SHIELD: Social sensing and Help In Emergency using mobiLe Devices

School and College campuses face a perceived threat of violent crimes and require a realistic plan against unpredictable emergencies and disasters. Existing emergency systems (e.g., 911, campus-wide alerts) are quite useful, but provide delayed response (often tens of minutes) and do not utilize proximity or locality. There is a need to exploit proximitybased help for immediate response and to deter any crime. In this paper, we propose SHIELD, an on-campus emergency rescue and alert management service. It is a fully distributed infrastructureless platform based on proximity-enabled trust and cooperation. It relies on nearby localized responses sent using Bluetooth and/or WiFi to achieve minimal response time and maximal availability thereby augmenting the traditional notion of centralized emergency services. Analysis of campus crime statistics and WLAN traces surprisingly show a strong positive correlation (over 55%) between on-campus crime statistics and spatiotemporal density distribution of on-campus mobile users. This result is promising to develop a platform based on mutual trust and cooperation. Finally, we also show a prototype application to be used in such scenarios.

[1]  Charles R. McLean,et al.  A framework for modeling and simulation for emergency response , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 2003..

[2]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  CSI: A Paradigm for Behavior-oriented Delivery Services in Mobile Human Networks , 2008, ArXiv.

[3]  Tristan Henderson,et al.  CRAWDAD: a community resource for archiving wireless data at Dartmouth , 2005, CCRV.

[4]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  Modeling Spatial and Temporal Dependencies of User Mobility in Wireless Mobile Networks , 2008, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[5]  F. Stokman,et al.  Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network , 2003 .

[6]  Christophe Diot,et al.  Impact of Human Mobility on Opportunistic Forwarding Algorithms , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[7]  B. S. Manoj,et al.  Communication challenges in emergency response , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[8]  David Lazer,et al.  Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Pan Hui,et al.  Haggle: A networking architecture designed around mobile users , 2006 .

[10]  Darren Leigh,et al.  Social net: using patterns of physical proximity over time to infer shared interests , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  WIPER: The Integrated Wireless Phone Based Emergency Response System , 2006, International Conference on Computational Science.

[12]  Pan Hui,et al.  Impact of Human Mobility on the Design of Opportunistic Forwarding Algorithms , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[13]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Information flow in social groups , 2003, cond-mat/0305305.

[14]  C. McLean,et al.  A framework for modeling and simulation for emergency response , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 2003..

[15]  Tristan Henderson,et al.  The changing usage of a mature campus-wide wireless network , 2004, MobiCom '04.

[16]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[17]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Exploiting Social Interactions in Mobile Systems , 2007, UbiComp.

[18]  A. Pentland.  Automatic mapping and modeling of human networks , 2007 .

[19]  Tristan Henderson,et al.  CRAWDAD: A Community Resource for Archiving Wireless Data at Dartmouth , 2005, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[20]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[21]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  Mining behavioral groups in large wireless LANs , 2006, MobiCom '07.