Effects of environmental uncertainty on organizational intention to adopt distributed work arrangements

Uncertainty in the external environmental context has been shown to affect organizational change and innovation. Distributed work arrangement is an organizational innovation that has the potential to enable a firm to meet the challenges of an uncertain environment more effectively. With the emergence of virtual organizations, such work arrangements are likely to gain increasing popularity. This exploratory empirical study employs a structural model to examine how environmental uncertainty affects organizational predisposition (adoption intention) toward distributed work arrangements. Environmental uncertainty has two different dimensions: environmental complexity (heterogeneity) and environmental variability (dynamism). In this paper, environmental dimensions are modeled to influence adoption of distributed work arrangements through shaping the organizational perceptions of three innovation characteristics: perceived relative advantage, compatibility and complexity. Data analyses using partial least squares statistical technique revealed that environmental complexity is negatively associated with perceived relative advantage, and perceived compatibility. Perceived relative advantage and perceived compatibility are in turn positively related to adoption intention for distributed work arrangements. However, environmental variability has no significant effect on the three innovation characteristics. Contrary to past findings that suggest organizations are more predisposed toward innovations in a complex environment, our study found that organizations in an environment of lower, rather than higher complexity are more likely to adopt distributed work arrangements. Implications for organizations are discussed.

[1]  Mike Johnson Managing in the next millennium , 1995 .

[2]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Innovation Diffusion Theory as a Predictor of Adoption Intention for Financial EDI , 1995, ICIS.

[3]  F. Damanpour Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[4]  Sajda Qureshi,et al.  Adaptiveness in Virtual Teams: Organisational Challenges and Research Directions , 2001 .

[5]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Purchase Intentions and the Dimensions of Innovation: An Exploratory Model , 1990 .

[6]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  After-Hours Telecommuting and Work-Family Conflict: A Comparative Analysis , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Conceptual issues in the study of innovation , 1976 .

[8]  V. Grover An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems* , 1993 .

[9]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Ian M. Mitchell,et al.  Strategic Organization Design: Concepts, Tools & Processes , 1990 .

[11]  B. Boyd,et al.  Executive Scanning and Perceived Uncertainty: A Multidimensional Model , 1996 .

[12]  A. Venkatesh,et al.  An emerging distributed work arrangement: an investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home , 1992 .

[13]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Contingency Theory: Some Suggested Directions , 1984 .

[14]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[15]  S Finkelstein,et al.  Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[16]  Linda Duxbury,et al.  Predicting alternative work arrangements from salient attitudes: A study of decision makers in the public sector☆ , 1991 .

[17]  M. Aiken,et al.  Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. , 1967 .

[18]  Lynn Isabella,et al.  Top Management Team Certainty: Environmental Assessments, Teamwork, and Performance Implications , 1994 .

[19]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[20]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Attitudes toward telecommuting: Implications for work-at-home programs , 1984, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Susan J. Harrington,et al.  Telework: an innovation where nobody is getting on the bandwagon? , 1995, DATB.

[22]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[23]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Strategy implementation : structure, systems, and process , 1986 .

[24]  Larry Hirschhorn,et al.  Beyond mechanization: Work and technology in a postindustrial age , 1984 .

[25]  Donald L. Amoroso,et al.  Testing a Causal Model of End-User Application Effectiveness , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  L. Delbeke Quasi-experimentation - design and analysis issues for field settings - cook,td, campbell,dt , 1980 .

[27]  Rosann Webb Collins,et al.  Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Shirley Terreberry The Evolution of Organizational Environments , 1968 .

[29]  Simon Robinson,et al.  Telework : present situation and future development of a new form of work organization , 1988 .

[30]  Frances J. Milliken Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: An examination of college administrators''interpre , 1990 .

[31]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[32]  F. Aguilar Scanning the business environment , 1967 .

[33]  Claes Fornell,et al.  A second generation of multivariate analysis , 1982 .

[34]  J. Gentry,et al.  Characteristics of Adopters and Non-Adopters of Home Computers , 1983 .

[35]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Jerald Hage,et al.  Organizational and Technological Predictors of Change in automaticity , 1988 .

[37]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[38]  John Child,et al.  Organizational Design and Performance: Contingency Theory and Beyond. , 1977 .

[39]  E. Rogers,et al.  Innovations and Organizations , 1988 .

[40]  Nicholas S. Vonortas The Process of Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[41]  Lotte Bailyn,et al.  Toward the perfect workplace? , 1989, CACM.

[42]  飯沼 光夫,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management : 抄録雑誌の概要 , 1987 .

[43]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[44]  Ruth A. Guthrie The Ethics of Telework , 1997, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[45]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizational Architecture: Designs for Changing Organizations , 1992 .

