Population dynamics of human language : a complex system

In the course of natural history, Evolution has come up with several great innovations, such as nucleic acids, proteins, cells, chromosomes, multi-cellular organisms, the nervous system.... The last “invention” which truly revolutionized the very rules of evolution is language. It gives us an unprecedented possibility to transmit information from generation to generation not by the “traditional” means of a genetic code, but by talking. This new mode of cross-generational information transfer has given rise to the so-called “cultural evolution”. It is responsible for a big part of being “human”. It is shaping the history and changing the rules of biology. Without exaggeration, it is one of the most fascinating traits of Homo Sapiens. The study of language and grammar dates back to classical India and Greece. In the 18th century, the “discovery” of Indo-European led to the surprising realization that very different languages can be related to each other, which initiated the field of historical linguistics. Formal language theory emerged only in the 20th century (Chomsky, 1956, 1957; Harrison, 1978): the main goals are to describe the rules that a speaker uses to generate linguistic forms (descriptive adequacy) and to explain how language competence emerges in the human brain (explanatory adequacy). These efforts were supported by advances in the mathematical and computational analysis of the process of language acquisition, a field that became known as learning theory. Currently there are increasing attempts to bring linguistic inquiry in contact with various disciplines of biology, including neurobiology (Deacon, 1997; Vargha-Khadem et al., 1998), animal behavior (Dunbar, 1996; Hauser, 1996; Fitch, 2000), evolution (Lieberman, 1984; Pinker and Bloom, 1990; Bickerton, 1990; Lieberman, 1991; Hawkins and Gell-Mann, 1992; Batali, 1994; Maynard Smith and Szathmary, 1995; Aitchinson, 1996; Hurford et al., 1998;

[1]  M. Gopnik,et al.  Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder , 1991, Cognition.

[2]  M A Nowak,et al.  Natural selection of the critical period for language acquisition , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Complex adaptive systems: Exploring the known, the unknown and the unknowable , 2002 .

[4]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[5]  M A Nowak,et al.  The evolutionary dynamics of the lexical matrix , 2001, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Neural basis of an inherited speech and language disorder. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  David G. Hays,et al.  Uniquely human: The evolution of speech, thought, and selfless behavior , 1992 .

[8]  W. Garrett Mitchener Bifurcation analysis of the fully symmetric language dynamical equation , 2003 .

[9]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  The evolutionary emergence of language : social function and the origins of linguistic form , 2000 .

[10]  Kenneth Webb,et al.  Evolution of Communication Simulation of Adaptive Behavior – Project Report , 2004 .

[11]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Language dynamics in finite populations. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Luc Steels,et al.  Spontaneous Lexicon Change , 1998, ACL.

[13]  S. Kirby,et al.  Co-Evolution of Language-Size and the Critical Period , 1998 .

[14]  Natalia L Komarova,et al.  Replicator-mutator equation, universality property and population dynamics of learning. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Parallel constraint-based generative theories of language , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  A. Monaco,et al.  A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder , 2001, Nature.

[17]  J. Batali,et al.  Innate biases and critical periods: Combining evolution and learning in the acquisition of syntax , 1994 .

[18]  M A Nowak,et al.  The evolutionary dynamics of grammar acquisition. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  S. Pinker,et al.  Natural language and natural selection , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Kenny Smith,et al.  The cultural evolution of communication in a population of neural networks , 2002, Connect. Sci..

[21]  Michael Oliphant,et al.  The Learning Barrier: Moving from Innate to Learned Systems of Communication , 1999, Adapt. Behav..

[22]  Nikolaus Ritt Towards an evolutionary theory of language , 2004 .

[23]  Igor Rivin,et al.  Harmonic mean, random polynomials and stochastic matrices , 2003, Adv. Appl. Math..

[24]  W. Fitch The evolution of speech: a comparative review , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  The Biology and Evolution of Language , 1984 .

[26]  Adrian Paterson Language as a Complex Adaptive System , 2012 .

[27]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Evolution of communication and language using signals, symbols, and words , 2001, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[28]  Luc Steels,et al.  Language games for autonomous robots , 2001 .