Numerical assessment of the core deformability effect on the behavior of sandwich beams

Abstract A modified zig-zag technical theory suitable for the accurate analysis of multi-layered composite beams accounting for the full 3D stress state has been recently developed by one of the authors [U. Icardi, A three-dimensional zig zag theory for analysis of thick laminated beams. In: Modern Trends in the Theory and Behavior of Structures Symposium ASME 1999 Summer Conference, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, 27– 30 June 1999]. In order to satisfy the transverse shear and the transverse normal stress and stress gradient continuity requirements at the laminae interfaces through appropriate jumps in the strains, the theory features a piecewise third-order approximation for the in-plane displacement and a fourth-order approximation for the transverse displacement across the thickness. In the present paper, the capability of such a theory to predict the displacement and stress distribution across the thickness of sandwich beams is numerically assessed. This is done by comparing present estimates with the Pagano's elasticity solution [N.J. Pagano, J. Compos. Mater. 3 (1969) 398–411] for simply-supported, sandwich beams with cross-ply faces, loaded by a sinusoidally distributed transverse load. Additional results are presented that evidence the effects played by an enhanced core's deformability, or by stiffening the faces. It is seen from the numerical results presented the need for including non-classical complicating effects, to accurately predict the stress and displacement distributions across the thickness, and even for the estimation of the overall response. These comprise modeling of the transverse normal strain and transverse shear deformation; fulfillment of the transverse shear stress and transverse normal stress and stress gradient continuity conditions at interfaces; modeling of the cross-section warping. The numerical results show a good predictive capability of the present model with using one sublaminate for each layer and for the core, except for the case of faces with drastically different elastic moduli, which require use of more sublaminates.

[1]  T. K. Varadan,et al.  Refinement of higher-order laminated plate theories , 1989 .

[2]  S. Soni,et al.  Vibration of beams made of variable thickness layers , 1979 .

[3]  Ronald C. Averill,et al.  Static and dynamic response of moderately thick laminated beams with damage , 1994 .

[4]  Venkat Aitharaju.  C0 Zigzag Kinematic Displacement Models for the Analysis of Laminated Composites , 1999 .

[5]  L. Librescu,et al.  Effects of Interfacial Damage on the Global and Local Static Response of Cross-Ply Laminates , 1999 .

[6]  M. D. Sciuva,et al.  BENDING, VIBRATION AND BUCKLING OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED THICK MULTILAYERED ORTHOTROPIC PLATES: AN EVALUATION OF A NEW DISPLACEMENT MODEL , 1986 .

[7]  R. C. Averill,et al.  Thick beam theory and finite element model with zig-zag sublaminate approximations , 1996 .

[8]  J. N. Reddy,et al.  A generalization of two-dimensional theories of laminated composite plates† , 1987 .

[9]  Hidenori Murakami,et al.  Laminated Composite Plate Theory With Improved In-Plane Responses , 1986 .

[10]  D. K. Rao,et al.  Vibration of short sandwich beams , 1977 .

[11]  Ugo Icardi,et al.  On modeling of global response behavior of sandwich plates with laminated faces , 1996 .

[12]  Marco Di Sciuva,et al.  Multilayered anisotropic plate models with continuous interlaminar stresses , 1992 .

[13]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  Assessment of computational models for multilayered anisotropic plates , 1990 .

[14]  L. Librescu,et al.  Postbuckling of laminated composite and sandwich plates and shells: On the significance of the fulfillment of static interlayer continuity conditions , 1997 .

[15]  J. Reddy,et al.  THEORIES AND COMPUTATIONAL MODELS FOR COMPOSITE LAMINATES , 1994 .

[16]  Maenghyo Cho,et al.  Efficient higher order composite plate theory for general lamination configurations , 1993 .

[17]  H. G. Allen.  Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels , 1969 .

[18]  J. Reddy.  A Simple Higher-Order Theory for Laminated Composite Plates , 1984 .

[19]  Ugo Icardi,et al.  A three-dimensional zig-zag theory for analysis of thick laminated beams , 2001 .

[20]  J. Reddy.  Mechanics of laminated composite plates : theory and analysis , 1997 .

[21]  Dahsin Liu,et al.  An interlaminar stress continuity theory for laminated composite analysis , 1992 .

[22]  Ugo Icardi,et al.  On Modeling of Global and Local Response of Sandwich Plates with Laminated Faces , 2000 .

[23]  Dahsin Liu,et al.  Interlaminar stress continuity theory for laminated composite analysis , 1991 .

[24]  Mohamed Samir Hefzy,et al.  Review of Knee Models , 1988 .

[25]  R. C. Averill,et al.  C0 zig-zag finite element for analysis of laminated composite beams , 1999 .

[26]  Ugo Icardi,et al.  Eight-noded zig-zag element for deflection and stress analysis of plates with general lay-up , 1998 .

[27]  Dahsin Liu,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of composite plates using interlaminar shear stress continuity theory , 1993 .

[28]  G. Jemielita,et al.  On kinematical assumptions of refined theories of plates : a survey , 1990 .

[29]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  Computational Models for Sandwich Panels and Shells , 1996 .

[30]  N. Pagano,et al.  Exact Solutions for Composite Laminates in Cylindrical Bending , 1969 .

[31]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  Assessment of Shear Deformation Theories for Multilayered Composite Plates , 1989 .

[32]  Paolo Gaudenzi,et al.  A finite element evaluation of single-layer and multi-layer theories for the analysis of laminated plates , 1995 .