Clinical decision support for ovarian tumor diagnosis using Bayesian models: Results from the IOTA study

Many sophisticated methods exist to develop clinical decision support systems for daily clinical practice. In the core medical community, however, researchers often stick to basic methods due to lack of expertise. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) study group, however, aims to explore advanced mathematical modeling options for ovarian tumor diagnosis through interdisciplinary collaborations involving clinicians, statisticians, and engineers. This resulted in several projects involving Bayesian models to distinguish between benign and adnexal ovarian tumors (binary classification). This chapter describes these projects. Major findings are that the classification of ovarian tumors appears to be a fairly linear problem, that benign and malignant tumors can be predicted with high accuracy, that complex black-box models can be further clarified using rule extraction, that input selection incorporating the cost of the available inputs leads to well-performing models with low total input cost, and that the widely used yet controversial and costly CA-125 tumor marker is not indispensable in mathematical diagnostic models. In conclusion, the interdisciplinary approach adopted by IOTA has resulted in useful clinical and technical insights concerning ovarian tumor diagnosis.

[1]  D. Jurkovic,et al.  Simple ultrasound‐based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  M. J. Webb,et al.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the management of benign unilateral adnexal masses. , 2002, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[3]  Adnan Darwiche,et al.  Inference in belief networks: A procedural guide , 1996, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[4]  Patrick Neven,et al.  Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  Orthogonal search-based rule extraction (OSRE) for trained neural networks: a practical and efficient approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[6]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Least Squares Support Vector Machines , 2002 .

[7]  David Mackay,et al.  Probable networks and plausible predictions - a review of practical Bayesian methods for supervised neural networks , 1995 .

[8]  S Van Huffel,et al.  Predicting the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location: Bayesian networks with expert prior information compared to logistic regression. , 2006, Human reproduction.

[9]  Richard E. Neapolitan,et al.  Learning Bayesian networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[10]  Christopher K. I. Williams,et al.  Comparing Bayesian neural network algorithms for classifying segmented outdoor images , 2001, Neural Networks.

[11]  T. Bourne,et al.  Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group , 2000, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[12]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Evaluation of Imputation Methods in Ovarian Tumor Diagnostic Models Using Generalized Linear Models and Support Vector Machines , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[13]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Grand challenges in clinical decision support , 2008, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  Joos Vandewalle,et al.  Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma , 2001, The Lancet.

[15]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Optimizing variable order, selection and cost using a genetic algorithm for modeling ovarian masses with Bayesian networks , 2008 .

[16]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Preoperative prediction of malignancy of ovarian tumors using least squares support vector machines , 2003, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[17]  T. Bourne,et al.  Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Bayesian Framework for Least-Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers, Gaussian Processes, and Kernel Fisher Discriminant Analysis , 2002, Neural Computation.

[19]  Ian T. Nabney,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of Bayesian feature selection , 2005 .

[20]  J. Suykens,et al.  Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors using Bayesian kernel‐based methods , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[21]  A. Sperduti,et al.  A Neural-Based System for the Automatic Classification and Follow-Up of Diabetic Retinopathies , 2000, Artificial Neural Networks in Biomedicine.

[22]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Comparing Analytical Decision Support Models Through Boolean Rule Extraction: A Case Study of Ovarian Tumour Malignancy , 2007, ISNN.

[23]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Inclusion of CA-125 does not improve mathematical models developed to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  S. Van Huffel,et al.  The Bayesian approach: a natural framework for statistical modeling , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[25]  Alessio Micheli,et al.  Machine Learning Contribution to Solve Prognostic Medical Problems , 2007 .

[26]  Alessio Micheli,et al.  An introduction to recursive neural networks and kernel methods for cheminformatics. , 2007, Current pharmaceutical design.

[27]  David Maxwell Chickering,et al.  Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Data , 1994, Machine Learning.