Do emerging market multinational corporations headquarter-subsidiary relationships foster subsidiary innovation and performance in developed markets?

[1]  Eric Zhao,et al.  International expansion and home-country resource acquisition: A signaling perspective of emerging-market firms’ internationalization , 2023, Journal of International Business Studies.

[2]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  Innovativeness and the relevance of political ties in Chinese MNEs , 2022, Journal of Business Research.

[3]  I. Stensaker,et al.  Organizational identity work in MNE subsidiaries: Managing dual embeddedness , 2022, Journal of International Business Studies.

[4]  Xiaocong Tian.  The art of rhetoric: Host country political hostility and the rhetorical strategies of foreign subsidiaries in developing economies , 2022, Journal of World Business.

[5]  S. Munjal,et al.  Examining the evolution of emerging market multinational enterprises’ competitive advantages: Evidence from India , 2022, Journal of Business Research.

[6]  Fuming Jiang,et al.  From horizontal knowledge sharing to vertical knowledge transfer: The role of boundary-spanning commitment in international joint ventures , 2022, Journal of International Business Studies.

[7]  M. Geiger,et al.  Managing internal embeddedness in multinational corporations’ R&D subsidiaries: An evolutionary perspective on the automotive industry in Silicon Valley , 2021, Technovation.

[8]  Liang Wang,et al.  Returnee managers as an asset for emerging market multinational enterprises: Chinese cross-border acquisitions (2008–2017) , 2021, Journal of World Business.

[9]  Vikas Kumar,et al.  Emerging market internationalizing firms: Learning through internationalization to achieve entrepreneurial orientation , 2021 .

[10]  J. Duanmu,et al.  Foreign buyout of international equity joint ventures in China: When does performance improve? , 2021 .

[11]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  Headquarters parenting advantage in Chinese MNEs: The moderating role of top managers’ political and International experience , 2021, International Business Review.

[12]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  Reverse innovation transfer in Chinese MNCs: The role of political ties and headquarters , 2021 .

[13]  S. Athreye,et al.  Financial Crisis of 2008 and Outward Foreign Investments from China and India , 2021, Journal of World Business.

[14]  M. Bogers,et al.  Subsidiary innovation performance: Balancing external knowledge sources and internal embeddedness , 2020, Journal of International Management.

[15]  M. Kafouros,et al.  The role of internationalization in enhancing the innovation performance of Chinese EMNEs: A geographic relational approach , 2020 .

[16]  Q. Li,et al.  The role of technology standards in product innovation: Theory and evidence from UK manufacturing firms , 2020, Research Policy.

[17]  Chun-Ping Yeh.  Social control or bureaucratic control? -The effects of the control mechanisms on the subsidiary performance , 2020 .

[18]  Barclay E. James,et al.  Emerging market multinationals’ firm-specific advantages, institutional distance, and foreign acquisition location choice , 2020 .

[19]  S. Fainshmidt,et al.  Subsidiary autonomy and subsidiary performance: A meta-analysis , 2020 .

[20]  A. Schotter,et al.  Managing the MNE subsidiary: Advancing a multi-level and dynamic research agenda , 2020, Journal of International Business Studies.

[21]  Hsiang‐Lin Cheng,et al.  Does dual Embeddedness matter? Mechanisms and patterns of subsidiary ambidexterity that links a Subsidiary’s dual Embeddedness with its learning strategy , 2020 .

[22]  M. T. Fleury,et al.  Overcoming the liability of outsidership for emerging market MNEs: A capability-building perspective , 2019, Journal of International Business Studies.

[23]  D. Teece,et al.  The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise , 2019, Journal of International Business Studies.

[24]  Ismail Gölgeci,et al.  European MNE subsidiaries' embeddedness and innovation performance: Moderating role of external search depth and breadth , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[25]  Diego Stea,et al.  Headquarters involvement, socialization, and entrepreneurial behaviors in MNC subsidiaries , 2019, Long Range Planning.

[26]  David H. Weng,et al.  The more, the merrier? How a subsidiary's organizational identification with the MNE affects its initiative , 2019, Long Range Planning.

[27]  Young‐Ryeol Park,et al.  Managing legitimacy through corporate community involvement: The effects of subsidiary ownership and host country experience in China , 2019, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

[28]  Lin Cui,et al.  Outward FDI and profitability of emerging economy firms: Diversifying from home resource dependence in early stage internationalization , 2019, Journal of World Business.

[29]  Zaheer Khan,et al.  Technological innovation as a source of Chinese multinationals’ firm-specific advantages and internationalization , 2019, International Journal of Emerging Markets.

[30]  Norifumi Kawai,et al.  Expatriate utilization, subsidiary knowledge creation and performance: The moderating role of subsidiary strategic context , 2019, Journal of World Business.

[31]  V. Shirodkar,et al.  Regulatory Institutional Distance and MNCs' Subsidiary Performance: Climbing up Vs. Climbing Down the Institutional Ladder , 2018, Journal of International Management.

[32]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  Expatriate managers' relationships and reverse knowledge transfer within emerging market MNCs: The mediating role of subsidiary willingness , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[33]  J. Mata,et al.  The survival of firms founded by immigrants: Institutional distance between home and host country, and experience in the host country , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[34]  P. Ghauri,et al.  Institutional distance and knowledge acquisition in international buyer-supplier relationships: The moderating role of trust , 2017, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

[35]  P. Soh,et al.  The role of dual embeddedness and organizational learning in subsidiary development , 2018 .

[36]  S. Fainshmidt,et al.  To elevate or to duplicate? Experiential learning, host-country institutions, and MNE post-entry commitment increase , 2018, Journal of World Business.

[37]  S. Beugelsdijk,et al.  Product innovation and decision-making autonomy in subsidiaries of multinational companies , 2018, Journal of World Business.

[38]  Ramsin Yakob,et al.  Chinese foreign acquisitions aimed for strategic asset-creation and innovation upgrading: The case of Geely and Volvo Cars , 2018 .

[39]  Chengqi Wang,et al.  Outward FDI, location choices and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises , 2018 .

[40]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Subsidiary capability upgrading under emerging market acquirers , 2017 .

[41]  D. Chatterjee,et al.  Technological Innovation Research in China and India: A Bibliometric Analysis for the Period 1991–2015 , 2017, Management and Organization Review.

[42]  P. Kappen,et al.  Reconceptualising Hierarchies: The Disaggregation and Dispersion of Headquarters in Multinational Corporations , 2017 .

[43]  J. Balogun,et al.  The interplay between HQ legitimation and subsidiary legitimacy judgments in HQ relocation: A social psychological approach , 2017, Journal of International Business Studies.

[44]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Internal embeddedness, geographic distance, and global knowledge sourcing by overseas subsidiaries , 2017 .

[45]  Alexander Leischnig,et al.  Endogeneity bias in marketing research: Problem, causes and remedies , 2017 .

[46]  E. Giuliani,et al.  Overcoming the liability of origin by doing no-harm: Emerging country firms’ social irresponsibility as they go global , 2017 .

[47]  Vesa Peltokorpi,et al.  Corporate language proficiency in reverse knowledge transfer: A moderated mediation model of shared vision and communication frequency , 2017 .

[48]  Andrew B. Kennedy.  Unequal Partners: U.S. Collaboration with China and India in Research and Development: U.S. COLLABORATION WITH CHINA AND INDIA , 2017 .

[49]  Óscar Martín Martín,et al.  Value Creation at the Subsidiary Level: Testing the MNC Headquarters Parenting Advantage Logic , 2017 .

[50]  V. Shirodkar,et al.  Institutional Distance and Foreign Subsidiary Performance in Emerging Markets: Moderating Effects of Ownership Strategy and Host-Country Experience , 2016 .

[51]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Emerging market multinational companies’ evolutionary paths to building a competitive advantage from emerging markets to developed countries , 2016 .

[52]  D. Collings,et al.  The legitimacy of subsidiary issue selling: Balancing positive & negative attention from corporate headquarters , 2016 .

[53]  Eleni Lioliou,et al.  Environmental risks, localization and the overseas subsidiary performance of MNEs from an emerging economy , 2016 .

[54]  Jonas F. Puck,et al.  Embeddedness, Ownership Mode and Dynamics, and the Performance of MNE Subsidiaries , 2016 .

[55]  M. Demirbag,et al.  Reverse knowledge transfer in emerging market multinationals : the Indian context , 2016 .

[56]  Eleni Lioliou,et al.  Does learning at home and from abroad boost the foreign subsidiary performance of emerging economy multinational enterprises , 2016 .

[57]  Jeongho Choi,et al.  Choosing an appropriate alliance governance mode: The role of institutional, cultural and geographical distance in international research & development (R&D) collaborations , 2016 .

[58]  Chengqi Wang,et al.  Internationalization and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: The role of host-country institutional development , 2016 .

