Biofloc technology in aquaculture: Advantages and disadvantages from social and applicability perspectives

Abstract The world aquaculture industry seeks sustainable production strategies to respond to the needs of the growing world population for valuable food. Biofloc technology (BFT) is accepted as a novel sustainable method that reduces the pollution load on receiving water resources with its zero-water-discharge approach, eliminates extra water treatment costs with its biological cycles, and supports the growth performance of reared animals and thereby reduces feed costs. However, each BFT system has its own set of difficulties and obstacles. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of BFT systems in terms of economy, sociability and applicability. The BFT shows more effective results in the conversion of toxic nitrogenous compounds to nontoxic compounds compared with the technologies based on nitrification processes. In addition, the growth performance and health of the cultured animals are generally better in BFT systems than those in conventional rearing systems (continuous water flow). The risk of common diseases occurrence due to pathogenic microorganisms appears to be lower in BFT systems compared to conventional aquaculture. It is also noteworthy that the immune system, biochemical stress indicators and antioxidant activities of organisms held in BFT systems are positively affected. In BFT systems based on microbial activity, the high water temperature demanded by bacteria is a limiter for the system. Moreover, a higher aeration/energy requirement is the case in BFT to meet the oxygen demand of all organisms including fish, shrimp, heterotrophic bacteria, nematodes, rotifers and others inside. There is also another concern about the acceptability potential of the cultured organism in BFT systems for consumption. Finally, since the high temperature demand of the system will create high energy costs, it should be considered as another restriction that forces the application. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of BFT systems as sustainable aquaculture, this review provides a guide for future studies and full-scale implementations.

[1]  M. Dawood,et al.  Various carbon/nitrogen ratios in a biofloc-based rearing system of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings: Effect on growth performance, immune response, and serum biochemistry , 2022 .

[2]  İ. Kurtoğlu,et al.  Occupational Health and Safety Risk Analysis in Trout Aquaculture Facility , 2021, OHS ACADEMY.

[3]  S. Hoseinifar,et al.  Influences of spent coffee grounds on skin mucosal and serum immunities, disease resistance, and growth rate of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared under biofloc system. , 2021, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[4]  İ. Kurtoğlu,et al.  Effects of stocking density during live transportation on haematological parameters of Siberian sturgeon ( Acipenser baerii , Brandt, 1869) , 2021, Journal of Applied Ichthyology.

[5]  M. Dawood,et al.  The influence of carbon source on growth, feed efficiency, and growth-related genes in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared under biofloc conditions and high stocking density , 2021 .

[6]  S. K. Kim,et al.  Effects of artificial substrates on the growth and immunology of postlarvae of Marsupenaeus japonicus (Spence Bate, 1888) (Decapoda: Dendrobranchiata: Penaeidae) reared in biofloc , 2021, Journal of Crustacean Biology.

[7]  M. Emerenciano,et al.  Culture of pacu Piaractus mesopotamicus in biofloc technology (BFT): insights on dietary protein sparing and stomach content , 2021, Aquaculture International.

[8]  S. Otta,et al.  Bioaugmentation of biofloc system with enzymatic bacterial strains for high health and production performance of Penaeus indicus , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[9]  P. Ganesan,et al.  Effects of microbubble aeration on water quality and growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in biofloc system , 2021 .

[10]  Luiz Augusto Cipriani,et al.  Goldfish (Carassius auratus) larviculture in biofloc systems: Level of Artemia nauplii, stocking density and concentration of the bioflocs , 2021, Aquaculture.

[11]  M. Emerenciano,et al.  Sensorial attributes and growth performance of whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) cultured in biofloc technology with varying water salinity and dietary protein content , 2021, Aquaculture.

[12]  Swetambari Kumari,et al.  Growth, biochemical indices and carcass quality of red tilapia reared in zero water discharge based biofloc system in various salinities using inland saline ground water , 2021, Aquaculture.

