The Levels of Evidence and Their Role in Evidence-Based Medicine

As the name suggests, evidence-based medicine (EBM), is about finding evidence and using that evidence to make clinical decisions. A cornerstone of EBM is the hierarchical system of classifying evidence. This hierarchy is known as the levels of evidence. Physicians are encouraged to find the highest level of evidence to answer clinical questions. Several papers published in Plastic Surgery journals concerning EBM topics have touched on this subject. 1–6 Specifically, previous papers have discussed the lack of higher level evidence in PRS and need to improve the evidence published in the journal. Before that can be accomplished, it is important to understand the history behind the levels and how they should be interpreted. This paper will focus on the origin of levels of evidence, their relevance to the EBM movement and the implications for the field of plastic surgery as well as the everyday practice of plastic surgery.

[1]  D. Deapen,et al.  Cancer Risk among Los Angeles Women with Cosmetic Breast Implants , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  J. Concato,et al.  Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  D. Cooney,et al.  Do Not Use Epinephrine in Digital Blocks: Myth or Truth? Part II. A Retrospective Review of 1111 Cases , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? , 2006 .

[5]  J. Friedberg,et al.  Breast Lymphoma Associated With Breast Implants: Two Case-reports and a Review of the Literature , 2002, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[6]  B. Kaplan,et al.  Primary breast lymphoma in a patient with silicone breast implants: a case report and review of the literature. , 2008, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[7]  C. McCarthy,et al.  Where Do We Find the Best Evidence? , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  D. Lalonde,et al.  A multicenter prospective study of 3,110 consecutive cases of elective epinephrine use in the fingers and hand: the Dalhousie Project clinical phase. , 2005, The Journal of hand surgery.

[9]  S. Sprague,et al.  Study design and hierarchy of evidence for surgical decision making. , 2008, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[10]  D. Sackett,et al.  Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. , 1989, Chest.

[11]  E H Schemitsch,et al.  Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  The periodic health examination. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. , 1979, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[13]  R. Sataloff.  Quality of Reporting in Randomized Trials , 2010, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[14]  J. Mclaughlin,et al.  Breast Implants and Lymphoma Risk: A Review of the Epidemiologic Evidence through 2008 , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  G H Guyatt,et al.  USERS' GUIDES TO THE MEDICAL LITERATURE. II: HOW TO USE AN ARTICLE ABOUT THERAPY OR PREVENTION A. ARE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY VALID ? , 1993 .

[16]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users' Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 2000, JAMA.

[17]  P. Villeneuve,et al.  Cancer incidence in a cohort of Ontario and Quebec women having bilateral breast augmentation , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[18]  M. Bhandari,et al.  The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000 , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  D. Lalonde,et al.  A Critical Look at the Evidence for and against Elective Epinephrine Use in the Finger , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  R. Feddersen,et al.  Anaplastic large cell lymphoma arising in a silicone breast implant capsule: a case report and review of the literature. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[21]  Frederick B. Loiselle,et al.  Levels of Evidence in Plastic Surgery Research over 20 Years , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  R. Hoover,et al.  Cancer risk at sites other than the breast following augmentation mammoplasty. , 2001, Annals of epidemiology.

[23]  J. Mclaughlin,et al.  Incidence of breast and other cancers among Finnish women with cosmetic breast implants, 1970-1999. , 2002, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[24]  K. Chung,et al.  Evidence-based medicine: the fourth revolution in American medicine? , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[25]  K. Denkler.  A Comprehensive Review of Epinephrine in the Finger: To Do or Not to Do , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  A. Menter,et al.  Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in association with silicone breast implants. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[27]  K. Chung,et al.  Developing Good Clinical Questions and Finding the Best Evidence to Answer Those Questions , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[28]  A. Katz.  Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Annual checkup revisited. , 1996, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[29]  J. Keech,et al.  Anaplastic T-cell lymphoma in proximity to a saline-filled breast implant. , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[30]  G. Guyatt,et al.  User’s Guide to the Orthopaedic Literature: How to Use an Article About Prognosis , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  J. Miller,et al.  Evidence-Based Surgery Chirurgie factuelle Users ’ guide to evidence-based surgery : how to use an article evaluating surgical interventions , 2001 .

[32]  Rod J. Rohrich.  So you want to be better: the role of evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery. , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[33]  L. Phillips,et al.  Do Not Use Epinephrine in Digital Blocks: Myth or Truth? , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[34]  J. Olsen,et al.  Cancer among Scandinavian women with cosmetic breast implants: A pooled long‐term follow‐up study , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[35]  M. Bhandari,et al.  High-pressure irrigation increases adipocyte-like cells at the expense of osteoblasts in vitro. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[36]  F W Pirruccello,et al.  Plastic and reconstructive surgery. , 1967, IMJ. Illinois medical journal.

[37]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[38]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Users' guide to the surgical literature. How to assess a randomized controlled trial in surgery. , 2004, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[39]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  A Detailed Analysis of Level I Evidence (Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analyses) in Five Plastic Surgery Journals to Date: 1978 to 2009 , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[40]  K. Chung,et al.  The Prevalence of Negative Studies with Inadequate Statistical Power: An Analysis of the Plastic Surgery Literature , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[41]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  Introducing Evidence-Based Medicine to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.