Image feature extraction for mass detection in digital mammography: Influence of wavelet analysis

Rationale and objectives. The objective of this work is to evaluate the importance of image preprocessing, using multiresolution and multiorientation wavelet transforms (WTs), on the performance of a previously reported computer assisted diagnostic(CAD) method for breast cancer screening, using digital mammography.Method: An analysis of the influence of WTs on image feature extraction for mass detection is achieved by comparing the discriminant ability of features extracted with and without the wavelet-based image preprocessing using computed ROC. Three indexes are proposed to assess the segmentation of the mass area with comparison to the ground truth. Data was analyzed on the region-of-interest (ROI) database that included mass and normal regions from digitized mammograms with the ground truth. Results: The metrics for the measurement of segmentation of the mass clearly demonstrated the importance of image preprocessing methods. Similarly, the relative improvement in performance was observed in feature extraction based on the evaluation of the ROC curves, where the Az values are increased, for example, from 0.71 to 0.75 for a pixel intensity feature and from 0.72 to 0.85 for a morphological feature of the Normalized Deviation of Radial Length. The improvement, therefore, depends on the feature characteristics, being large for boundary-related features while small for intensity-related features. Conclusion: The use of image preprocessing modules using wavelet transforms results in a significant improvement in feature extraction for the previously proposed CAD detection method. We are therefore exploring additional improvement in wavelet-based image preprocessing methods, including adaptive methods, to achieve a further improvement in performance and an evaluation on larger imagedatabases.

[1]  R. Clark,et al.  Economic issues in screening mammography. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  L P Clarke,et al.  Interpretation of calcifications in screen/film, digitized, and wavelet-enhanced monitor-displayed mammograms: a receiver operating characteristic study. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[3]  L P Clarke,et al.  Digital mammography: computer-assisted diagnosis method for mass detection with multiorientation and multiresolution wavelet transforms. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[4]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas.  An adaptive clustering algorithm for image segmentation , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  D R Haynor,et al.  Resampling estimates of precision in emission tomography. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[6]  S. Lai,et al.  On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[7]  G. Wright,et al.  In vivo magnetic resonance evaluation of blood oxygen saturation in the superior mesenteric vein as a measure of the degree of acute flow reduction in the superior mesenteric artery: findings in a canine model. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[8]  I Andersson,et al.  Chapter IV. Reduced breast‐cancer mortality with mammography screening‐an assessment of currently available data , 1990, International journal of cancer. Supplement = Journal international du cancer. Supplement.

[9]  N. Petrick,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis. , 1995, Medical physics.

[10]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Investigation of methods for the computerized detection and analysis of mammographic masses , 1990, Medical Imaging: Image Processing.

[11]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  T K Lau,et al.  Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[13]  M A Helvie,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: classification of mass and normal tissue by texture analysis , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[16]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. , 1991, Medical physics.

[17]  Vijay K. Jain,et al.  Markov random field for tumor detection in digital mammography , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[18]  Jian Fan,et al.  Mammographic feature enhancement by multiscale analysis , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[19]  Martin D. Fox,et al.  Classifying mammographic lesions using computerized image analysis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[21]  Baoyu Zheng,et al.  Digital mammography: mixed feature neural network with spectral entropy decision for detection of microcalcifications , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[22]  P. Undrill,et al.  The use of texture analysis to delineate suspicious masses in mammography. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[24]  D Brzakovic,et al.  An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.