Defining the Fundamental Framework of an Effective Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) Contract

Abstract: Highly capital-intensive systems in domains such as transportation, infrastructure, defense and aerospace, and telecom have long operational life cycles and their stakeholders expect them to exhibit the necessary operational and performance characteristics during these long operational life spans. Often the results have been less than satisfactory, which has led many to envision alternative approaches to effectively sustaining such systems. Among the alternative approaches is Performance Based Logistics (PBL), whose essence is to define key system readiness and effectiveness criteria and to contract for threshold values of these criteria. The emphasis is in contracting for results, and not for resources as traditionally done. This article is based on a literature survey conducted on the papers published in connection with this topic since the advent of the PBL initiative, as well as on numerous personal interviews entertained in programs in which the authors have been involved, and briefly surveys current practices in PBL-based contracting, highlighting the lessons learned and outlining the primary drawbacks observed. Finally this article proposes a framework for formulating more efficient and effective PBL contractual agreements and identifies the main topics or aspects of a successful PBL initiative. Experience shows that in order for a PBL contract to yield the desired results it is essential to have a thorough agreement on the metrics to be used to represent system effectiveness, as well as an agreed reward scheme that links reward to achieved effectiveness.

[1]  Nils Fearnley,et al.  Estimation and Implementation of Optimal Performance-Based Subsidies in Norwegian Intercity Rail Transport , 2003 .

[2]  R. E. Brown,et al.  Managing the risk of performance based rates , 2000 .

[3]  A. Bubshait Incentive/disincentive contracts and its effects on industrial projects , 2003 .

[4]  B. Cunic Performance-based contracting : Plant design and engineering , 2003 .

[5]  Jeroen Voeten,et al.  Performance evaluation with temporal rewards , 2002, Perform. Evaluation.

[6]  Lou Kratz Designing and Assessing Supportability in DOD Weapon Systems: A Guide to Increased Reliability and Reduced Logistics Footprint , 2003 .

[7]  T.C. Smith Reliability growth planning under performance based logistics , 2004, Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS.

[8]  Robert L. K. Tiong,et al.  A Fuzzy Decision Framework for Contractor Selection , 2005 .

[9]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  An Overview of Incentive Contracting , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Mark Forror A WHOLE NEW APPROACH , 1997 .

[11]  Takehiro Inohara,et al.  How to design incentive systems based on the multiple signals from agent's behavior , 1999, IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028).

[12]  T. Ingersoll The effect of performance based incentive plans [IC manufacturing] , 1998, IEEE/SEMI 1998 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop (Cat. No.98CH36168).

[13]  T. Berends Cost plus incentive fee contracting - experiences and structuring , 2000 .

[14]  Xianhai Meng,et al.  Guarantees for Contractor’s Performance and Owner’s Payment in China , 2002 .

[15]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Incorporating reliability index probability distributions in performance based regulation , 2002, IEEE CCECE2002. Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37373).

[16]  James R. Marsden,et al.  Decision making under time pressure with different information sources and performance-based financial incentives - Part 1 , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  M. Tuominen,et al.  Benchmarking logistics performance with an application of the analytic hierarchy process , 1996 .

[18]  R. J. Gilbertson Risk reduction through application of essential performance requirements warranties , 1989, Proceedings of the IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference.

[19]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Performance-based quality contracts for the bus sector: delivering social and commercial value for money , 2004 .

[20]  Tim Ingersoll The Effect of Performance Based Incentive Plans , 1998 .

[21]  James R. Marsden,et al.  Decision-making under time pressure with different information sources and performance-based financial incentives - Part 2 , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  R. Billinton,et al.  Historic performance-based distribution system risk assessment , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.