[59]  M. W. Hansen,et al.  What makes MNCs succeed in developing countries? An empirical analysis of subsidiary performance , 2015 .

[60]  H. Schmitz,et al.  Reorganising global value chains and building innovation capabilities in Brazil and India , 2015 .

[61]  Snejina Michailova,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and innovation in MNC subsidiaries , 2015 .

[62]  I. Vertinsky,et al.  Transfers of tacit vs explicit knowledge and performance in international joint ventures: the role of age , 2015 .

[63]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  Are relational ties always good for knowledge acquisition? Buyer–supplier exchanges in China , 2014 .

[64]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Knowledge creation capability in MNC subsidiaries: Examining the roles of global and local knowledge inflows and subsidiary knowledge stocks , 2014 .

[65]  Paloma Miravitlles,et al.  Knowledge sharing and subsidiary R&D mandate development: A matter of dual embeddedness , 2014 .

[66]  Lucia Piscitello,et al.  Reverse knowledge transfer in MNEs: : subsidiary innovativeness and entry modes , 2014 .

[67]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Autonomy delegation to foreign subsidiaries: An enabling mechanism for emerging-market multinationals , 2014 .

[68]  H. Thomas,et al.  Market Orientation, Embeddedness and the Autonomy and Performance of Multinational Subsidiaries in an Emerging Economy , 2013 .

[69]  Björn Ambos,et al.  Parenting Advantage in the MNC: An Embeddedness Perspective on the Value Added by Headquarters , 2013 .

[70]  S. Collinson,et al.  The evolution of innovation capability in multinational enterprise subsidiaries: Dual network embeddedness and the divergence of subsidiary specialisation in Taiwan , 2012 .

[71]  Jan Johanson,et al.  Overcoming the Liability of Outsidership—The Challenge of HQ of the Global Firm , 2012 .

[72]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Expatriate Knowledge Transfer, Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity, and Subsidiary Performance , 2012 .

[73]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  EMNE catch‐up strategies in the wind turbine industry: Is there a trade‐off between output and innovation capabilities? , 2012 .

[74]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Alliance Portfolio Resource Diversity and Firm Innovation , 2012 .

[75]  M. Forsgren,et al.  Headquarters involvement and efficiency of innovation development and transfer in multinationals : A matter of sheer ignorance? , 2012 .

[76]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  Internal Embeddedness, Headquarters Involvement, and Innovation Importance in Multinational Enterprises , 2011 .

[77]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  A dynamic perspective on subsidiary autonomy , 2011 .

[78]  M. Forsgren,et al.  Rationality vs ignorance: The role of MNE headquarters in subsidiaries’ innovation processes , 2011 .

[79]  Helena Forsman,et al.  Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises. A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors , 2011 .

[80]  Larissa Rabbiosi,et al.  Subsidiary Roles and Reverse Knowledge Transfer: An Investigation of the Effects of Coordination Mechanisms , 2011 .

[81]  D. Sharma,et al.  Embeddedness of innovation receivers in the multinational corporation: Effects on business performance , 2011 .

[82]  S. Zahra,et al.  A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. , 2011 .

[83]  Ulf Andersson,et al.  Subsidiary importance in the MNC: What role does internal embeddedness play? , 2011 .

[84]  Hsin-Ju Tsai,et al.  The Performance Effects of Headquarters’ Involvement in Lateral Innovation Transfers in Multinational Corporations , 2011 .

[85]  R. Narula,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness , 2011 .

[86]  P. N. Figueiredo,et al.  The Role of Dual Embeddedness in the Innovative Performance of MNE Subsidiaries: Evidence from Brazil , 2011 .

[87]  Wann‐Yih Wu,et al.  Experience, environment, and subsidiary performance in high-tech MNEs , 2010 .

[88]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? , 2010 .

[89]  A. Dossi,et al.  You learn from what you measure: financial and non-financial performance measures in multinational companies , 2010 .

[90]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Multinational Firm Knowledge, Use of Expatriates, and Foreign Subsidiary Performance , 2010 .

[91]  John W. Henke,et al.  Do buyer cooperative actions matter under relational stress? Evidence from Japanese and U.S. assemblers in the U.S. automotive industry , 2009 .

[92]  J. Bell.  BRICOland brands: the rise of the new multinationals , 2009 .

[93]  J. Larimo,et al.  Challenging the Conceptualization and Measurement of Distance and International Experience in Entry Mode Choice Research , 2009 .

[94]  Björn Ambos,et al.  The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations , 2009 .