[46]  James N. Baron,et al.  Organizational Blueprints for Success in High-Tech Start-Ups: Lessons from the Stanford Project on Emerging Companies , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[47]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[48]  R. Daft,et al.  Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study , 1988 .

[49]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[50]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[51]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[52]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Designing Organizations that Have Good Fit: A Framework for Understanding New Architectures , 1992 .

[53]  Thomas C. Kinnear,et al.  Exploring the Consumer Decision Process in the Adoption of Solar Energy Systems , 1981 .

[54]  Paul Ati ' Ewell TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[55]  Danny Miller,et al.  Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit , 1992 .

[56]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[57]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: four cases in the microcomputer industry , 1988 .

[58]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Environmental uncertainty and organizational technology policy , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[59]  Susan J. Harrington,et al.  Practical and value compatibility: their roles in the adoption, diffusion, and success of telecommuting , 1999, ICIS.

[60]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  Organizational Policy and Innovation Among Suppliers to the Food Processing Sector , 1983 .

[61]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Incentives and Computing Systems for Team-Based Organizations , 1995 .

[62]  E. Hirschman Symbolism and Technology As Sources For the Generation of Innovations , 1982 .

[63]  Donald Tomaskovic-Devey,et al.  Telecommuting innovation and organization: a contingency theory of labor process change , 1993 .

[64]  Aneil K. Mishra,et al.  Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. , 1995 .

[65]  R. Duncan Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[66]  D. A. Bell,et al.  Applied Statistics , 1953, Nature.

[67]  E. Trist,et al.  The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments , 1965 .

[68]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Enabling New Organizational Forms: A Changing Perspective on Infrastructure , 1996, International Conference on Interaction Sciences.

[69]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[70]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Strategy‐making and environment: The third link , 1983 .

[71]  G. Rice,et al.  Decision Theory and the Small Businessman , 1979 .

[72]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[73]  W Q Judge,et al.  Antecedents and Outcomes of Decision Speed in Different Environmental Contexts , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[74]  R. Weber,et al.  Information systems planning: a model and empirical tests , 1996 .

[75]  Margrethe H. Olson,et al.  Remote office work: changing work patterns in space and time , 1983, CACM.

[76]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation , 1977 .

[77]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[78]  Paul M. Swamidass,et al.  Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: a path analytic model , 1987 .

[79]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Up and Running. Integrating Information Technology and the Organization , 1991, J. Inf. Technol..

[80]  T. Somers,et al.  Telecommuting: problems associated with communications technologies and their capabilities , 1995 .

[81]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology , 1974, Science.

[82]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Factors of success for end-user computing , 1988, CACM.

[83]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[84]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[85]  R. Zmud An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work , 1984 .

[86]  R. Frank Falk,et al.  A Primer for Soft Modeling , 1992 .

[87]  B. Shamir,et al.  Work-at-home and the quality of working life: some theoretical considerations , 1985 .

[88]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Process of Technological Innovation Within the Firm , 1971 .

[89]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  The environment/organization/person contingency model : a meso approach to the study of organizations , 1992 .

[90]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[91]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  The Change Masters: Innovations for Productivity in the American Corporation , 1983 .

[92]  Sridhar Narasimhan,et al.  Communication and Coordination in the Virtual Office , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[93]  A. Rasheed,et al.  Rational decision‐making and firm performance: the moderating role of the environment , 1997 .

[94]  J. Child Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[95]  D. Hambrick Environmental scanning and organizational strategy , 1982 .

[96]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Configurations of Manufacturing Strategy, Business Strategy, Environment and Structure , 1996 .

[97]  J. Cockcroft The process of technological innovation , 1965 .

[98]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[99]  Tom Fookes,et al.  New Books and Publications: What Happens to Innovative Thinking in Planning Offices? The Change Masters: Innovation for Productivity in the American Corporation, Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1983 , 1985 .

[100]  Pascal Sieber Virtuality as a Strategic Approach for Small and Medium Sized IT Companies to Stay Competitive in a Global Market , 1996, ICIS.

[101]  F. Damanpour Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models , 1996 .

[102]  Frances J. Milliken Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty , 1987 .

[103]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[104]  James R. Freeland,et al.  Structuring Information Flow to Enhance Innovation , 1972 .

[105]  J. Dutton,et al.  Discerning threats and opportunities. , 1988 .

[106]  E. O'Connor,et al.  Gaining Advanced Manufacturing Technologies' Benefits: The Roles of Organization Design and Culture , 1992 .

[107]  R. A. Grant,et al.  Building and testing a causal model of an information technology's impact , 1989, ICIS '89.

[108]  L. Bourgeois STRATEGIC GOALS, PERCEIVED UNCERTAINTY, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE IN VOLATILE ENVIRONMENTS , 1985 .

[109]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. , 1990 .