Fukushima and thereafter: Reassessment of risks of nuclear power

The Fukushima nuclear accident on March 11, 2011 in Japan has severely dented the prospects of growth of civilian nuclear power in many countries. Although Japan's worst nuclear accident was triggered by an unprecedented earthquake and tsunami, inadequate safety countermeasures and collusive ties between the plant operators, regulators, and government officials left the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant beyond redemption. A critical examination of the accident reveals that the accumulation of various technical and institutional lapses only compounded the nuclear disaster. Besides technical fixes such as enhanced engineering safety features and better siting choices, the critical ingredient for safe operation of nuclear reactors lie in the quality of human training and transparency of the nuclear regulatory process that keeps public interest—not utility interest—at the forefront. The need for a credible and transparent analysis of the social benefits and risks of nuclear power is emphasized in the context of energy portfolio choice.

[1]  B. R. Judd,et al.  Economic and social costs of coal and nuclear electric generation, a framework for assessment and illustrative calculations for the coal and nuclear fuel cycles. Discussion paper , 1976 .

[2]  Daphne Ngar-yin Mah,et al.  The role of the state in sustainable energy transitions: A case study of large smart grid demonstration projects in Japan , 2013 .

[3]  Alvin M. Weinberg.  A nuclear power advocate reflects on Chernobyl , 1986 .

[4]  Palmer Cosslett Putnam,et al.  Energy In The Future , 1955 .

[5]  T. G. Rethinaraj.  In the comfort of secrecy , 1999 .

[6]  Chuanwang Sun,et al.  Chinese Public Willingness to Pay to Avoid Having Nuclear Power Plants in the Neighborhood , 2014 .

[7]  Hisashi Aoki,et al.  Geological storage of nuclear wastes: Insights following the Fukushima crisis , 2014 .

[8]  K. Mossman.  Permissible Dose: A History of Radiation Protection in the Twentieth Century, , 2001 .

[9]  Jacob Darwin Hamblin,et al.  Permissible Dose: A History of Radiation Protection in the Twentieth Century , 2000 .

[10]  H. Kanamori.  The energy release in great earthquakes , 1977 .

[11]  Chuanwang Sun,et al.  Evaluating the public perceptions of nuclear power in China: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey , 2014 .

[12]  Tomás Mancha-Navarro,et al.  Application of the counterfactual method to assess of the local economic impact of a nuclear power station , 2013 .

[13]  Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters.  Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety : the Accident at TEPCO's Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations , 2011 .

[14]  Lucille Langlois,et al.  IAEA Action Plan on nuclear safety , 2013 .

[15]  James A. Edmonds,et al.  The Challenges and Potential of Nuclear Energy for Addressing Climate Change , 2007 .

[16]  Norman C. Rasmussen,et al.  METHODS OF HAZARD ANALYSIS AND NUCLEAR SAFETY ENGINEERING , 1981 .

[17]  Robert J. Geller,et al.  Fukushima: The myth of safety, the reality of geoscience , 2011 .

[18]  E. Strickland,et al.  24 hours at Fukushima , 2011, IEEE Spectrum.

[19]  Samuel Glasstone,et al.  The Effects of Nuclear Weapons , 1952 .

[20]  Zeynep Erdeniz.  International Herald Tribune , 2007 .

[21]  E. Rubin.  Introduction to Engineering and the Environment , 2000 .

[22]  G. Brumfiel,et al.  Japan's nuclear crisis: Fukushima's legacy of fear , 2012, Nature.

[23]  東京電力福島原子力発電所事故調査委員会.  The official report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission : executive summary , 2012 .

[24]  John C. Lee,et al.  Risk and Safety Analysis of Nuclear Systems , 2011 .