[13]  M. Sholihah,et al.  Production performance and financial feasibility analysis of farming catfish (Clarias gariepinus) utilizing water exchange system, aquaponic, and biofloc technology , 2021, Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences.

[14]  A. Kubilay,et al.  Operating parameters affecting biofloc technology: carbon source, carbon/nitrogen ratio, feeding regime, stocking density, salinity, aeration, and microbial community manipulation , 2021, Aquaculture International.

[15]  M. Emerenciano,et al.  Use of symbiotics in biofloc (BFT)-based Nile tilapia culture: Production performance, intestinal morphometry and hematological parameters , 2021 .

[16]  Md. Rashed-Un-Nabi,et al.  First use of biofloc technology for Penaeus monodon culture in Bangladesh: Effects of stocking density on growth performance of shrimp, water quality and bacterial growth , 2020 .

[17]  Daniela Delgado,et al.  Proximal and sensory analysis of red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) fed with fish tanks sediments from a Biofloc culture , 2020 .

[18]  H. Younesi,et al.  Comparison between recirculating aquaculture and biofloc systems for rearing juvenile common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ): Growth performance, haemato‐immunological indices, water quality and microbial communities , 2020 .

[19]  V. Tiwari,et al.  Dietary lipid influences gonadal maturation, digestive enzymes and serum biochemical indices of Cyprinus carpio reared in biofloc system , 2020 .

[20]  Saptashish Deb,et al.  Application of biofloc technology for Indian major carp culture (polyculture) along with water quality management , 2020 .

[21]  V. Shrivastava,et al.  Comparative study on the performance of genetically improved rohu “Jayanti” and native rohu, Labeo rohita fingerlings reared in biofloc system , 2020 .

[22]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  Hyperintensive stocking densities for Litopenaeus vannamei grow‐out in biofloc technology culture system , 2020 .

[23]  Aaron A. McNevin,et al.  Achieving sustainable aquaculture: Historical and current perspectives and future needs and challenges , 2020, Journal of the World Aquaculture Society.

[24]  N. Ha,et al.  Biofloc technology (BFT) improves skin pigmentation of goldfish (Carassius auratus) , 2020 .

[25]  P. A. Piana,et al.  PRODUCTION OF TILAPIA IN BIOFLOC WITH DIFFERENT SALT CONDICTIONS: AN EVALUATION OF BODY COMPOSITION AND ORGANOLEPTIC PROPERTIES , 2020 .

[26]  A. Saravanan,et al.  Comparative study on phenoloxidase activity of biofloc-reared pacific white shrimp Penaeus vannamei and Indian white shrimp Penaeus indicus on graded protein diet , 2020 .

[27]  M. Martínez‐Porchas,et al.  Effect of supplementing heterotrophic and photoautotrophic biofloc, on the production response, physiological condition and post-harvest quality of the whiteleg shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei , 2020 .

[28]  Guozhi Luo,et al.  Effects of carbohydrate supply strategies and biofloc concentrations on the growth performance of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) cultured in biofloc systems , 2020 .

[29]  Yanhong Liu,et al.  Monitoring of growth, digestive enzyme activity, immune response and water quality parameters of Golden crucian carp (Carassius auratus) in zero-water exchange tanks of biofloc systems , 2020 .

[30]  R. Akrami,et al.  Effects of different protein levels and carbon sources on water quality, antioxidant status and performance of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) juveniles raised in biofloc based system , 2020 .

[31]  P. Bossier,et al.  Water quality, animal performance, nutrient budgets and microbial community in the biofloc-based polyculture system of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei and gray mullet, Mugil cephalus , 2020 .

[32]  M. Sharifinia,et al.  Biofloc technology as a promising tool to improve aquaculture production , 2020 .

[33]  A. Saravanan,et al.  Bio-augmentation of heterotrophic bacteria in biofloc system improves growth, survival, and immunity of Indian white shrimp Penaeus indicus. , 2020, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[34]  O. Eroldoğan,et al.  Effects of Biofloc Technology (BFT) on Growth of Speckled Shrimp (Metapenaeus monoceros) , 2019, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi.

