Abstract The study was carried out at the experimental farm of the Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India, having a sub-humid climate. A weighing type lysimeter of 75 cm diameter and 75 cm height was installed at the center of a 10 m ×10 m experimental plot and daily reference crop evapotranspiration (ET 0 ) was measured with an electronic datalogger connected to the lysimeter. Grass was used as the reference crop for observing the actual ET. A total of 10 climatological methods were selected for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration on a daily basis. Some of these methods are based on combination theory and others are empirical methods based primarily on solar radiation, temperature and relative humidity. All the methods were originally developed for a well watered reference crop, either alfalfa or grass. An attempt was made in the current study to develop regional relationships between the evapotranspiration measured by the lysimeter and that estimated by the climatological methods, such as Penman, FAO–Penman, FAO–Corrected–Penman, 1982-Kimberley–Penman, Penman–Monteith, Turc–Radiation, Priestley–Taylor, FAO–Radiation, Hargreaves and FAO–Blaney–Criddle. Performance of the climatological methods in estimating the ET 0 values as compared to the lysimeter-measured values was evaluated on the basis of root mean square error (RMSE). Almost all combination methods performed quite well. Radiation methods also gave good results but the ET 0 values estimated by these methods did not match closely with the measured ET 0 values unlike those estimated by the combination methods. The Penman–Monteith equation gave the best result followed by 1982-Kimberly–Penman, FAO–Penman, Turc–Radiation and FAO–Blaney–Criddle. The RMSE in all the cases varied between 0.08 and 0.756. Crop-coefficients ( K c ) were estimated for potato crop at different stages of growth, at the same location, based on lysimeter measured actual ET and the reference crop evapotranspiration estimated by various methods. The measured values of crop-coefficient for potato crop at four stages of growth, such as initial, crop development, reproductive and maturity were 0.42, 0.85, 1.27 and 0.57, respectively. The K c value at the maturity stage was found to be considerably higher than the corresponding FAO recommended K c value.
[1]
H. L. Penman.
Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass
,
1948,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
[2]
C. Priestley,et al.
On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters
,
1972
.
[3]
Z. Samani,et al.
Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration
,
1982
.
[4]
H. L. Penman,et al.
Vegetation and hydrology
,
1963
.
[5]
J. Doorenbos,et al.
Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements
,
1977
.
[6]
George H. Hargreaves,et al.
Agricultural Benefits for Senegal River Basin
,
1985
.
[7]
G. Fogg.
The state and movement of water in living organisms.
,
1966,
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.
[8]
James L. Wright,et al.
New Evapotranspiration Crop Coefficients
,
1982
.
[9]
R. L. Snyder,et al.
An evaluation of common evapotranspiration equations
,
1999,
Irrigation Science.
[10]
S. K. Luthra,et al.
Determination of evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of rice and sunflower with lysimeter
,
2000
.
[11]
George H. Hargreaves,et al.
Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature
,
1985
.
[12]
Marvin E. Jensen,et al.
Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration
,
1989
.
[13]
L. S. Pereira,et al.
Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements
,
1998
.