[95]  Brian L. Connelly,et al.  Making the Most of What You've Got: Managerial Ability as a Source of Resource Value Creation , 2008 .

[96]  Anupama Phene,et al.  Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities , 2008 .

[97]  B. Schlegelmilch,et al.  Innovation and control in the multinational firm: A comparison of political and contingency approaches , 2007 .

[98]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Ownership Strategies and Survival of Foreign Subsidiaries: Impacts of Institutional Distance and Experience , 2007 .

[99]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness , 2005 .

[100]  Lutz Kaufmann,et al.  Managing conflict of interests between headquarters and their subsidiaries regarding technology transfer to emerging markets--a framework , 2005 .

[101]  L. Hébert,et al.  Equity control and the survival of international joint ventures: a contingency approach , 2005 .

[102]  R. Belderbos,et al.  The determinants of expatriate staffing by Japanese multinationals in Asia: control, learning and vertical business groups , 2005 .

[103]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in Ijvs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact on Performance , 2004 .

[104]  Li Li,et al.  Managing Knowledge Transfer in Mncs: The Impact of Headquarters Control Mechanisms , 2004 .

[105]  P. Almeida,et al.  Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation , 2004 .

[106]  Stefan Schmid,et al.  The development of critical capabilities in foreign subsidiaries: disentangling the role of the subsidiary's business network , 2003 .

[107]  C. Fey,et al.  MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM , 2003 .

[108]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[109]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation , 2002 .

[110]  N. Dayasindhu,et al.  Embeddedness, knowledge transfer, industry clusters and global competitiveness: a case study of the Indian software industry , 2002 .

[111]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Survival and Profitability: The Roles of Experience and Intangible Assets in Foreign Subsidiary Performance , 2002 .

[112]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[113]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Subsidiary performance in multinational corporations: the importance of technology embeddedness , 2001 .

[114]  A. Ferner.  The Underpinnings of ‘Bureaucratic’ Control Systems: HRM in European Multinationals , 2000 .

[115]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[116]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[117]  Andrew Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy and parenting theory , 1998 .

[118]  J. Anand,et al.  Location Specificity and the Transferability of Downstream Assets to Foreign Subsidiaries , 1997 .

[119]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  On the Rationales of Corporate Headquarters , 1997 .

[120]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[121]  Andrew Delios,et al.  Local Knowledge Transfer and Performance: Implications for Alliance Formation in Asia , 1996 .

[122]  Jeanne M. Brett,et al.  Agency Theory and Variable Pay Compensation Strategies , 1996 .

[123]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters‐subsidiary relations , 1994 .

[124]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective , 1994 .

[125]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[126]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[127]  Joseph L. C. Cheng,et al.  The Management of Multinational R&D: A Neglected Topic in International Business Research , 1993 .

[128]  Alfred D. Chandler.  The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm , 1991 .

[129]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[130]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[131]  Roger Mansfield,et al.  Bureaucracy and Centralization: An Examination of Organizational Structure. , 1973 .

[132]  J. Child.  Predicting and Understanding Organization Structure. , 1973 .

[133]  Xiaotao Yao,et al.  Imitation and rapid internationalization of emerging market firms , 2022, Journal of World Business.

[134]  I. Álvarez,et al.  The impact of external, internal, and dual relational embeddedness on the innovation performance of foreign subsidiaries: Evidence from a developing country , 2021 .

[135]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Accessing vs sourcing knowledge: A comparative study of R&D internationalization between emerging and advanced economy firms , 2015 .

[136]  M. Nieto,et al.  The effect of the magnitude and direction of institutional distance on the choice of international entry modes , 2015 .

[137]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[138]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Redundancies in External Relationships of Multinational Corporations : A Firm Level Conceptual Model and Preliminary Evidence , 2013 .

[139]  Ulf Andersson,et al.  The Interplay of Networking Activities and Internal Knowledge Actions for Subsidiary Influence within MNCs , 2012 .

[140]  Grazia D. Santangelo,et al.  Parent Company Benefits from Reverse Knowledge Transfer: The Role of the Liability of Newness in MNEs , 2011 .

[141]  Morgan Swink,et al.  EFFECTS OF MARKETING-MANUFACTURING INTEGRATION ON NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TIME AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2007 .

[142]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  Managing executive attention in the global company , 2007 .

[143]  J. Barney,et al.  The Growth of the Firm in Planned Economies in Transition: Institutions, Organizations, and Strategic Choice , 1996 .