Correcting erroneous inferences in memory: The role of source credibility

Abstract People often continue to rely on erroneous information about people and events, even in the face of subsequent counter information. The current study examined whether this information could be effectively corrected by a credible source. We examined two aspects of credibility: trustworthiness and expertise. Experiment 1 showed that receiving a correction from a source high in trustworthiness and expertise reduced participants’ use of original information when making inferences. Experiment 2 showed that source expertise alone was not sufficient to reduce participants’ reliance on the original information. The results from Experiment 3 showed that source trustworthiness alone significantly decreased participants’ use of the original information when making inferences. The results suggest that people may be able to reduce their use of original information if they receive a correction from a person who is deemed to be highly trustworthy. These findings have implications for decision making in politics and other applied areas.

[1]  L. Geraci,et al.  The persistence of inferences in memory for younger and older adults: Remembering facts and believing inferences , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Hollyn M. Johnson,et al.  Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. , 1994 .

[3]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation , 2005, Psychological science.

[4]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Kim L. Fridkin,et al.  Do Negative Messages Work? , 2004 .

[6]  H. H. Johnson,et al.  Relationship between authoritarianism and attitude change as a function of source credibility and type of communication. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Phoebe C. Ellsworth,et al.  The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise. , 1987 .

[8]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Correcting false information in memory: Manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  C. D. Ward,et al.  Better Liked than Right , 1980 .

[10]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Misinformation and Its Correction , 2012, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[11]  L. Ross,et al.  Perseverance of Social Theories: The Role of Explanation in the Persistence of Discredited Information , 1980 .

[12]  Misinformation and the "War on Terror": when memory turns fiction into fact , 2008 .

[13]  Terrorism and torture: An interdisciplinary perspective , 2009 .

[14]  J. Mowen,et al.  SOURCE CREDIBILITY: ON THE INDEPENDENT EFFECTS OF TRUST AND EXPERTISE , 1986 .

[15]  A. L. Wilkes,et al.  On Certain Limitations Accompanying Readers’ Interpretations of Corrections in Episodic Text , 1999 .

[16]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Terrorists brought down the plane!—No, actually it was a technical fault: Processing corrections of emotive information , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  A. Lupia Thinking about Political Psychology: Who Can Persuade Whom? Implications from the Nexus of Psychology and Rational Choice Theory , 2002 .

[18]  Rebecca C. Knickmeyer,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer Fetal testosterone and autistic traits , 2014 .

[19]  Kim L. Fridkin,et al.  The Dimensions of Negative Messages , 2008 .

[20]  F. Godlee,et al.  Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  L. Ross,et al.  Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty. , 1980 .

[23]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness , 1951 .

[24]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Reinstatement of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[25]  William Allen,et al.  The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness , 1953 .

[26]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[27]  A. Wilkes,et al.  Editing Episodic Memory following the Identification of Error , 1988 .

[28]  Jesse R. Sparks,et al.  Readers' reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. , 1996 .

[30]  E. Loftus,et al.  Treat and trick: A new way to increase false memory , 2010 .

[31]  Chanthika Pornpitakpan The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence , 2004 .