The efficacy, effectiveness and safety of SARS-CoV-2 disinfection methods (including ozone machines) in educational settings for children and young people

While evidence for the importance of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from contaminated surfaces is limited, ozone disinfection methods have been considered for surface cleaning as a response to stopping the spread of the virus in educational settings. This rapid evidence summary aimed to search the available literature and summarise findings on the surface survival of SARS-CoV-2, efficacy and effectiveness of ozone machines against SARS-CoV-2, and benefits and harms caused by using these cleaning technologies, including their impact on health. Alternative cleaning technologies, such as light-based technologies and hydrogen peroxide vapour, were also investigated. Findings indicate that gaseous ozone can inactivate different bacteria and viruses, although there is a lack of direct evidence investigating the effect of these cleaning methods on SARS-CoV-2 in real-world settings, specifically in schools. However, regarding harm, ozone is a highly reactive oxidising agent, and high concentrations can contribute to decay of building materials, and health issues (mainly respiratory) by direct exposure or by-product formation. Therefore, leading environmental health organisations do not recommend the use of ozone cleaning technologies in real-world settings, such as schools. Research and policy focus may need to shift towards other interventions that could help reduce transmission, and consequently minimise disruption to education.

[1]  C. Signorelli,et al.  The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review , 2021, Journal of Hospital Infection.

[2]  C. Mallen,et al.  Methods to disinfect and decontaminate SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of in vitro studies , 2021, Therapeutic advances in infectious disease.

[3]  Á. Atallah,et al.  Environmental cleaning to prevent COVID-19 infection. A rapid systematic review , 2020, Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina.

[4]  A. Scarano,et al.  Environmental Disinfection of a Dental Clinic during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Insight , 2020, BioMed research international.

[5]  Milad Raeiszadeh,et al.  A Critical Review on Ultraviolet Disinfection Systems against COVID-19 Outbreak: Applicability, Validation, and Safety Considerations , 2020, ACS photonics.

[6]  R. Nakano,et al.  Inactivation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by gaseous ozone treatment , 2020, Journal of Hospital Infection.

[7]  A. Tsou,et al.  No-Touch Modalities for Disinfecting Patient Rooms in Acute Care Settings , 2020 .

[8]  G. Kampf,et al.  Corrigendum to “Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents” [J Hosp Infect 104 (2020) 246–251] , 2020, Journal of Hospital Infection.

[9]  Christian Lingenfelder,et al.  Ultraviolet irradiation doses for coronavirus inactivation – review and analysis of coronavirus photoinactivation studies , 2020, GMS hygiene and infection control.

[10]  G. Kampf,et al.  Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents , 2020, Journal of Hospital Infection.

[11]  D. Zoutman,et al.  Effectiveness of a novel ozone-based system for the rapid high-level disinfection of health care spaces and surfaces. , 2011, American journal of infection control.

[12]  A. Bennett,et al.  Gaseous and air decontamination technologies for Clostridium difficile in the healthcare environment. , 2011, The Journal of hospital infection.

[13]  M. Sharma,et al.  Inactivation of Norovirus by ozone gas in conditions relevant to healthcare. , 2007, The Journal of hospital infection.