Learning Across Communities of Practice: An Examination of Multidisciplinary Work

Communities of practice (CoPs) have been identified as important sites of learning. Novices learn from masters whilst participating in situated practice and becoming more central members of the community. Empirical studies highlight the difficulty of learning across CoPs, although few studies specifically examine how learning develops in such a multidisciplinary context. We examine the processes of learning occurring when members of different CoPs, in this case various cancer specialists, are required to meet together as a formally constituted multidisciplinary team, and to establish multidisciplinary collaboration as a basis for decision making and action. Our paper highlights that while learning in CoPs develops through repetition, gaining legitimacy and achieving mastery, learning across CoPs in multidisciplinary contexts emphasizes key boundary processes to negotiate and broaden meaning. As such, multidisciplinary collaboration is not so much to learn from each others' talk, but to learn to talk in this new arena. We identify three practices which facilitate learning across CoPs: organizing discussions, acknowledging other perspectives and challenging assumptions. We also discuss the boundary processes which are promoted through brokers and the use of boundary objects in facilitating multidisciplinary work.

[1]  Elisa Mattarelli,et al.  The role of networks of practice, value sharing, and operational proximity in knowledge flows between professional groups , 2006 .

[2]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[3]  D. Schoen The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[4]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[5]  S. Newell,et al.  Project-Based Learning and the Role of Learning Boundaries , 2004 .

[6]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[7]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[8]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Conflicting epistemic cultures and obstacles for learning across communities of practice , 2008 .

[9]  Karen Locke,et al.  Composing Qualitative Research , 1997 .

[10]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Landscape of Qualitative Research , 2012 .

[11]  D. Yanow Translating Local Knowledge at Organizational Peripheries , 2004 .

[12]  E. Ferlie,et al.  Networks, Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: NHS Cancer Networks , 2006 .

[13]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Moritz Schlick,et al.  Knowing and Being , 1974 .

[15]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy , 2005 .

[16]  Glenn Robert,et al.  Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: lessons for modernizing the National Health Service in England and Wales , 2002 .

[17]  E. Ferlie,et al.  The Nonspread of Innovations: the Mediating Role of Professionals , 2005 .

[18]  Jennifer Robertson,et al.  Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace , 1990 .

[19]  Paul Bate,et al.  Changing the Culture of a Hospital: From Hierarchy to NetworkedCommunity , 2000 .

[20]  A. Edmondson Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams , 2003 .

[21]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[22]  M. Neale,et al.  What Differences Make a Difference? , 2005, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[23]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification , 2005 .

[24]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[25]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[26]  G. Currie,et al.  The Impact of Institutional Forces Upon Knowledge Sharing in the UK NHS: The Triumph of Professional Power and the Inconsistency of Policy , 2006 .

[27]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Learning In a Constellation of Interconnected Practices: Canon or Dissonance? , 2002 .

[28]  Mark Thompson,et al.  Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of Practice , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[29]  E. Freidson Claims Examined. (Book Reviews: Profession of Medicine. A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge) , 1970 .

[30]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[31]  Loizos Heracleous,et al.  Organizational Change as Discourse: Communicative Actions and Deep Structures in the Context of Information Technology Implementation , 2001 .

[32]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[33]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[34]  Beth A. Bechky Talking About Machines, Thick Description, and Knowledge Work , 2006 .

[35]  John Gabbay,et al.  A Case Study of Knowledge Management in Multiagency Consumer-Informed `Communities of Practice': Implications for Evidence-Based Policy Development in Health and Social Services , 2003 .

[36]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[37]  R CarlilePaul A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries , 2002 .

[38]  Alice F. Freed Communities of practice and pregnant women: Is there a connection? , 1999, Language in Society.

[39]  A. Amin,et al.  Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice , 2008 .

[40]  Victoria Hoban,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner , 2013 .

[41]  J. Lathlean,et al.  Communities of practice: an opportunity for interagency working. , 2002, Journal of clinical nursing.

[42]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual , 2002 .

[43]  Frank Blackler,et al.  Power, mastery and organizational learning. , 2000 .