Interpretation of vegetation indices derived from multi-temporal SPOT images

Abstract A temporal sequence of 15 SPOT HRV images and low altitude aircraft reflectance data were obtained over soil and cotton fields at the Maricopa Agricultural Center, Arizona from April to October 1989. The SPOT data included different view angles (− 28° − + 24°) while the aircraft data were obtained with a nadir-viewing radiometer equipped with SPOT filters. View angle/direction, atmosphere, and soil influences on individual band and vegetation indices were observed in the SPOT data. The relative magnitude among the three influences was dependent on surface conditions, varied with canopy growth, and was different for red and near-infrared (NIR) reflectances and vegetation indices (VIs). View angle effects were most pronounced in red and NIR reflectance data and were secondary with the use of VIs. View angle variations, and to some extent soil variations, influenced VI responses from partial canopies while relative atmospheric influences became most dominant at higher densities of vegetation. The results suggest that the current compositing routine for temporal vegetation index imagery may not be entirely adequate.

[1]  Alfredo Huete,et al.  Assessment of vegetation and soil water regimes in partial canopies with optical remotely sensed data. , 1990 .

[2]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Surface Reflectance Factor Retrieval from Thematic Mapper Data , 1989 .

[3]  R. Fraser,et al.  The Relative Importance of Aerosol Scattering and Absorption in Remote Sensing , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Thomas F. Eck,et al.  Atmospheric optical depth effects on angular anisotropy of plant canopy reflectance , 1987 .

[5]  D S Kimes,et al.  Variation of directional reflectance factors with structural changes of a developing alfalfa canopy. , 1982, Applied optics.

[6]  D. Post,et al.  Mapping and Characterization of the Soils on the University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center , 1988 .

[7]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Obtaining Surface Reflectance Factors from Atmospheric and View Angle Corrected SPOT-1 HRV Data , 1990 .

[8]  Philip N. Slater,et al.  Atmospheric effects on radiation reflected from soil and vegetation as measured by orbital sensors using various scanning directions. , 1982, Applied optics.

[9]  L. Biehl,et al.  Variation in spectral response of soybeans with respect to illumination, view, and canopy geometry , 1984 .

[10]  B. Holben.  Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data , 1986 .

[11]  R. Jackson,et al.  Spectral response of a plant canopy with different soil backgrounds , 1985 .

[12]  L. Biehl,et al.  Sun-View Angle Effects on Reflectance Factors of Corn Canopies , 1985 .

[13]  G. Asrar,et al.  Estimating Absorbed Photosynthetic Radiation and Leaf Area Index from Spectral Reflectance in Wheat1 , 1984 .

[14]  Y. Kaufman,et al.  Non-Lambertian Effects on Remote Sensing of Surface Reflectance and Vegetation Index , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Philip N. Slater,et al.  Remote sensing, optics and optical systems , 1980 .

[16]  A. Huete.  A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .