Relationship between behavioral marital therapy outcome and process variables.

This study was conducted to identify therapist and client behaviors associated with a positive response to social learning-based behavioral marital therapy. A sample of 32 couples receiving treatment was examined. Immediately after each therapy session, the therapist, husband, and wife independently completed process rating forms that measured therapist and client behaviors during the session. Composite scales, derived from these ratings, were entered into multiple regression equations to examine their relationship with posttherapy marital satisfaction. After controlling for pretherapy marital satisfaction and the other predictor variables, therapists', husbands', and wives' ratings of positive client behavior (i.e., collaboration, active participation, and homework compliance) were positively associated with therapy outcome. Implications for marital therapy and suggestions for future research are discussed.

[1]  H. Markman,et al.  Effectiveness of behavioral marital therapy: empirical status of behavioral techniques in preventing and alleviating marital distress. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  G. Silberschatz,et al.  Vanderbilt Psychotherapy Process Scale: a replication with adult outpatients. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[3]  W. Stiles PSYCHOTHERAPY PROCESS-OUTCOME CORRELATIONS MAY BE MISLEADING , 1988 .

[4]  Windy Dryden,et al.  Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change , 1987, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[5]  M. Pagel,et al.  Predicting who will benefit from behavioral marital therapy. , 1986, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[6]  L Coyne,et al.  Therapeutic alliance: its place as a process and outcome variable in dynamic psychotherapy research. , 1986, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[7]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Variability in outcome and clinical significance of behavioral marital therapy: a reanalysis of outcome data. , 1984, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[8]  H. Strupp,et al.  The Vanderbilt Psychotherapy Process Scale: a report on the scale development and a process-outcome study. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[9]  B Gomes-Schwartz,et al.  Effective ingredients in psychotherapy: prediction of outcome from process variables. , 1978, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[10]  G. Spanier Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads , 1976 .