Inattentional blindness and augmented‐vision displays: effects of cartoon‐like filtering and attended scene

Augmented‐vision devices that we are developing to aid people with low vision (impaired vision) employ vision multiplexing– the simultaneous presentation of two different views to one or both eyes. This approach enables compensation for vision deficits without depriving the wearers of their normal views of the scene. Ideally, wearers would make use of the simultaneous views to alert them to potential mobility hazards, without a need to divide attention consciously. Inattentional blindness, the frequent inability to notice otherwise‐obvious events in one scene while paying attention to another, overlapping, scene, works against that sort of augmentation, so we are investigating ways to mitigate it. In this study, we filtered the augmented view, creating cartoon‐like representations, to make it easier to detect significant features in that view and to minimise interference with the normal view. We reproduced a classic inattentional blindness experiment to evaluate the effect, and found that, surprisingly, edge filtering had no detectable effect – positive or negative – on the noticing of unexpected events in the unattended scene. We then modified the experiment to determine if the inattentional blindness was because of the confusion of overlaid views or simply a matter of attention, and found the latter to be the case.

[1]  Michael S. Ambinder,et al.  Change blindness , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[3]  E Peli,et al.  Vision Multiplexing: an Engineering Approach to Vision Rehabilitation Device Development , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[4]  Gang Luo,et al.  Evaluation of a prototype Minified Augmented‐View device for patients with impaired night vision * , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[5]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  The effects of eye movements, spatial attention, and stimulus features on inattentional blindness , 2004, Vision Research.

[6]  Richard F. Haines,et al.  A Breakdown in Simultaneous Information Processing , 1991 .

[7]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness , 2007, Cognition.

[9]  Gang Luo,et al.  Use of an augmented-vision device for visual search by patients with tunnel vision. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Steven B. Most,et al.  How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness , 2001, Psychological science.

[11]  J. Sheedy,et al.  Eyelid Squint Response to Asthenopia-Inducing Conditions , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  Ronald A. Rensink When Good Observers Go Bad: Change Blindness, Inattentional Blindness, and Visual Experience , 2000 .

[13]  Gang Luo,et al.  Applications of augmented‐vision head‐mounted systems in vision rehabilitation , 2007, Journal of the Society for Information Display.

[14]  Lawrence Stark,et al.  Presbyopia research : from molecular biology to visual adaptation , 1991 .

[15]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[16]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  PSYCHE an interdisciplinary journal of research on consciousness Sustained Inattentional Blindness : The Role of Location in the Detection of Unexpected Dynamic Events , 2000 .

[17]  Eli Peli,et al.  Vision multiplexing: an optical engineering concept for low-vision aids , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[18]  R. Becklen,et al.  Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events , 1983 .

[19]  A. Mack Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[20]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  F. Vargas-Martin,et al.  Augmented-View for Restricted Visual Field: Multiple Device Implementations , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in visual awareness , 2006, Brain Research.

[24]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Superimposition, Symbology, Visual Attention, and the Head-Up Display , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[25]  R. Marois,et al.  Visual Short-Term Memory Load Suppresses Temporo-Parietal Junction Activity and Induces Inattentional Blindness , 2005, Psychological science.

[26]  Robust inattentional blindness , 2005 .

[27]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Anne D. Pick,et al.  Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson , 1979 .

[29]  E. Peli Feature detection algorithm based on a visual system model , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[30]  Yitzhak Yitzhaky,et al.  Wideband enhancement of television images for people with visual impairments. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[31]  Andy Stevens,et al.  22.2: Evaluation Of Flat Panel Display Technologies For An Automotive Night Vision Enhancement HUD System , 1998 .