[35]  H. Adineh,et al.  Biofloc technology improves growth, innate immune responses, oxidative status, and resistance to acute stress in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) under high stocking density. , 2019, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[36]  M. Aalimahmoudi,et al.  Dietary protein level and carbon/nitrogen ratio manipulation in bioflocs rearing of Cyprinus carpio juvenile: Evaluation of growth performance, some blood biochemical and water parameters , 2019, Aquaculture.

[37]  G. Rathore,et al.  Carbon sources affect water quality and haemato‐biochemical responses ofLabeo rohitain zero‐water exchange biofloc system , 2019, Aquaculture Research.

[38]  M. Ikhwanuddin,et al.  Effect of different aeration units, nitrogen types and inoculum on biofloc formation for improvement of Pacific Whiteleg shrimp production , 2019, The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research.

[39]  O. Ozmen,et al.  Effect of biofloc technology on growth of speckled shrimp, Metapenaeus monoceros (Fabricus) in different feeding regimes , 2019, Aquaculture Research.

[40]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  Managing input C/N ratio to reduce the risk of Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease (AHPND) outbreaks in biofloc systems – A laboratory study , 2019, Aquaculture.

[41]  A. Gopalakannan,et al.  Effect of in-situ and ex-situ biofloc on immune response of Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia. , 2019, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[42]  Guozhi Luo,et al.  Using poly-β-hydroxybutyric as an additional carbohydrate for biofloc in a shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei bioflocs nursery system with brackish water , 2019, Aquaculture.

[43]  Dong Han,et al.  Biofloc formation improves water quality and fish yield in a freshwater pond aquaculture system , 2019, Aquaculture.

[44]  J. L. Arredondo-Figueroa,et al.  Response surface analysis of temperature-salinity interaction effects on water quality, growth and survival of shrimp Penaeus vannamei postlarvae raised in biofloc intensive nursery production , 2019, Aquaculture.

[45]  M. Martínez‐Porchas,et al.  Addition of commercial probiotic in a biofloc shrimp farm of Litopenaeus vannamei during the nursery phase: Effect on bacterial diversity using massive sequencing 16S rRNA , 2019, Aquaculture.

[46]  C. Saranya,et al.  Carbohydrate sources deferentially influence growth performances, microbial dynamics and immunomodulation in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) under biofloc system , 2019, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[47]  M. Emerenciano,et al.  Pizzeria by-product: A complementary feed source for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) raised in biofloc technology? , 2019, Aquaculture.

[48]  A. Gálvez,et al.  Nile tilapia fingerling cultivated in a low-salinity biofloc system at different stocking densities , 2019, Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research.

[49]  E. Lima,et al.  The culture of Nile tilapia at different salinities using a biofloc system , 2019, REVISTA CIÊNCIA AGRONÔMICA.

[50]  Mingming Zhang,et al.  Biofloc technology (BFT): An alternative aquaculture system for prevention of Cyprinid herpesvirus 2 infection in gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) , 2018, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[51]  M. Esteban,et al.  Beneficial roles of feed additives as immunostimulants in aquaculture: a review , 2018 .

[52]  A. Moing,et al.  Metabolomics and fish nutrition: a review in the context of sustainable feed development , 2018, Reviews in Aquaculture.

[53]  Shirley Thompson,et al.  Global Aquaculture Productivity, Environmental Sustainability, and Climate Change Adaptability , 2018, Environmental Management.

[54]  Zhangying Ye,et al.  Influence of stocking density on growth, digestive enzyme activities, immune responses, antioxidant of Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings in biofloc systems , 2018, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[55]  S. Otta,et al.  Carbon: Nitrogen (C:N) ratio level variation influences microbial community of the system and growth as well as immunity of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in biofloc based culture system , 2018, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[56]  N. Romano,et al.  Fermenting rice bran as a carbon source for biofloc technology improved the water quality, growth, feeding efficiencies, and biochemical composition of African catfish Clarias gariepinus juveniles , 2018, Aquaculture Research.

