Defining a common set of indicators to monitor road accidents in the European Union

Backgroundcurrently road accidents are mostly monitored through mortality and injury rates. This paper reports the methodology and the results of a project set forth by the European Union (EU) and coordinated by the WHO aimed at identifying and evaluating a core set of indicators to monitor the causal chain of road accident health effects. The project is part of the ECOEHIS (Development of Environment and Health Indicators for European Union Countries).Methodsa group of experts (WG), identified 14 indicators after a review of the information collected at the EU level, each of them representing a specific aspect of the DPSEEA (Driving, Pressure, State, Exposure, Effect, Action) model applied and adapted to the road accidents.Each indicator was scored according to a list of 16 criteria chosen by the WG. Those found to have a high score were analysed to determine if they were compatible with EU legislation and then tested in the feasibility study.Results11 of the 14 indicators found to be relevant and compatible with the criteria of selection were proposed for the feasibility study. Mortality, injury, road accident rate, age of vehicle fleet, and distance travelled are the indicators recommended for immediate implementation.Conclusionafter overcoming the limitations that emerged (absence of a common definition of death by road accident and injury severity, underestimation of injuries, differences in information quality) this core set of indicators will allow Member States to carry out effective internal/external comparisons over time.

[1]  A Baruya,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF DRIVERS' SPEED ON THE FREQUENCY OF ROAD ACCIDENTS , 2000 .

[2]  Pnuma,et al.  Linkage methods for environment and health analysis, general guidelines: a report of the Health and Environment Analysis for Decision-making (HEADLAMP) project , 1996 .

[3]  Gabriella Guasticchi,et al.  Road traffic injuries in Lazio, Italy: a descriptive analysis from an emergency department-based surveillance system. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  Margaret M. Peden,et al.  World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention , 2004 .

[5]  M. Petticrew,et al.  What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[6]  D. Rosman,et al.  Comparison of accident and emergency with police road injury data. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  O T Holubowycz,et al.  ALCOHOL AND THE RISK OF ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT , 1981 .

[8]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety , 1988 .

[9]  R Ian,et al.  School based driver education for the prevention of traffic crashes. , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  T. Woodruff,et al.  Indicators of Children??s Health and the Environment in North America , 2006 .

[11]  N. Homedes The disability-adjusted life year (DALY) definition, measurement and potential use , 1996 .

[12]  S D Ferrara,et al.  Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety. , 1987, British journal of addiction.

[13]  M. Guarnieri,et al.  Accidents and acts of God: a history of the terms. , 1996, American Journal of Public Health.