Mind the Gap: The Growing Distance between Institutional and Technical Capabilities in Organizations Performing Critical Operations

Although there are many reasons to seek to augment the capacity of crisis management and response organizations with various forms of information technology (IT), it is not clear that they will be able to adapt organizationally or institutionally to make effective use of the new capabilities. The behavior of organizations responsible for large, complex and tightly coupled systems is already known to be very difficult to predict reliably, due to their complexity, coupling, and nonlinear interactions. Historically, they are subject to a range of pathologies that are difficult to predict, ranging from self-organizing disasters to rigid and insensitive response. IT intensive organizations add to this the potential for unprecedented incoherence of tasks and task monitoring, leading to possible displacement of the locus of administration or the dissipation of task responsibility in ways that are still poorly understood, and badly in need of further intensive study.

[1]  M. Landau,et al.  To Manage Is Not To Control: Or the Folly of Type II Errors , 1979 .

[2]  Nordal Akerman The Necessity Of Friction , 1998 .

[3]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[4]  Gene I. Rochlin,et al.  Essential friction: error-control in organizational behavior , 1993 .

[5]  Scott D. Sagan The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons , 1993 .

[6]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[7]  M. Mitchell Waldrop,et al.  Complexity : the emerging science and the edge of order and chaos , 1992 .

[8]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[9]  Jessica Stern,et al.  The Ultimate Terrorists , 1999 .

[10]  K. Weick The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[11]  Joel Novek,et al.  It, Gender, and Professional Practice: Or, Why an Automated Drug Distribution System Was Sent Back to the Manufacturer , 2002 .

[12]  Ulrich J. Franke Managing Virtual Web Organizations in the 21st Century: Issues and Challenges , 2002 .

[13]  Michio Kondoh,et al.  Foraging Adaptation and the Relationship Between Food-Web Complexity and Stability , 2003, Science.

[14]  Diane Vaughan,et al.  The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA , 1996 .

[15]  L. Comfort,et al.  Managing Crises: Threats, Dilemmas, Opportunities , 2001 .

[16]  Marlys K. Christianson,et al.  Managing the unexpected , 2001 .

[17]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[18]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[19]  Charles Perrow,et al.  Organizing to Reduce the Vulnerabilities of Complexity , 1999 .

[20]  T. Sanders Strategic Thinking and the New Science: Planning in the Midst of Chaos Complexity and Change , 1998 .

[21]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .