Comparison of Transaxial Source Images and 3-Plane, Thin-Slab Maximal Intensity Projection Images for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis with Using ECG-Gated Cardiac CT

Objective We wanted to compare the transaxial source images with the optimized three plane, thin-slab maximum intensity projection (MIP) images from electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated cardiac CT for their ability to detect hemodynamically significant stenosis (HSS), and we did this by means of performing a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Materials and Methods Twenty-eight patients with a heart rate less than 66 beats per minute and who were undergoing both retrospective ECG-gated cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography were included in this study. The contrast-enhanced CT scans were obtained with a collimation of 16×0.75-mm and a rotation time of 420 msec. The transaxial images were reconstructed at the mid-diastolic phase with a 1-mm slice thickness and a 0.5-mm increment. Using the transaxial images, the slab MIP images were created with a 4-mm thickness and a 2-mm increment, and they covered the entire heart in the horizontal long axis (4 chamber view), in the vertical long axis (2 chamber view) and in the short axis. The transaxial images and MIP images were independently evaluated for their ability to detect HSS. Conventional coronary angiograms of the same study group served as the standard of reference. Four radiologists were requested to rank each image with using a five-point scale (1 = definitely negative, 2 = probably negative, 3 = indeterminate, 4 = probably positive, and 5 = definitely positive) for the presence of HSS; the data were then interpreted using ROC analysis. Results There was no statistical difference in the area under the ROC curve between transaxial images and MIP images for the detection of HSS (0.8375 and 0.8708, respectively; p > 0.05). The mean reading time for the transaxial source images and the MIP images was 116 and 126.5 minutes, respectively. Conclusion The diagnostic performance of the MIP images for detecting HSS of the coronary arteries is acceptable and this technique's ability to detect HSS is comparable to that of the transaxial source images.

[1]  C. Claussen,et al.  Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients. , 2002, European heart journal.

[2]  B. Whiting,et al.  CT data storage reduction by means of compressing projection data instead of images: feasibility study. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  Pedro A. Lemos,et al.  Reliable Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Fast Submillimeter Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2002, Circulation.

[4]  C Georg,et al.  Coronary arteries: retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography with selective optimization of the image reconstruction window. , 2001, Radiology.

[5]  R. Morin,et al.  Image Quality in a Standardized Algorithm for Minimally Invasive Coronary Angiography with Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2003, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  K. Engelmann,et al.  Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. , 2002, Radiology.

[7]  J. Rumberger,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography: ready to kick it up another notch? , 2002, Circulation.

[8]  K D Hopper,et al.  CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  P. V. van Ooijen,et al.  Coronary artery imaging with multidetector CT: visualization issues. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  R B Jeffrey,et al.  Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. , 1994, Radiology.

[11]  Y. Korogi,et al.  Maximum stenosis of extracranial internal carotid artery: effect of luminal morphology on stenosis measurement by using CT angiography and conventional DSA. , 2001, Radiology.

[12]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography , 2001, The Lancet.

[13]  M. Budoff,et al.  Effects of window and threshold levels on the accuracy of three-dimensional rendering techniques in coronary artery electron-beam CT angiography. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[14]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Intravenous coronary angiography using electron beam computed tomography. , 1999, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[15]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Maximum Intensity Projections Versus Source Images for Assessment of Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Breath-Hold Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Elliot K Fishman,et al.  Current concepts in multi-detector row CT evaluation of the coronary arteries: principles, techniques, and anatomy. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  T. Schmitz-Rode,et al.  Value of 3D-volume rendering in the assessment of coronary arteries with retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[18]  S Soimakallio,et al.  Assessment of renal artery stenosis with CT angiography: usefulness of multiplanar reformation, quantitative stenosis measurements, and densitometric analysis of renal parenchymal enhancement as adjuncts to MIP film reading. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  M. Dewey.  Coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. , 2005, JAMA.

[20]  B S Kuszyk,et al.  Three-dimensional spiral CT during arterial portography: comparison of three rendering techniques. , 1995, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[21]  T. Hirai,et al.  CT angiography in vascular intervention for steno-occlusive diseases: role of multiplanar reconstruction and source images. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  J. Soto,et al.  Diagnostic performance of helical CT angiography in trauma to large arteries of the extremities. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.