Adaptive designs in multi-reader multi-case clinical trials of imaging devices

Evaluation of medical imaging devices often involves clinical studies where multiple readers (MR) read images of multiple cases (MC) for a clinical task, which are often called MRMC studies. In addition to sizing patient cases as is required in most clinical trials, MRMC studies also require sizing readers, since both readers and cases contribute to the uncertainty of the estimated diagnostic performance, which is often measured by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Due to limited prior information, sizing of such a study is often unreliable. It is desired to adaptively resize the study toward a target power after an interim analysis. Although adaptive methods are available in clinical trials where only the patient sample is sized, such methodologies have not been established for MRMC studies. The challenge lies in the fact that there is a correlation structure in MRMC data and the sizing involves both readers and cases. We develop adaptive MRMC design methodologies to enable study resizing. In particular, we resize the study and adjust the critical value for hypothesis testing simultaneously after an interim analysis to achieve a target power and control the type I error rate in comparing AUCs of two modalities. Analytical results have been derived. Simulations show that the type I error rate is controlled close to the nominal level and the power is adjusted toward the target value under a variety of simulation conditions. We demonstrate the use of our methods in a real-world application comparing two imaging modalities for breast cancer detection.

[1]  Draft Guidance Guidance for Industry Adaptive Design Clinical Trials for Drugs and Biologics DRAFT GUIDANCE , 2010 .

[2]  Draft Guidance Adaptive Design Clinical Trials for Drugs and Biologics , 2010 .

[3]  Highly Multiplexed Microbiological / Medical Countermeasure In Vitro Nucleic Acid Based Diagnostic Devices Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff , 2014 .

[4]  Weijie Chen,et al.  Paired split-plot designs of multireader multicase studies , 2018, Journal of medical imaging.

[5]  S. Hillis A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  E. Halpern,et al.  Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. , 2013, Radiology.

[7]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[8]  Frank W. Samuelson,et al.  Re-use of pilot data and interim analysis of pivotal data in MRMC studies: a simulation study , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[9]  N A Obuchowski,et al.  Multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[10]  Cyrus R Mehta,et al.  Adaptive increase in sample size when interim results are promising: A practical guide with examples , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Multi-reader ROC studies with split-plot designs: a comparison of statistical methods. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[12]  Sue-Jane Wang,et al.  Modification of Sample Size in Group Sequential Clinical Trials , 1999, Biometrics.

[13]  N A Obuchowski,et al.  Multireader receiver operating characteristic studies: a comparison of study designs. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[14]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[15]  A. Tsiatis,et al.  On the inefficiency of the adaptive design for monitoring clinical trials , 2003 .

[16]  D. DeMets,et al.  Increasing the sample size when the unblinded interim result is promising , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Gregory P Levin,et al.  Adaptive clinical trial designs with pre‐specified rules for modifying the sample size: understanding efficient types of adaptation , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  Nancy A. Obuchowski,et al.  Power estimation for multireader ROC methods an updated and unified approach. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[19]  Michael A Proschan,et al.  Two-Stage Sample Size Re-Estimation Based on a Nuisance Parameter: A Review , 2005, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[20]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Hypothesis testing of diagnostic accuracy for multiple readers and multiple tests: An anova approach with dependent observations , 1995 .

[21]  Lingyun Liu,et al.  An objective re‐evaluation of adaptive sample size re‐estimation: commentary on ‘Twenty‐five years of confirmatory adaptive designs’ , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  Brandon D Gallas,et al.  One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[23]  J. Ware,et al.  Sample Size Re-Estimation for Adaptive Sequential Design in Clinical Trials , 2008, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[24]  C A Roe,et al.  Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic data: validation with computer simulation. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[25]  Brandon D Gallas,et al.  Generalized Roe and Metz receiver operating characteristic model: analytic link between simulated decision scores and empirical AUC variances and covariances , 2014, Journal of medical imaging.