provisions
,
1991
.
[4]
A. Shakal,et al.
CSMIP (California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program) strong-motion records from the Santa Cruz Mountains (Loma Prieta), California earthquake of 17 October 1989
,
1990
.
[5]
Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.
Uncertainties in Establishing Design Earthquakes
,
1987
.
[6]
T. Takeda,et al.
Reinforced Concrete response to simulated earthquakes
,
1970
.
[7]
A. Wada,et al.
SEISMIC DRIFT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
,
1993
.