[57]  Andrew J. Ray,et al.  Comparing biofloc, clear-water, and hybrid recirculating nursery systems (Part II): Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) production and water quality dynamics , 2018 .

[58]  Alejandra Prieto-Davó,et al.  Immune response of the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei , previously reared in biofloc and after an infection assay with Vibrio harveyi , 2018, Journal of the World Aquaculture Society.

[59]  G. Wolfaardt,et al.  Economic risks due to declining water quality in the Breede River catchment , 2018, Water SA.

[60]  P. Liu,et al.  Effects of dietary biofloc on growth, digestibility, protein turnover and energy budget of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka) , 2018, Animal Feed Science and Technology.

[61]  P. Pandey,et al.  Biofloc improves water, effluent quality and growth parameters of Penaeus vannamei in an intensive culture system. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[62]  A. Assefa,et al.  Maintenance of Fish Health in Aquaculture: Review of Epidemiological Approaches for Prevention and Control of Infectious Disease of Fish , 2018, Veterinary medicine international.

[63]  Methawee Rodmongkoldee,et al.  Growth performances, survival rate, and biochemical parameters of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared in water treated with probiotic , 2018, Comparative Clinical Pathology.

[64]  M. Ebrahimi,et al.  Influence of carbon/nitrogen ratios on biofloc production and biochemical composition and subsequent effects on the growth, physiological status and disease resistance of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) cultured in glycerol-based biofloc systems , 2018 .

[65]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Biofloc technology application in indoor culture of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) fingerlings: The effects on inorganic nitrogen control, growth and immunity. , 2017, Chemosphere.

[66]  Z. Muchlisin,et al.  Growth performance and feed utilization of African catfish Clarias gariepinus fed a commercial diet and reared in the biofloc system enhanced with probiotic , 2017, F1000Research.

[67]  P. Bossier,et al.  Biofloc technology application in aquaculture to support sustainable development goals , 2017, Microbial biotechnology.

[68]  P. Anand,et al.  Dietary biofloc supplementation in black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon: effects on immunity, antioxidant and metabolic enzyme activities , 2017 .

[69]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  The effects of different feeding rates and re-feeding of Litopenaeus vannamei in a biofloc culture system , 2017 .

[70]  M. Esteban,et al.  Effects of carbon sources and plant protein levels in a biofloc system on growth performance, and the immune and antioxidant status of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) , 2017, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[71]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  Effect of different total suspended solids levels on a Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) BFT culture system during biofloc formation , 2017 .

[72]  P. Abreu,et al.  The use of different aerators on Litopenaeus vannamei biofloc culture system: effects on water quality, shrimp growth and biofloc composition , 2017, Aquaculture International.

[73]  Shao-an Liao,et al.  The effect of different carbon sources on the nutritional composition, microbial community and structure of bioflocs , 2016 .

[74]  N. Zhang,et al.  Growth, digestive enzyme activity and welfare of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared in a biofloc-based system with poly-β-hydroxybutyric as a carbon source , 2016 .

[75]  L. Pan,et al.  Effects of different carbon sources addition on nutrition composition and extracellular enzymes activity of bioflocs, and digestive enzymes activity and growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in zero-exchange culture tanks , 2016 .

[76]  Sanjoy Banerjee,et al.  Biofloc as a potential natural feed for shrimp postlarvae , 2016 .

[77]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  Effect of different total suspended solids concentrations on the growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in a BFT system , 2016 .

[78]  F. B. Lakani,et al.  Effects of biofloc on growth performance, digestive enzyme activities and liver histology of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) fingerlings in zero-water exchange system , 2016, Fish Physiology and Biochemistry.

[79]  T. Samocha,et al.  Effects of C/N ratio on biofloc development, water quality, and performance of Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles in a biofloc-based, high-density, zero-exchange, outdoor tank system , 2016 .

