Common contextual influences in ambiguous and rivalrous figures
暂无分享,去创建一个
Marouane Ouhnana | Frederick A A Kingdom | Ben J Jennings | F. Kingdom | B. Jennings | Marouane Ouhnana
[1] Thomas C. Toppino,et al. Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[2] D. Alais. Binocular rivalry: competition and inhibition in visual perception. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.
[3] Randolph Blake,et al. How Context Influences Predominance during Binocular Rivalry , 2002, Perception.
[4] W. Levelt,et al. The ‘laws’ of binocular rivalry: 50 years of Levelt’s propositions , 2015, Vision Research.
[5] Thomas C. Toppino,et al. Selective adaptation with reversible figures: Don’t change that channel , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.
[6] Hiroshi Uozato,et al. Effects of Dominant and Nondominant Eyes in Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.
[7] M. Wertheimer. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .
[8] Tomas Knapen,et al. Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[9] R. van Ee,et al. United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[10] R. Lipman,et al. Some Factors Affecting Necker Cube Reversal Rate , 1962, Perceptual and motor skills.
[11] P. Romano. Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. , 2000, Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly.
[12] Max Wertheimer,et al. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt , .
[13] Allan C. Dobbins,et al. Asymmetries in Perception of 3D Orientation , 2010, PloS one.
[14] R. van Ee,et al. Visible and invisible stimulus parts integrate into global object representations as revealed by combining monocular and binocular rivalry. , 2016, Journal of vision.
[15] R. Sundareswara,et al. Perceptual multistability predicted by search model for Bayesian decisions. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[16] Thomas C. Toppino,et al. Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.
[17] N. Logothetis,et al. Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[18] V. Noreika,et al. Interaction of bottom-up and top-down processes in the perception of ambiguous figures , 2013, Vision Research.
[19] J. Saunders,et al. Demonstration of cue recruitment: change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[20] I. Kovács,et al. When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[21] W. Miles. Ocular dominance in human adults. , 1930 .
[22] F. Kingdom,et al. Perceptual-binding in a rotating Necker cube: The effect of context motion and position , 2016, Vision Research.
[23] R. Blake,et al. What is Suppressed during Binocular Rivalry? , 1980, Perception.