Adaptation is not required to explain the long-term response of axons to molecular gradients

It has been suggested that growth cones navigating through the developing nervous system might display adaptation, so that their response to gradient signals is conserved over wide variations in ligand concentration. Recently however, a new chemotaxis assay that allows the effect of gradient parameters on axonal trajectories to be finely varied has revealed a decline in gradient sensitivity on either side of an optimal concentration. We show that this behavior can be quantitatively reproduced with a computational model of axonal chemotaxis that does not employ explicit adaptation. Two crucial components of this model required to reproduce the observed sensitivity are spatial and temporal averaging. These can be interpreted as corresponding, respectively, to the spatial spread of signaling effects downstream from receptor binding, and to the finite time over which these signaling effects decay. For spatial averaging, the model predicts that an effective range of roughly one-third of the extent of the growth cone is optimal for detecting small gradient signals. For temporal decay, a timescale of about 3 minutes is required for the model to reproduce the experimentally observed sensitivity.

[1]  C. Holt,et al.  Endocytosis-dependent desensitization and protein synthesis–dependent resensitization in retinal growth cone adaptation , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Y. Rao,et al.  Signalling mechanisms mediating neuronal responses to guidance cues , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  G. Goodhill Diffusion in Axon Guidance , 1997, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  Geoffrey J. Goodhill,et al.  Predicting Axonal Response to Molecular Gradients with a Computational Model of Filopodial Dynamics , 2004, Neural Computation.

[5]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[6]  J Huf,et al.  Response of retinal ganglion cell axons to striped linear gradients of repellent guidance molecules. , 1998, Journal of neurobiology.

[7]  W. Snider,et al.  Nerve growth factor receptor trkA is down‐regulated during postnatal development by a subset of dorsal root ganglion neurons , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  I. Silos-Santiago,et al.  Neurotrophin receptor genes are expressed in distinct patterns in developing dorsal root ganglia , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  B. Dickson Molecular Mechanisms of Axon Guidance , 2002, Science.

[10]  G. Goodhill,et al.  A new chemotaxis assay shows the extreme sensitivity of axons to molecular gradients , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Dennis Bray,et al.  Cell Movements: From Molecules to Motility , 1992 .

[12]  H. Buettner,et al.  Autocorrelation function and power spectrum of two-state random processes used in neurite guidance. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[13]  G. Gallo,et al.  The trkA Receptor Mediates Growth Cone Turning toward a Localized Source of Nerve Growth Factor , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  G H Li,et al.  On the mechanisms of growth cone locomotion: modeling and computer simulation. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  D. Koshland,et al.  Amplification and adaptation in regulatory and sensory systems. , 1982, Science.

[16]  D. Bray,et al.  Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity , 1998, Nature.

[17]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  Modeling the Cell's Guidance System , 2002, Science's STKE.

[18]  A. Davies,et al.  Earliest sensory nerve fibres are guided to peripheral targets by attractants other than nerve growth factor , 1983, Nature.

[19]  C. Goodman,et al.  The Molecular Biology of Axon Guidance , 1996, Science.

[20]  Alfred Gierer,et al.  Directional cues for growing axons forming the retinotectal projection , 1987 .

[21]  C. Parent,et al.  A cell's sense of direction. , 1999, Science.

[22]  A. McMahon,et al.  The Morphogen Sonic Hedgehog Is an Axonal Chemoattractant that Collaborates with Netrin-1 in Midline Axon Guidance , 2003, Cell.

[23]  M. J. Katz How straight do axons grow? , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  Herwig Baier,et al.  Axon Guidance: Stretching Gradients to the Limit , 1998, Neural Computation.

[25]  Geoffrey J. Goodhill,et al.  Mathematical guidance for axons , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  Geoffrey J. Goodhill,et al.  Axon Guidance and Gradient Detection by Growth Cones , 2003 .

[27]  R. Lasek,et al.  Early axon patterns of the spinal cord: experiments with a computer. , 1985, Developmental biology.

[28]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[29]  H. Meinhardt Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[30]  H. Phillips,et al.  Expression of the trk family of neurotrophin receptors in developing and adult dorsal root ganglion neurons. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[31]  D. Willshaw,et al.  Short term interactions between microtubules and actin filaments underlie long term behaviour in neuronal growth cones , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Geoffrey J. Goodhill,et al.  A Theoretical Model of Axon Guidance by the Robo Code , 2003, Neural Computation.

[33]  H. Hentschel,et al.  Models of axon guidance and bundling during development , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  R. Macnab,et al.  The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  M. Poo,et al.  The cell biology of neuronal navigation , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[36]  M. Poo,et al.  Cyclic AMP/GMP-dependent modulation of Ca2+ channels sets the polarity of nerve growth-cone turning , 2003, Nature.

[37]  M. Poo,et al.  Essential role of filopodia in chemotropic turning of nerve growth cone induced by a glutamate gradient , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  E. Shooter,et al.  The nerve growth factor family of receptors , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  A. B. Huber,et al.  Signaling at the growth cone: ligand-receptor complexes and the control of axon growth and guidance. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  Mu-ming Poo,et al.  Turning of nerve growth cones induced by neurotransmitters , 1994, Nature.

[41]  J. Sweeney,et al.  Computer model: investigating role of filopodia-based steering in experimental neurite galvanotropism. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  H. Buettner Computer simulation of nerve growth cone filopodial dynamics for visualization and analysis. , 1995, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[43]  G. Goodhill,et al.  Theoretical analysis of gradient detection by growth cones. , 1999, Journal of neurobiology.

[44]  Mu-ming Poo,et al.  Adaptation in the chemotactic guidance of nerve growth cones , 2002, Nature.

[45]  H. Pearson Drug discovery: In the eye of the beholder , 2003, Nature.

[46]  S. McMahon,et al.  Postnatal Changes in the Expression of the trkA High‐affinity NGF Receptor in Primary Sensory Neurons , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[47]  E. B. George,et al.  Axonal elongation as a stochastic walk. , 1984, Cell motility.

[48]  D. Bray,et al.  Mechanical tension produced by nerve cells in tissue culture. , 1979, Journal of cell science.

[49]  H. Baier,et al.  Axon guidance by gradients of a target-derived component. , 1992, Science.

[50]  Mu-ming Poo,et al.  Signal transduction underlying growth cone guidance by diffusible factors , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[51]  Marc Tessier-Lavigne,et al.  Target attraction: Are developing axons guided by chemotropism? , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.