Technical Note: Radiological properties of tissue surrogates used in a multimodality deformable pelvic phantom for MR-guided radiotherapy.

PURPOSE Phantom surrogates were developed to allow multimodal [computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and teletherapy] and anthropomorphic tissue simulation as well as materials and methods to construct deformable organ shapes and anthropomorphic bone models. METHODS Agarose gels of variable concentrations and loadings were investigated to simulate various soft tissue types. Oils, fats, and Vaseline were investigated as surrogates for adipose tissue and bone marrow. Anthropomorphic shapes of bone and organs were realized using 3D-printing techniques based on segmentations of patient CT-scans. All materials were characterized in dual energy CT and MRI to adapt CT numbers, electron density, effective atomic number, as well as T1- and T2-relaxation times to patient and literature values. RESULTS Soft tissue simulation could be achieved with agarose gels in combination with a gadolinium-based contrast agent and NaF to simulate muscle, prostate, and tumor tissues. Vegetable oils were shown to be a good representation for adipose tissue in all modalities. Inner bone was realized using a mixture of Vaseline and K2HPO4, resulting in both a fatty bone marrow signal in MRI and inhomogeneous areas of low and high attenuation in CT. The high attenuation of outer bone was additionally adapted by applying gypsum bandages to the 3D-printed hollow bone case with values up to 1200 HU. Deformable hollow organs were manufactured using silicone. Signal loss in the MR images based on the conductivity of the gels needs to be further investigated. CONCLUSIONS The presented surrogates and techniques allow the customized construction of multimodality, anthropomorphic, and deformable phantoms as exemplarily shown for a pelvic phantom, which is intended to study adaptive treatment scenarios in MR-guided radiation therapy.

[1]  J Balter,et al.  Patient-induced susceptibility effect on geometric distortion of clinical brain MRI for radiation treatment planning on a 3T scanner , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Errors and margins in radiotherapy. , 2004, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[3]  B. Maldague,et al.  Review article Magnetic resonance imaging of normal bone marrow , 1998 .

[4]  David S Followill,et al.  Design, development, and implementation of the radiological physics center's pelvis and thorax anthropomorphic quality assurance phantoms. , 2007, Medical physics.

[5]  D. R. White,et al.  The composition of body tissues. , 1986, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  N. Rofsky,et al.  MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. , 2004, Radiology.

[7]  J. Pouliot,et al.  A three-dimensional head-and-neck phantom for validation of multimodality deformable image registration for adaptive radiotherapy. , 2014, Medical physics.

[8]  K Wachowicz,et al.  Implications of tissue magnetic susceptibility-related distortion on the rotating magnet in an MR-linac design. , 2010, Medical physics.

[9]  Steffen Greilich,et al.  An anthropomorphic multimodality (CT/MRI) head phantom prototype for end-to-end tests in ion radiotherapy. , 2015, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[10]  Yuko Kitagawa,et al.  Phase I study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with S-1 plus biweekly cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: -KOGC04- , 2014, Radiation Oncology.

[11]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Observations on real-time prostate gland motion using electromagnetic tracking. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Artifacts in 3-T MRI: physical background and reduction strategies. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[13]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  Intrafraction motion of the prostate during external-beam radiation therapy: analysis of 427 patients with implanted fiducial markers. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  T. Kron,et al.  Design, manufacture, and evaluation of an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom purpose-built for radiotherapy dosimetric intercomparison. , 2011, Medical physics.

[16]  Karin Haustermans,et al.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[17]  G. De Meerleer,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) anatomy of the prostate and application of MRI in radiotherapy planning. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[18]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  MR guidance in radiotherapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  S. Delorme,et al.  MR-guidance – a clinical study to evaluate a shuttle- based MR-linac connection to provide MR-guided radiotherapy , 2014, Radiation oncology.

[20]  K. Vigen,et al.  Tissue mimicking materials for a multi-imaging modality prostate phantom. , 2001, Medical physics.

[21]  Tufve Nyholm,et al.  Systematisation of spatial uncertainties for comparison between a MR and a CT-based radiotherapy workflow for prostate treatments , 2009, Radiation oncology.

[22]  Steffen Greilich,et al.  Experimental verification of ion stopping power prediction from dual energy CT data in tissue surrogates , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Feasibility of polymer gel dosimetry measurements in a dynamic porcine lung phantom , 2015 .

[24]  M. Herk Errors and margins in radiotherapy. , 2004 .

[25]  Brian M Dale,et al.  Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  A deformable head and neck phantom with in-vivo dosimetry for adaptive radiotherapy quality assurance. , 2015, Medical physics.

[27]  K. Brock Results of a multi-institution deformable registration accuracy study (MIDRAS). , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  R. Steenbakkers,et al.  Reduction of dose delivered to the rectum and bulb of the penis using MRI delineation for radiotherapy of the prostate. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  Filip Claus,et al.  Interobserver Delineation Variation Using CT versus Combined CT + MRI in Intensity–Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer , 2005, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[30]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Target definition in prostate, head, and neck. , 2005, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[31]  J. Mintorovitch,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Properties of MRI Contrast Media Solutions at Different Magnetic Field Strengths , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[32]  A J Lomax,et al.  Experimental verification of IMPT treatment plans in an anthropomorphic phantom in the presence of delivery uncertainties , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[34]  Koichi Shibuya,et al.  Development of MRI phantom equivalent to human tissues for 3.0-T MRI. , 2013, Medical physics.

[35]  L. Axel,et al.  Agarose as a tissue equivalent phantom material for NMR imaging. , 1986, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[36]  B. Beck,et al.  Tissue‐equivalent phantoms for high frequencies , 2004 .

[37]  T. Foster,et al.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.