Identification of some causes of demotivation amongst key stage 4 pupils studying design and technology

IDENTIFICATION OF SOME CAUSES OF DEMOTIVATION AMONGST KEY STAGE 4 PUPILS STUDYING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY E. Stephanie Atkinson 1997 Lbstract This research project set out to identify some of the causes of demotivation amongst Key Stage 4 pupils studying design and technology for their GCSE examinations and to propose strategies that teachers could adopt in order to overcome the situation. Design and technology in schools requires pupils to apply a complex integration of processes, concepts, knowledge and skills in order to develop solutions to practical problems. As the subject area has developed, so has the use of the design process as a method of delivering and examining subject content. Initial research indicated that the investigation of pupils engaged in long term pieces of project work could provide tangible indicators in the identification concerning the causes of pupil demotivation. The research project was divided into three sections: the Initial Survey; Phase One; and Phase Two. The purpose of the Initial Survey was to select a representative and yet manageable sample of schools from which the researcher could collect quantitative and qualitative data pertinent to the project. Eight schools were chosen from an original sample of one hundred and fifty schools located in seven Local Education Authorities in the North East of England. Questionnaires and interviews during Phase One enabled the researcher to develop an understanding of pupil (n = 179) and teacher (n = 8) perceptions regarding pupils' enjoyment and their ability to perform in design and technology project work. Analysis of the data collected identified several key internal and external factors that affected pupil motivation. It also indicated that there was a large proportion of demotivated pupils within the sample. Phase Two was conducted throughout the duration of the pupils engagement with design and technology examination project work. Observation of a new sample of pupils (n = 50) enabled the researcher to add to and clarify the list of selected factors. Educational issues that were seen to affect a teacher's level of motivation were also identified. An exploration of the relationship between all the targeted factors was carried out. This phase of the reasearch also supported the findings of Phase One, in that a large proportion of this new sample were found to be demotivated. The effect of performance upon motivation and motivation upon performance was shown to be an important relationship in the context of the study. Internal attributes such as creativity, goal orientation and cognitive style were each seen to have a marked effect upon a pupils' motivation. A pupil's knowledge, skills and understanding of concepts, particularly regarding the design process, were also found to affect their performance and hence their motivation. Significant gender differences were noted. However influential the internal factors on their own or in various combinations were seen to be, the influence of the identified external factors was found to be substantial. In particular, the analysis indicated the importance of those factors that affected the teachers' own levels of motivation. The relationship between motivated teachers and motivated pupils and demotivated teachers and demotivated pupils was seen to be particularly important. From the analysis of the evidence obtained throughout each stage of the project, three lists of advice for teachers of Key Stage 4 design and technology pupils were devised. The lists were written with the intention of providing teachers with suggestions that could help to improve pupil motivation. The lists were in three categories : general advice applicable to all pupils of design and technology; advice targeted at demotivated low achievers; advice principally for demotivated high achievers.

[1]  B. Weiner Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory , 1974 .

[2]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[3]  C. P. Snow The two cultures : and a second look : an expanded version of 'The two cultures and the scientific revolution' , 1963 .

[4]  Claus J. Tully,et al.  Young People's Attitudes to Technology , 1991 .

[5]  Torben Steeg,et al.  Linking the learning of mathematics, science and technology within key stage 4 of the national curriculum , 1993 .

[6]  E. Torrance The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. , 1988 .

[7]  E. Torrance Non-Test Ways of Identifying the Creatively Gifted , 1962 .

[8]  Calvin W. Taylor Developing Creative Excellence in Students: The Neglected History-Making Ingredient Which Would Keep our Nation From Being at Risk , 1984 .

[9]  Howard G. Denton The Design and Make Task (DMT): some reflections on designing in schools , 1993 .

[10]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[11]  B. K. Down Educational Aims in the Technological Society , 1984 .

[12]  Trevor Davies,et al.  Real contexts for design and technology: the "six counties technology" flexible learning project , 1992 .

[13]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Teacher-student relationships: causes and consequences , 1974 .

[14]  B. Weiner Human Motivation: Metaphors, Theories, and Research , 1980 .

[15]  Bruce Archer,et al.  Design and Technological Awareness in Education , 1979 .

[16]  J. Aitchison,et al.  Technology Projects for Schools , 1975 .

[17]  John Harahan Design in general education : eight projects , 1978 .

[18]  Stuart Pugh,et al.  Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering , 1991 .

[19]  Jean Marie Doane Creativity in Learning , 1981 .

[20]  Can there be creativity without creation? , 1984 .

[21]  Steven W. Garner,et al.  Drawing and Designing - exploration and manipulation through two-dimensional modelling , 1989 .

[22]  H. Denton The group synergetic effect: some observations in relation to design with relevance to schools , 1992 .

[23]  C. Seale,et al.  Option Choice: A Question of Equal Opportunity , 1984 .

[24]  B. Egan How do children perceive the activity of drawing? Some initial observations of children in an infant school , 1995 .

[25]  A critical analysis of the operational aims and objectives for technology for 14 to 16 year olds in England and Wales , 1992 .

[26]  G. Robert J. Hockey Styles, skills and strategies: cognitive variability and its implications for the role of mental models in HCI , 1987, Informatics and Psychology Workshop.

[27]  Catharine Morris Cox,et al.  The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses , 1926 .

[28]  W. Schweigert,et al.  Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology , 2023 .

[29]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles—an overview and integration , 1991 .

[30]  D. Newton,et al.  Young children's perceptions of science and the scientist , 1992 .

[31]  J Chidgey A Critique of the Design Process , 1990 .

[32]  C. Gilligan In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women''s , 1982 .

[33]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[34]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  Type of Instructional Material, Cognitive Style and Learning Performance , 1992 .

[35]  Richard Tufnell Introducing design and communication , 1986 .

[36]  B. Woolnough The Place of Technology in Schools. , 1975 .

[37]  Keith R. Simmonds CDT and TVEI: The New Partnership , 1986 .

[38]  David Pye,et al.  The Nature and Aesthetics of Design , 1978 .

[39]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[40]  Alan Bryman,et al.  Research Methods and Organization Studies , 1989 .

[41]  S. Messick The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice , 1984 .

[42]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[43]  Jim Sage Developing relationships between science and technology in secondary schools , 1992 .

[44]  E. Stephanie Atkinson,et al.  Key factors which affect pupils performance in technology project work , 1994 .

[45]  Margaret Goddard Spear The Biasing Influence of Pupil Sex in a Science Marking Exercise , 1984 .

[46]  Angela Anning Technological capability in primary classrooms , 1993 .

[47]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[48]  B. S. Nicholson Implementing design and technology in the national curriculum , 1990 .

[49]  The role of research in curriculum planning: a case study , 1993 .

[50]  H F HARLOW,et al.  Mice, monkeys, men, and motives. , 1953, Psychological review.

[51]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research , 1982 .

[52]  John Chris Jones,et al.  Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures , 1981 .

[53]  F. Clegg Simple Statistics: A Course Book for the Social Sciences , 1984 .

[54]  R. Osche,et al.  Before the gates of excellence: the determinants of creative genius , 1990 .

[55]  Problem-Solving, CDT and Child-Centredness , 1983 .

[56]  G. Roberts,et al.  Motivation in sport and exercise. , 1992 .

[57]  Douglas S Newton,et al.  Teachers assessing design and technology: An effect of curriculum organisation , 1996 .

[58]  Colin Power,et al.  Aspects of the competence‐performance distinction: Educational, psychological and measurement issues , 1987 .

[59]  Belle Wallace,et al.  Creativity: Some Definitions: the Creative Personality; The Creative Process; the Creative Classroom , 1986 .

[60]  R. Ayres The Technological Revolution. , 1970 .

[61]  Carl Mitcham,et al.  Thinking through Technology , 1994 .

[62]  Rob Johnsey,et al.  Observing the way primary children design and make in the classroom: an analysis of the behaviours exhibited , 1993 .

[63]  Switched Off: the Science Education of Girls , 1983 .

[64]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Creativity: Its Educational Implications , 1981 .

[65]  D. Bromley The case-study method in psychology and related disciplines , 1986 .

[66]  Michael Harrison Modelling in key stages 1 and 2 , 1992 .

[67]  J. Wilkes,et al.  A Cognitive Interpretation of the Marginality and Underrepresentation of Women in Science. , 1989 .

[68]  C. Drew Introduction to Designing and Conducting Research , 1980 .

[69]  M. Wiener,et al.  English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit, 1850-1980. , 1981 .

[70]  John R. Jeffery,et al.  Design Methods in CDT , 1990 .

[71]  H. G. Denton The role of group work in the delivery of Design Technology in the National Curriculum , 1990 .

[72]  Michael Harrison Science in technology: technology in science , 1990 .

[73]  A. Riggs The female perspective on technology , 1993 .

[74]  Peter Toft Evaluating the Craft, Design and Technology Department , 1985 .

[75]  E. Stephanie Atkinson Approaches to designing at key stage 4 , 1995 .

[76]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  THINKING AND CREATIVITY * , 1960, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[77]  A Holistic Conception of Creativity and Its Relationship To Intelligence , 1969 .

[78]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States: , 1979 .

[79]  J. Piaget The Child's Conception of Physical Causality , 1927 .

[80]  Jane Murray The relationship between "modelling" and designing and making with food as a material in design and technology , 1992 .

[81]  Howard Denton Critical point inputs within on-going design and technology project work , 1994 .

[82]  D. Simonton Creativity, leadership, and chance. , 1988 .

[83]  M. Miles Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis , 1979 .

[84]  Frank Pearson,et al.  The Relationship between Cognitive Style and Intelligence , 1994 .

[85]  Roger Standen,et al.  Design and Technology throughout the school curriculum , 1990 .

[86]  Expanding school‐based assessment: issues, problems and future possibilities , 1986 .

[87]  Robert McCormick,et al.  A pilot study of children's problem-solving processes , 1993 .

[88]  A Style of Life, A Life of Style. , 1980 .

[89]  R. Fisher Teaching Children to Think , 1990 .

[90]  James Hartley,et al.  Designing instructional text , 1978 .

[91]  Mark Evans Model or prototype which, when and why? , 1992 .

[92]  T. Amabile,et al.  The conditions of creativity. , 1988 .

[93]  G. Roberts,et al.  Children in sport. , 1992 .

[94]  Alf Massey,et al.  Qualitative records of achievement for school leavers: an alternative approach to the technical issues , 1986 .

[95]  Jere Brophy,et al.  On Motivating Students. Occasional Paper No. 101. , 1986 .

[96]  Teacher stress and cognitive style. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.

[97]  Horace Freeland Judson,et al.  Search for Solutions , 1980 .

[98]  Charles Rubin The Macintosh Bible Guide to Filemaker Pro , 1993 .

[99]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Genius, Creativity and Leadership: Historiometric Inquiries. , 1984 .

[100]  D. Pugh,et al.  How to Get a Phd , 1987 .

[101]  C. Dweck,et al.  An Analysis of Learned Helplessness: Continuous Changes in Performance, Strategy, and Achievement Cognitions Following Failure. , 1978 .

[102]  F. Barron,et al.  Creativity and personal freedom , 1963 .

[103]  Maggie Rogers,et al.  The process diary: developing capability within national curriculum design and technology - some initial findings , 1994 .

[104]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Degrees of excellence: The academic achievement game , 1977 .

[105]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design method and scientific method , 1981 .

[106]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Talent Development vs. Schooling. , 1981 .

[107]  John Morrison,et al.  Design and designing , 1988 .

[108]  Terry Liddament Using models in design & technology education: some conceptual and pedagogic issues , 1993 .

[109]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[110]  George Shield The process approach: a dilemma to be faced in the successful implementation of technology in the National Curriculum , 1995 .

[111]  R. Sternberg A three-facet model of creativity. , 1988 .

[112]  Randolph M. Jones,et al.  A computational model of scientific insight , 1986 .

[113]  John A. Sharp,et al.  The management of a student research project , 1983 .

[114]  Calvin W. Taylor,et al.  Attributes of Excellence in Various Professions: Their Relevance to the Selection of Gifted/Talented Persons , 1985 .

[115]  D. Layton Technology's challenge to science education , 1993 .

[116]  George Shouksmith,et al.  Intelligence, creativity and cognitive style , 1970 .

[117]  Colin C. Tipping Acquiring Design Skills for Teaching - a self-help suggestion , 1983 .

[118]  D. Treffinger Research on Creativity , 1986 .

[119]  Andrew Breckon,et al.  Introducing craft design & technology , 1983 .

[120]  Roger Lamb,et al.  The Dictionary of personality and social psychology , 1986 .

[121]  R. Sternberg The Nature of creativity : contemporary psychological perspectives , 1988 .

[122]  R. D. Webster An evaluation of mixed ability and team teaching methods for the delivery of Avon Modular Design and Technology to all pupils at GCSE , 1993 .