A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations

Many river restoration projects are focusing on restoring environmental flow regimes to improve ecosystem health in rivers that have been developed for water supply, hydropower generation, flood control, navigation, and other purposes. In efforts to prevent future ecological damage, water supply planners in some parts of the world are beginning to address the water needs of river ecosystems proactively by reserving some portion of river flows for ecosystem support. These restorative and protective actions require development of scientifically credible estimates of environmental flow needs. This paper describes an adaptive, inter-disciplinary, science-based process for developing environmental flow recommendations. It has been designed for use in a variety of water management activities, including flow restoration projects, and can be tailored according to available time and resources for determining environmental flow needs. The five-step process includes: (1) an orientation meeting; (2) a literature review and summary of existing knowledge about flow-dependent biota and ecological processes of concern; (3) a workshop to develop ecological objectives and initial flow recommendations, and identify key information gaps; (4) implementation of the flow recommendations on a trial basis to test hypotheses and reduce uncertainties; and (5) monitoring system response and conducting further research as warranted. A range of recommended flows are developed for the low flows in each month, high flow pulses throughout the year, and floods with targeted inter-annual frequencies. We describe an application of this process to the Savannah River, in which the resultant flow recommendations were incorporated into a comprehensive river basin planning process conducted by the Corps of Engineers, and used to initiate the adaptive management of Thurmond Dam. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Geoffrey C. Poole,et al.  A Protocol for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[2]  Robert R. Everitt,et al.  Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management: Some Current Applications , 1983 .

[3]  Sandra Postel,et al.  Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last? , 1999 .

[4]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[5]  Brian Richter,et al.  River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making , 2003 .

[6]  S. Postel,et al.  Rivers for Life: Managing Water For People And Nature , 2003 .

[7]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions , 1997 .

[8]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[9]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  Uncertainty and instream flow standards , 1996 .

[10]  M. Freeman,et al.  Regional Effects of Hydrologic Alterations on Riverine Macrobiota in the New World: Tropical–Temperate Comparisons , 2000 .

[11]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  Managing Water More Wisely@@@The World's Water 1998-1999: The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources , 1999 .

[12]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[13]  Anthony R. Olsen,et al.  Measuring Trends in Ecological Resources1 , 1998 .

[14]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[15]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  MEETING ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIETAL NEEDS FOR FRESHWATER , 2002 .

[16]  Clair B. Stalnaker,et al.  Instream Flows for Riverine Resource Stewardship , 2002 .

[17]  Carmen Revenga,et al.  Pilot analysis of global ecosystems : freshwater systems , 2000 .

[18]  C. Walters.  Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems , 1997 .

[19]  Kai N. Lee.  Appraising Adaptive Management , 2000 .

[20]  Charles C. Coutant,et al.  A GENERAL PROTOCOL FOR RESTORATION OF REGULATED RIVERS , 1996 .

[21]  Wcd.  Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making , 2000 .

[22]  K. Hyatt,et al.  Status of Anadromous Salmon and Trout in British Columbia and Yukon , 1996 .

[23]  R. Tharme.  A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers , 2003 .

[24]  B. Richter,et al.  Quenching Urban Thirst: Growing Cities and Their Impacts on Freshwater Ecosystems , 2004 .

[25]  Mary C. Freeman,et al.  Proposal for Adaptive Management to Conserve Biotic Integrity in a Regulated Segment of the Tallapoosa River, Alabama, U.S.A. , 2002 .

[26]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[27]  Brian Richter,et al.  ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE WATER MANAGEMENT: MANAGING RIVER FLOWS FOR ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY , 2003 .

[28]  Barry L. Johnson,et al.  The Role of Adaptive Management as an Operational Approach for Resource Management Agencies , 1999 .

[29]  David P. Braun,et al.  Are We Conserving What We Say We Are? Measuring Ecological Integrity within Protected Areas , 2003 .

[30]  D. M. Rosenberg,et al.  Global-Scale Environmental Effects of Hydrological Alterations: Introduction , 2000 .

[31]  J. Stanford,et al.  Research needs in regulated river ecology , 1993 .

[32]  David R. Marmorek,et al.  Finding a PATH toward Scientific Collaboration: Insights from the Columbia River Basin , 2002 .

[33]  Harry Biggs,et al.  Integrating indicators, endpoints and value systems in strategic management of the rivers of the Kruger National Park , 1999 .

[34]  C. Walters,et al.  Ecosystem Modeling for Evaluation of Adaptive Management Policies in the Grand Canyon , 2000 .

[35]  Brian Richter,et al.  A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network , 1998 .

[36]  Arthur C. Benke,et al.  A Perspective on America's Vanishing Streams , 1990, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.