Ethical Considerations in Classification Practice: A Case Study Using Creationism and Intelligent Design

This article re-visits a scenario from 1987: a university president required a library director to reclassify some materials into a science classification. The author looks at the prominence of the Code of Ethics of the American Library Association in the general library literature and in classification and cataloging practice literature. The issue of censorship is also discussed. The author then reviews classification for Creationism and Intelligent design and some decision-making processes one could use when deciding on the professional ethics of such a request, concluding that in some cases the ethical action might indeed be to go ahead with the reclassification.

[1]  Sheila A. Bair.  Toward a Code of Ethics for Cataloging , 2005 .

[2]  Clare Beghtol.  Professional Values and Ethics in Knowledge Organization and Cataloging , 2008 .

[3]  Ronald Hagler.  The bibliographic record and information technology: 2nd Edition, by Ronald Hagler, 1991 (Adamantine Press), 331 pp (Hardcover Book, £32.50, ISBN 0744900379 , 1992, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[4]  Karen S Calhoun,et al.  Online catalogs : what users and librarians want , 2009 .

[5]  Haroon Idrees,et al.  Devising a Classification Scheme for Islam: Opinions of LIS and Islamic Studies Scholars , 2009 .

[6]  Martha J. Powell,et al.  The problem of student acceptance of evolution , 2003 .

[7]  Rick Lugg,et al.  Cataloging: how to take a business approach , 2004 .

[8]  Laura Zeigen,et al.  Library Catalogs and Other Discovery Tools , 2009 .

[9]  H A CLEGG,et al.  Professional Ethics , 2018, Professional Ethics and Civic Morals.

[10]  Marcel Ausloos,et al.  Organizational and dynamical aspects of a small network with two distinct communities: Neo-creationists vs. Evolution Defenders , 2008, Scientometrics.

[11]  Robert Hauptman,et al.  Ethical challenges in librarianship , 1988 .

[12]  Lois Mai Chan,et al.  Immroth's guide to the Library of Congress classification , 1980 .

[13]  M. Buckland.  :Self-Examination: The Present and Future of Librarianship , 2009 .

[14]  Anna M. Ferris.  The Ethics and Integrity of Cataloging , 2008 .

[15]  Gretchen L. Hoffman.  Meeting Users’ Needs in Cataloging: What is the Right Thing to Do? , 2009 .

[16]  Rudolf F. Schaeffer.  Delights and Pitfalls of Subject Cataloging. , 1970 .

[17]  Christopher Martyn,et al.  A Short History of Nearly Everything , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Jan Dee Crowe.  Study of the feasibility of indexing a work's subjective viewpoint , 1986 .

[19]  D. Todd,et al.  American Library Association , 2022, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[20]  Seymour Sargent.  Jurgen Habermas and the Ethics of Gatekeeping , 1993 .

[21]  David Bade,et al.  Colorless green ideals in the language of bibliographic description: Making sense and nonsense in libraries , 2007 .

[22]  Clare Beghtol,et al.  Ethical decision-making for knowledge representation and organization systems for global use , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Robert N. Broadus.  The treatment of the field of speech in three library classifications , 1966 .

[24]  Arlene G. Taylor,et al.  The Organization of Information , 1999 .

[25]  Rosann Bazirjian.  The Creation and Persistence of Misinformation in Shared Library Catalogs: Language and Subject Knowledge in a Technological Era , 2003 .

[26]  Diana Woodward.  A Framework for Deciding Issues in Ethics , 1990 .

[27]  Daniel Canncasciato.  Authority and objectivity in a time of transformative growth : the future of the library catalog , 1999 .

[28]  Francis Miksa.  The Development of Classification at the Library of Congress. Occasional Papers, Number 164. , 1984 .

[29]  Steve Johnson.  Introduction to technical services for library technicians , 1982 .

[30]  Alvin M. Schrader,et al.  The Censorship Phenomenon in College and Research Libraries: An Investigation of the Canadian Prairie Provinces, 1980-1985 , 1989 .