A Framework for Design Rationale Retrieval

Design documents contain various types of knowledge and these are useful resources for knowledge reuse. The increasing interest in capturing and reusing such documents is evident as employees in knowledge-intensive areas tend to rely on experience. For example, the majority of engineering designs are related to the modifications of previous proven designs in order to accommodate new requirements. Knowledge reuse depends on the successful retrieval of the required knowledge. It has been difficult to develop efficient retrieval methods especially for the documents created by individuals. When people create documents, they might not consider how the documents can be reused or what information should be accessed. This paper presents a semantic-based retrieval method that understands, organizes and extracts information from documents in a way that mimics human thought (e.g. what are the causes of overheating?). One advantage of this method is that information seekers do not need to worry about selecting right query terms.

[1]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Derivation and Use of Design Rationale Information as Expressed by Designers , 2007 .

[2]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  From Discourse Analysis to Answering Design Questions , 2004, LSTKM@EKAW.

[3]  John Domingue,et al.  Augmenting design deliberation with Compendium: the case of collaborative ontology design , 2002 .

[4]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  DRed and Design Folders: A Way of Capturing, Storing and Passing On Knowledge Generated During Design Projects , 2004, DAC 2004.

[5]  Kuntz Werner,et al.  Issues as Elements of Information Systems , 1970 .

[6]  Ralph Grishman,et al.  A Corpus-based Probabilistic Grammar with Only Two Non-terminals , 1995, IWPT.

[7]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .

[8]  William C. Regli,et al.  A Survey of Design Rationale Systems: Approaches, Representation, Capture and Retrieval , 2000, Engineering with Computers.

[9]  Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza,et al.  ADD+: Including rhetorical structures in active documents , 1997, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[10]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Okapi at TREC-3 , 1994, TREC.

[11]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  GatfordCentre for Interactive Systems ResearchDepartment of Information , 1996 .

[12]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  A TOOL FOR CAPTURING DESIGN RATIONALE , 2003 .

[13]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Statistical semantics: analysis of the potential performance of keyword information systems , 1984 .

[14]  S. T. Dumais,et al.  Human factors and behavioral science: Statistical semantics: Analysis of the potential performance of key-word information systems , 1983, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[15]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  Fishing for Exactness , 1996, ArXiv.

[16]  Gerald Salton,et al.  Automatic text processing , 1988 .