Welcoming different perspectives in IPBES: “Nature’s contributions to people” and “Ecosystem services”

INTRODUCTION A recent paper by Díaz et al. (2018a) presented “nature’s contributions to people,” a conceptual framework developed within the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). The authors wrote that it could nurture a paradigm shift from the concept of ecosystem services. The paper has sparked quick reactions including a critical editorial response in the journal Ecosystem Services (Braat 2018) and several Science eLetters responses. Díaz et al. (2018a) and the responses generally disagree on whether the paradigm shift suggested by the original contribution is justified and whether the nature’s contributions to people framework represents a scientific advance that is broadly useful in contexts other than IPBES.

[1]  L. Braat Five reasons why the Science publication “Assessing nature’s contributions to people” (Diaz et al. 2018) would not have been accepted in Ecosystem Services , 2018 .

[2]  S. Polasky,et al.  Assessing nature's contributions to people , 2018, Science.

[3]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems , 2017 .

[4]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Multiscale scenarios for nature futures , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[5]  Brian E. Robinson,et al.  When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services: Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models , 2017 .

[6]  Unai Pascual,et al.  Urgent need to strengthen the international commitment to IPBES , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[7]  Carl Folke,et al.  Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability , 2017 .

[8]  R. Lidskog,et al.  Bumping against the boundary: IPBES and the knowledge divide , 2017 .

[9]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions , 2016 .

[10]  Yang Bai,et al.  New ecological redline policy (ERP) to secure ecosystem services in China , 2016 .

[11]  Salman Qureshi,et al.  Advancing Urban Ecology toward a Science of Cities , 2016 .

[12]  Wu Yang,et al.  Framing ecosystem services in the telecoupled Anthropocene , 2016 .

[13]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Thomas F. Thornton,et al.  Ecosystem services or services to ecosystems? Valuing cultivation and reciprocal relationships between humans and ecosystems , 2015 .

[15]  M. Feldman,et al.  Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability , 2015 .

[17]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social–ecological systems perspective , 2015 .

[18]  Stanley T. Asah,et al.  The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people , 2015 .

[19]  Juan C. Rocha,et al.  Regime Shifts in the Anthropocene: Drivers, Risks, and Resilience , 2015, bioRxiv.

[20]  T. McPhearson,et al.  Advancing the frontier of urban ecosystem services research , 2015 .

[21]  S. Moser,et al.  The long arm of climate change: societal teleconnections and the future of climate change impacts studies , 2015, Climatic Change.

[22]  W. Steffen,et al.  The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration , 2015 .

[23]  J. Aronson,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: requirements, approaches, and impacts , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  Maria Tengö,et al.  Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach , 2014, AMBIO.

[25]  I. Otto,et al.  Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change , 2013 .

[26]  Mary E. Kentula,et al.  Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice , 2012 .

[27]  K. Chan,et al.  Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values , 2012 .

[28]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[29]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world , 2008 .

[31]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  E. Bennett Research Frontiers in Ecosystem Service Science , 2016, Ecosystems.