Phonological Variant Recognition: Representations and Rules

The current research explores the role of lexical representations and processing in the recognition of phonological variants. Two alternative approaches for variant recognition are considered: a representational approach that posits frequency-graded lexical representations for variant forms and inferential processes that mediate between the spoken variant and the lexical representation. In a lexical decision task (Experiment 1) and in a phoneme identification task (Experiment 2) using real words, low-frequency variants, but not high-frequency variants, show improved recognition rates following additional experience with the variants. This knowledge generalized to novel variant forms. Experiment 3 replicated these results using an artificial lexicon and showed that recognition of low-frequency variants was influenced by similarity to a high-frequency variant form. Similarity to a high-frequency variant alone, however, was insufficient to explain recognition of the infrequent variants (Experiments 4 and 5). The results support a hybrid account of variant recognition that relies on both multiple frequency-graded representations and inference processes.

[1]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  Lexical representation of phonological variation in spoken word recognition , 2007 .

[2]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[3]  C M Connine,et al.  Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Mark A Pitt,et al.  How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[5]  A. Salasoo,et al.  Building permanent memory codes: codification and repetition effects in word identification. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  David Patterson,et al.  Corpora Analyses of Frequency of Schwa Deletion in Conversational American English , 2003, Phonetica.

[7]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Paul A Luce,et al.  Representation of lexical form. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  J. Pierrehumbert.  The statistical basis of an unnatural alternation , 2005 .

[10]  Valerie Hazan,et al.  SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND EXEMPLAR THEORY , 2007 .

[11]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Listening experience and phonetic-to-lexical mapping in L2 , 2007 .

[12]  Jakke Tamminen,et al.  Short Article: Newly Learned Spoken Words Show Long-Term Lexical Competition Effects , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Meghan Sumner,et al.  Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/ , 2005 .

[14]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[17]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  Rule-governed missing information in spoken word recognition: Schwa vowel deletion , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  M. Gaskell,et al.  Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words , 2003, Cognition.

[19]  Sarah C. Creel,et al.  Acquiring an artificial lexicon: Segment type and order information in early lexical entries , 2006 .

[20]  A. Samuel,et al.  The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants , 2009 .

[21]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  Phonological variation in spoken word recognition: Episodes and abstractions , 2006 .

[22]  Cynthia M Connine,et al.  Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Cynthia M Connine,et al.  It’s not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  M K Tanenhaus,et al.  Eye Movements and Lexical Access in Spoken-Language Comprehension: Evaluating a Linking Hypothesis between Fixations and Linguistic Processing , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[25]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  The next toolkit , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[26]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[27]  J. Pierrehumbert.  Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology , 2003, Language and speech.