[80]  M. Hernández‐Vergara,et al.  C:N ratios affect nitrogen removal and production of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus raised in a biofloc system under high density cultivation , 2016 .

[81]  S. Pereira,et al.  Microbial biofloc as source of probiotic bacteria for the culture of Litopenaeus vannamei , 2015 .

[82]  E. Ali,et al.  Growth Performance of the Green Tiger Shrimp Penaeus semisulcatus Raised in Biofloc Systems , 2015 .

[83]  Deguang Yu,et al.  Effect of C/N ratio on water quality in zero-water exchange tanks and the biofloc supplementation in feed on the growth performance of crucian carp, Carassius auratus , 2015 .

[84]  S. Seixas,et al.  Innovation and educational changes: two e-Learning cases in aquaculture , 2015, Aquaculture International.

[85]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  Effect of temperature on nursery and compensatory growth of pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis reared in a super-intensive biofloc system , 2015 .

[86]  P. Bossier,et al.  Biofloc technology positively affects Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) larvae performance , 2015 .

[87]  Aaron A. McNevin,et al.  Aquaculture, Resource Use, and the Environment: Boyd/Aquaculture , 2015 .

[88]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  Effects of nitrate toxicity in the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, reared with biofloc technology (BFT) , 2015, Aquaculture International.

[89]  P. Bossier,et al.  Immune response and disease resistance of shrimp fed biofloc grown on different carbon sources. , 2014, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[90]  Guozhi Luo,et al.  Efficiency of biofloc technology in suspended growth reactors treating aquacultural solid under intermittent aeration , 2014 .

[91]  Guozhi Luo,et al.  Growth, digestive activity, welfare, and partial cost-effectiveness of genetically improved farmed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cultured in a recirculating aquaculture system and an indoor biofloc system , 2014 .

[92]  J. Papenbrock,et al.  Sustainable Treatment of Aquaculture Effluents—What Can We Learn from the Past for the Future? , 2014 .

[93]  T. Samocha,et al.  The Reuse of Water on the Culture of Pacific White Shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, in BFT System , 2014 .

[94]  J. Monserrat,et al.  Effect of temperature on antioxidant enzymatic activity in the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in a BFT (Biofloc technology) system , 2014 .

[95]  L. Pan,et al.  Enhancement of immune response and antioxidant status of Litopenaeus vannamei juvenile in biofloc-based culture tanks manipulating high C/N ratio of feed input , 2013 .

[96]  G. Gaxiola,et al.  Effect of short-term fresh food supplementation on reproductive performance, biochemical composition, and fatty acid profile of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) reared under biofloc conditions , 2013, Aquaculture International.

[97]  C. E. Santo,et al.  Effect of different biofloc levels on microbial activity, water quality and performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in a tank system operated with no water exchange , 2013 .

[98]  L. Burridge,et al.  The Canadian Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture Network (CIMTAN)—A Network for a New Era of Ecosystem Responsible Aquaculture , 2013 .

[99]  S. D. Roy,et al.  Effect of dietary supplementation of biofloc on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities in Penaeus monodon , 2013 .

[100]  P. S. Rao,et al.  Water Quality and Growth of Rohu, Labeo rohita, in a Biofloc System , 2013 .

[101]  John Bostock,et al.  Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS) analysis: Main issues on management and future challenges , 2012 .

[102]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Biofloc technology in aquaculture: Beneficial effects and future challenges , 2012 .

[103]  Fengliang Zhao,et al.  Nutrient removal efficiency and biomass production of different bioenergy plants in hypereutrophic water. , 2012 .

[104]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  Biofloc technology application as a food source in a limited water exchange nursery system for pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817) , 2012 .

[105]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  Superintensive Culture of White Shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, in a Biofloc Technology System in Southern Brazil at Different Stocking Densities , 2011 .

[106]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  Nursery of Pink Shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis in Biofloc Technology Culture System: Survival and Growth at Different Stocking Densities , 2011 .

