Airlines Performance via Two-Stage Network DEA Approach

The performance of the airline industry has been widely studied using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Many existing DEA-based airline performance studies have used the standard DEA model, with some minor modifications. These studies have ignored the internal structure relative to the measures characterizing airline operations performance. In the current paper, airline performance is measured using a two-stage process. In the first stage, resources (fuel, salaries, and other factors) are used to maintain the fleet size and load factor. In the second stage, the fleet size and load factors generate revenue. The model used is called the centralized efficiency model where two stages are used to optimize performance simultaneously. The approach generates efficiency decomposition for the two individual stages. The use of this centralized DEA model enables obtaining insights not available from the standard DEA approach.

[1]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  B. Bowen,et al.  AIRLINE QUALITY RATING , 1991 .

[3]  M. Schefczyk Operational performance of airlines: An extension of traditional measurement paradigms , 1993 .

[4]  David Gillen,et al.  DEVELOPING MEASURES OF AIRPORT PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE: AN APPLICATION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[5]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[6]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  R. Sickles,et al.  The Relationship Between Stock Market Returns and Technical Efficiency Innovations: Evidence from the US Airline Industry , 1998 .

[8]  Robin C. Sickles,et al.  Airline efficiency differences between Europe and the US: Implications for the pace of EC integration and domestic regulation , 1995 .

[9]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .

[10]  Carl A. Scheraga,et al.  Operational efficiency versus financial mobility in the global airline industry: a data envelopment and Tobit analysis , 2004 .

[11]  Chris Tofallis,et al.  Input efficiency profiling: An application to airlines , 1997, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition , 2008 .

[13]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[15]  Jose L. Tongzon,et al.  Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[16]  Boon L. Lee,et al.  The Relative Efficiency of International, Domestic, and Budget Airlines: Nonparametric Evidence , 2010 .