Influence of Small Impoundments on Habitat and Fish Communities in Headwater Streams

Abstract We surveyed the habitat and fish assemblages of four impounded and three unimpounded neighboring headwater streams, separated longitudinally into multiple upstream and downstream reaches. Instream habitat characteristics were similar between reaches of unimpounded streams and reaches above impoundments, and differed significantly from reaches below impoundments that included deeper water and more stable flows. Species richness was similar above and below impoundments, and between impounded and unimpounded streams, but fish assemblage composition and structure differed. Stream reaches above impoundments supported higher percentages of centrarchids compared to upper reaches of unimpounded streams, which had more obligate stream cyprinids. Reaches below impoundments supported mainly centrarchid species whereas lower reaches of unimpounded streams supported a balanced mix of cyprinids and centrarchids. Percina maculata (Blackside Darter) occurred throughout the study area except in upper reaches of impounded streams, illustrating how stream fragmentation can lead to localized extirpations. Changes to the fish assemblages in reaches above impoundments were due to the loss of downstream connectivity, and changes to the fish assemblages below impoundments were due to alterations of instream habitat caused by the impoundments. Small impoundments can have important effects on fish faunas of small geographical areas, but also potentially large cumulative effects if distribution of impoundments is not administered strategically at the scale of the river basin. We caution that continual population increase, recent droughts, and projected changes in climate patterns are prompting a renewed interest in impoundment construction, and urge close regulatory oversight over such projects.

[1]  J. Schmidt,et al.  The rate and pattern of bed incision and bank adjustment on the Colorado River in Glen Canyon downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, 1956–2000 , 2007 .

[2]  A. Spacie,et al.  Changes in Fish Assemblage Structure Upstream of Impoundments within the Upper Wabash River Basin, Indiana , 2006 .

[3]  A. Nicieza,et al.  Fish community variation along physical gradients in short streams of northern Spain and the disruptive effect of dams , 1996, Hydrobiologia.

[4]  I. Schlosser Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dynamics in headwater streams , 1995, Hydrobiologia.

[5]  A. J. Stewart,et al.  Fish size and habitat depth relationships in headwater streams , 1991, Oecologia.

[6]  M. Herbert,et al.  Spatial Variation of Headwater Fish Assemblages Explained by Hydrologic Variability and Upstream Effects of Impoundment , 2003, Copeia.

[7]  Ellen J. Sutherland Water supply reservoirs in Georgia: an update on Henry County’s proposed Tussahaw Creek Reservoir and the importance of thorough environmental impacts analyses , 2003 .

[8]  R. Sidle,et al.  Understanding Processes and Downstream Linkages of Headwater Systems , 2002 .

[9]  S. Ross Inland Fishes of Mississippi , 2002 .

[10]  Christopher A. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of stream impoundment on fish communities in a small north American drainage , 2001 .

[11]  M. Whiles,et al.  Influence of Instream and Landscape-Level Factors on the Distribution of Topeka Shiners Notropis topeka in Kansas Streams , 2001, Copeia.

[12]  W. Fisher,et al.  Declining Status of Two Species of the Macrhybopsis aestivalis Complex (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in the Arkansas River Basin and Related Effects of Reservoirs as Barriers to Dispersal , 1999 .

[13]  D. Lonzarich,et al.  Effects of habitat isolation on the recovery of fish assemblages in experimentally defaunated stream pools in Arkansas , 1998 .

[14]  M. Pyron,et al.  FISH ASSEMBLAGE STRUCTURE FROM 20 YEARS OF COLLECTIONS IN THE KIAMICHI RIVER, OKLAHOMA , 1998 .

[15]  L. Miranda Development of reservoir fisheries management paradigms in the twentieth century , 1996 .

[16]  Luther P. Aadland,et al.  Stream Habitat Types: Their Fish Assemblages and Relationship to Flow , 1993 .

[17]  J. Peterson,et al.  Colonization Rates of Fishes in Experimentally Defaunated Warmwater Streams , 1993 .

[18]  M. Winston,et al.  Upstream Extirpation of Four Minnow Species Due to Damming of a Prairie Stream , 1991 .

[19]  T. Berra,et al.  Temporal characteristics of fish assemblage structure in an Ohio stream , 1988 .

[20]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  Persistence of Stream Fish Assemblages: Effects of Environmental Change , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[21]  P. Moyle,et al.  Persistence and Structure of the Fish Assemblage in a Small California Stream , 1985 .

[22]  Geoffrey E. Petts,et al.  Impounded Rivers: Perspectives for Ecological Management , 1984 .

[23]  M. Wiley,et al.  The Relative Efficiencies of Electrofishing vs. Seines in Piedmont Streams of Maryland , 1983 .

[24]  W. Swink,et al.  Influence of a Kentucky Flood-Control Reservoir on the Tailwater and Headwater Fish Populations , 1983 .

[25]  I. Schlosser,et al.  FISH COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION ALONG TWO HABITAT GRADIENTS IN A HEADWATER STREAM , 1982 .

[26]  James R. Karr,et al.  Habitat Structure and Stream Fish Communities , 1978 .

[27]  R. Horwitz Temporal Variability Patterns and the Distributional Patterns of Stream Fishes , 1978 .

[28]  R. Edwards The Effect of Hypolimnion Reservoir Releases on Fish Distribution and Species Diversity , 1978 .

[29]  D. C. Erman Upstream Changes in Fish Populations following Impoundment of Sagehen Creek, California , 1973 .

[30]  M. Gordon Wolman,et al.  Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology , 1965 .

[31]  C. Heckrotte,et al.  Destruction and Re-establishment of Stream Fish and Invertebrates Affected by Drought , 1959 .