Vessel membrane segmentation and calcification location in intravascular ultrasound images using a region detector and an effective selection strategy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Segmenting vessel membranes and locating the calcific region in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images aid physicians in the diagnosis of atherosclerosis. However, the manual extraction of the media adventitia (MA)/lumen border and calcification location are cumbersome due to the excessive number of IVUS frames. Moreover, most existing (semi-)automatic detection methods cannot achieve both vessel membrane extraction and calcification location simultaneously, and they are unable to detect vessel membranes in IVUS frames from different acquisition systems. METHOD A fully automatic approach is proposed based on extremal regions and a flexible selection strategy to extract vessel membranes in different IVUS frames and locate the calcific region in high-frequency ones. Three main steps are included in the algorithm. First, a region detector is employed to extract extremal regions from an IVUS image. Then, according to the selection strategy, a part of the extracted regions is selected. At the same time, the calcification is located according to its special acoustic properties. Next, approximate MA and lumen border segmentation is achieved based on the selected extremal regions and the located calcification in polar coordinates. Finally, the final segmentation results are obtained by smoothing the approximate values. RESULT To demonstrate the feasibility of the method, it was evaluated based on a standard public dataset. Furthermore, to quantitatively evaluate the segmentation performance, the Hausdorff distance (HD), Jaccard measure (JM) and percentage of area difference (PAD) were used. The results show that a mean HD of 1.13/1.21 mm, a mean JM of 0.83/0.77 and a mean PAD of 0.11/0.23 are achieved for MA/lumen border detection in 77 40-MHz IVUS images. For MA/lumen border extraction in 435 20-MHz IVUS frames, the average HD, JM and PAD values are 0.47/0.28 mm, 0.84/0.89 and 0.13/0.10, respectively. In addition, the approach successfully achieves calcification location in 40-MHz IVUS frames. In comparison with other published methods, the method proposed in this study is competitive. CONCLUSION According to these results, our strategy can extract MA/lumen borders in different IVUS frames and effectively locate calcification in high-frequency IVUS frames.

[1]  E. Gerardo Mendizabal-Ruiz,et al.  Segmentation of the luminal border in intravascular ultrasound B-mode images using a probabilistic approach , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  An automated method for lumen and media-adventitia border detection in a sequence of IVUS frames , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[3]  D Fontanarosa,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Femoral Cartilage Automatic Segmentation in Ultrasound Imaging for Guidance in Robotic Knee Arthroscopy. , 2019, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  Ioannis Kompatsiaris,et al.  Image analysis techniques for automated IVUS contour detection. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  Elsa D. Angelini,et al.  Lumen Border Detection of Intravascular Ultrasound via Denoising of Directional Wavelet Representations , 2009, FIMH.

[7]  Petia Radeva,et al.  HoliMAb: A holistic approach for Media-Adventitia border detection in intravascular ultrasound , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Yuanyuan Wang,et al.  Estimating coronary artery lumen area with optimization-based contour detection , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Jouke Dijkstra,et al.  Automatic border detection in intravascular iltrasound images for quantitative measurements of the vessel, lumen and stent parameters , 2001, Computers in Cardiology 2001. Vol.28 (Cat. No.01CH37287).

[10]  Ahmad Ayatollahi,et al.  A new nonparametric statistical approach to detect lumen and Media-Adventitia borders in intravascular ultrasound frames , 2019, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[11]  J. Muller,et al.  Triggering and hourly variation of onset of arterial thrombosis. , 1992, Annals of epidemiology.

[12]  G Kovalski,et al.  Three-dimensional automatic quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  E. Falk Why do plaques rupture? , 1992, Circulation.

[14]  Xianghua Xie,et al.  Automatic segmentation of cross-sectional coronary arterial images , 2017, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[15]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Improving airway segmentation in computed tomography using leak detection with convolutional networks , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  Jean Meunier,et al.  Space Curve Approach for IVUS Image Segmentation , 2018, 2018 IEEE Life Sciences Conference (LSC).

[17]  Zhifeng Gao,et al.  Wildfire smoke detection based on local extremal region segmentation and surveillance , 2016 .

[18]  Zexi Hu,et al.  Extended compressed tracking via random projection based on MSERs and online LS-SVM learning , 2016, Pattern Recognit..

[19]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Automatic segmentation of calcified plaques and vessel borders in IVUS images , 2008, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[20]  Azin Alizadehasl,et al.  MFP-Unet: A Novel Deep Learning Based Approach for Left Ventricle Segmentation in Echocardiography , 2019, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[21]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Segmentation of intravascular ultrasound images: a knowledge-based approach , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[22]  W. Little,et al.  Angiographic assessment of the culprit coronary artery lesion before acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  Ruibin Ma,et al.  Lumen and media-adventitia border detection in IVUS images using texture enhanced deformable model , 2018, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[24]  Shun-Ren Xia,et al.  Fractional‐order Darwinian PSO‐based feature selection for media‐adventitia border detection in intravascular ultrasound images , 2019, Ultrasonics.

[25]  E. Gerardo Mendizabal-Ruiz,et al.  Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics , 2022 .

[26]  Guy Cloutier,et al.  Segmentation method of intravascular ultrasound images of human coronary arteries , 2014, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[27]  Anup Basu,et al.  Robust segmentation of arterial walls in intravascular ultrasound images using Dual Path U-Net. , 2019, Ultrasonics.

[28]  Jean Meunier,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound image segmentation: a three-dimensional fast-marching method based on gray level distributions , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Anup Basu,et al.  Segmentation of arterial walls in intravascular ultrasound cross‐sectional images using extremal region selection , 2018, Ultrasonics.

[30]  Zeng-Guang Hou,et al.  Applying maximally stable extremal regions and local binary patterns for guide-wire detecting in percutaneous coronary intervention , 2019, IET Image Process..

[31]  D. Gutfinger,et al.  In vitro atherosclerotic plaque and calcium quantitation by intravascular ultrasound and electron-beam computed tomography. , 1996, American heart journal.

[32]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions , 2004, Image Vis. Comput..