Hemispheric Organization of Visual Memories

This study investigates the hemispheric organization of visual memories. In five experiments, we examine the processes associated with the recognition of line patterns that are flashed laterally during a study phase. The first three experiments demonstrate a recognition advantage for patterns presented at test in the same (rather than in the opposite) hemifield in which they were presented during a previous study phase. This difference was obtained even when stimuli were presented in different locations within the same hemifield. Experiment shows that patterns presented centrally during the recognition phase elicit ERPs that are systematically more negative over the hemisphere contralateral to the side at which they were presented during the study phase. In Experiment 5, however, we found that subjects were unable to indicate the side of initial presentation of the patterns. The results suggest that the memory traces left by laterally presented stimuli are more easily accessible in the contralateral hemisphere, which suggests a contralateral organization of visual memories.

[1]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  J. Deese.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  H. Jasper.  Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .

[4]  David LaBerge,et al.  Thalamic and Cortical Mechanisms of Attention Suggested by Recent Positron Emission Tomographic Experiments , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  S. Zeki.  The visual image in mind and brain. , 1992, Scientific American.

[6]  A Treisman,et al.  Implicit and explicit memory for visual patterns. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  S. Sternberg.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 1966, Science.

[8]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Event-related brain potentials. , 1990 .

[9]  Lillian Leiber.  Interhemispheric Effects in Short-Term Recognition Memory for Single Words , 1982, Cortex.

[10]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  Methods for the quantification and statistical testing of ERP differences across conditions , 1998 .

[11]  E. Donchin,et al.  COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY: THE ENDOGENOUS COMPONENTS OF THE ERP , 1978 .

[12]  I. Biederman,et al.  Evidence for Complete Translational and Reflectional Invariance in Visual Object Priming , 1991, Perception.

[13]  E. Tulving,et al.  Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. , 1970 .

[14]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[15]  M. Banich,et al.  Investigations of interhemispheric processing: Methodological considerations. , 1994 .

[16]  M. Mishkin.  A memory system in the monkey. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M. Banich,et al.  Dissociations in memory for item identify and item frequency: Evidence from hemispheric interactions , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  K. Leibovic,et al.  Binocular space and its representation by cellular assemblies in the brain. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and mind , 1982 .

[21]  G. Gratton,et al.  Dynamic brain imaging: Event-related optical signal (EROS) measures of the time course and localization of cognitive-related activity , 1998 .

[22]  R. W. Little,et al.  Inter-hemispheric Transfer of Meaningful Visual Information in Normal Human Subjects , 1973, Nature.

[23]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Brain Potentials during Memory Retrieval Provide Neurophysiological Support for the Distinction between Conscious Recollection and Priming , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[25]  P. Pala,et al.  Domain interactions of H–2 class I antigens alter cytotoxic T-cell recognition sites , 1984, Nature.

[26]  D. Hood,et al.  Shades of gray matter: noninvasive optical images of human brain responses during visual stimulation. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[27]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[28]  J. M. Vanderplas,et al.  Deficits in recognition of random shapes with changed visual fields , 1965 .

[29]  L. Mulder,et al.  Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  G Gratton,et al.  The contralateral organization of visual memory: a theoretical concept and a research tool. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[32]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  The search for the engram. , 1976, The American psychologist.

[33]  G. Gratton,et al.  Memory-driven processing in human medial occipital cortex: an event-related optical signal (EROS) study. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[34]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  S. Corkin,et al.  Intact priming of patterns despite impaired memory , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[37]  R. Desimone,et al.  A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. , 1991, Science.

[38]  H. Roediger,et al.  Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account , 1989 .

[39]  M. Coles.  Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[40]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[41]  S. Dimond,et al.  Cross field and within field integration of visual information. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  D. Regan.  Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[43]  D. Schacter.  Understanding implicit memory. A cognitive neuroscience approach. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[44]  P J Reber,et al.  Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potential studies of human memory , 1995 .

[46]  A. Belger,et al.  Inter- versus intrahemispheric concordance of judgments in a nonexplicit memory task , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[47]  L. Squire.  Mechanisms of memory. , 1986, Lancet.

[48]  E. Donchin,et al.  “P300” and memory: Individual differences in the von Restorff effect , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  H. Spinnler,et al.  Interaction between lateralization of memory and probe stimulus in the recognition of verbal and spatial visual stimuli , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .