Analysis of Day-to-Day Variability in an Individual's Action Space: Exploration of 6-Week Mobidrive Travel Diary Data

Using 6-week travel diary data from Karlsruhe and Halle, Germany, this study examines the characteristics of individuals' action space. The extension of action space is represented by the second moment of the activity locations that it contains. Day-to-day variation in the second moment is examined. The results show that out-of-home activity orientation and commitment (e.g., obligatory activities on weekdays and discretionary activities on weekend days) influence the extension of action space. For workers and students on weekdays, the spread of activity locations and the distance from home to the centroid of activity locations are relatively stable from day to day. A substantial portion of the variations in their action spaces is due to unexplained differences across individuals that remain stable over time for each individual (unobserved heterogeneity). In contrast, random factors have dominant influences on nonworkers' weekday action spaces and on all individuals' weekend action spaces.

[1]  Karel J. Kansky Travel Patterns of Urban Residents , 1967, Transp. Sci..

[2]  Frank E Horton,et al.  A MARKOVIAN ANALYSIS OF URBAN TRAVEL BEHAVIOR: PATTERN RESPONSE BY SOCIOECONOMIC-OCCUPATIONAL GROUPS , 1969 .

[3]  Torsten Hägerstraand WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[4]  F. E. Horton,et al.  Effects of Urban Spatial Structure on Individual Behavior , 1971 .

[5]  I. Cullen,et al.  Urban Networks: The Structure of Activity Patterns , 1975 .

[6]  N Oppenheim A Typological Approach to Individual Urban Travel Behavior Prediction , 1975 .

[7]  A. Pred 'THE CHOREOGRAPHY OF EXISTENCE: COMMENTS ON HAGERSTRAND'S TIME-GEOGRAPHY AND ITS USEFULNESS , 1977 .

[8]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  BASIC PROPERTIES OF URBAN TIME-SPACE PATHS: EMPIRICAL TESTS , 1981 .

[9]  J. Friedrichs,et al.  Action Spaces of Urban Residents: An Empirical Study in the Region of Hamburg , 1982 .

[10]  Susan Hanson,et al.  ASSESSING DAY-TO-DAY VARIABILITY IN COMPLEX TRAVEL PATTERNS , 1982 .

[11]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  Travel Probability Fields and Urban Spatial Structure: 1. Theory , 1983 .

[12]  P. Jones,et al.  Understanding Travel Behaviour , 1983 .

[13]  W.W. Recker,et al.  A MODEL OF COMPLEX TRAVEL BEHAVIOR: PART I. THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT , 1985 .

[14]  E. I. Pas Weekly travel-activity behavior , 1988 .

[15]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity‐based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems , 1992 .

[16]  R. Kitamura An Analysis of Weekly Activity Patterns and Travel Expenditure , 1998 .

[17]  Martin Dijst,et al.  Two-earner families and their action spaces: A case study of two dutch communities , 1999 .

[18]  Satoshi Fujii,et al.  Rule-based versus utility-maximizing models of activity-travel patterns , 2000 .

[19]  M. Dijst,et al.  Travel time ratio: the key factor of spatial reach , 2000 .

[20]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Pattern Recognition in Complex Activity Travel Patterns: Comparison of Euclidean Distance, Signal-Processing Theoretical, and Multidimensional Sequence Alignment Methods , 2001 .

[21]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Observing the rhythms of daily life: A six-week travel diary , 2002 .

[22]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity spaces: Measures of social exclusion? , 2003 .

[23]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Spatial context and the complexity of daily travel patterns: an international comparison , 2003 .

[24]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  What about people in geographic information science? , 2003, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..