[107]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  The Effect of Solids Removal on Water Quality, Growth and Survival of Litopenaeus vannamei in a Biofloc Technology Culture System , 2011 .

[108]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  Effect of biofloc technology (BFT) on the early postlarval stage of pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis: growth performance, floc composition and salinity stress tolerance , 2011, Aquaculture International.

[109]  M. Verdegem,et al.  New developments in recirculating aquaculture systems in Europe: A perspective on environmental sustainability , 2010 .

[110]  Y. Moret,et al.  Dietary Supplementation with Carotenoids Improves Immunity without Increasing Its Cost in a Crustacean , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[111]  L. Marsh,et al.  Evaluation of two types of bioflocs derived from biological treatment of fish effluent as feed ingredients for Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei , 2010 .

[112]  W. Verstraete,et al.  The effect of different carbon sources on the nutritional value of bioflocs, a feed for Macrobrachium rosenbergii postlarvae , 2010 .

[113]  D. Little,et al.  The biofloc technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: Water quality, biofloc composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) , 2008 .

[114]  W. Verstraete,et al.  The basics of bio-flocs technology: The added value for aquaculture , 2008 .

[115]  D. Little,et al.  Microbial protein production in activated suspension tanks manipulating C:N ratio in feed and the implications for fish culture. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[116]  Zonghui Yuan,et al.  Environmental impact of aquaculture and countermeasures to aquaculture pollution in China , 2007, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[117]  M. T. Gutierrez-Wing,et al.  Biological filters in aquaculture: Trends and research directions for freshwater and marine applications , 2006 .

[118]  J. Hargreaves Photosynthetic suspended-growth systems in aquaculture , 2006 .

[119]  E. Eding,et al.  Analysis of nutrient flows in integrated intensive aquaculture systems , 2005 .

[120]  Zhiguo Yuan,et al.  Short-term effects of carbon source on the competition of polyphosphate accumulating organisms and glycogen accumulating organisms. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[121]  C. Webster,et al.  Nutrient Requirements and Feeding of Finfish for Aquaculture , 2002 .

[122]  H. Mooney,et al.  Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies , 2000, Nature.

[123]  J. C. Goldman,et al.  Regulation of gross growth efficiency and ammonium regeneration in bacteria by substrate C: N ratio1 , 1987 .

[124]  A. Akbarzadeh,et al.  Effects of restricted feeding levels and stocking densities on water quality, growth performance, body composition and mucosal innate immunity of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry in a biofloc system , 2022 .

[125]  M. Muralidhar,et al.  Co-culture of Indian white shrimp, Penaeus indicus and seaweed, Gracilaria tenuistipitata in amended biofloc and recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) , 2022, Aquaculture.

[126]  M. Emerenciano,et al.  Organoleptic and nutritional characteristics of fillets of pirapitinga fed different protein sources in a biofloc system , 2020 .

[127]  P. Abreu,et al.  Effect of aeration intensity on the biofilm nitrification process during the production of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in Biofloc and clear water systems , 2020 .

[128]  M. Dawood Nutritional immunity of fish intestines: important insights for sustainable aquaculture , 2020 .

[129]  Min Deng,et al.  The effect of different carbon sources on water quality, microbial community and structure of biofloc systems , 2018 .

[130]  E. H. Najdegerami,et al.  Growth performance, haematology, antioxidant status, immune response and histology of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) fed biofloc grown on different carbon sources , 2018 .

[131]  K. Andree,et al.  A comparison of recirculation aquaculture systems versus biofloc technology culture system for on-growing of fry of Tinca tinca (Cyprinidae) and fry of grey Mugil cephalus (Mugilidae) , 2018 .

[132]  E. Kamrani,et al.  Ecological risk assessment of trace metals in the surface sediments of the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman: Evidence from subtropical estuaries of the Iranian coastal waters. , 2018, Chemosphere.

[133]  W. Wasielesky,et al.  Use of molasses as a carbon source during the nursery rearing of Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817) in a Biofloc technology system , 2014 .