Challenges of IS Research Translation: a Study of Tensions between ICT Innovation and Conservative Bureaucracies

In highly-structured public bureaucracies, such as universities, the need for stable and ordered administration conflicts with attempts at innovation and creativity. This is a particular dilemma for universities, which exist to create and share knowledge. The case presented here concerns the tensions generated where a university’s administration ignored innovative IS research findings which could translate into innovations from which they could benefit. We employ Leximancer to objectively analyse textual documents related to the case and invoke Activity Theory to make deeper sense of the phenomenon of our investigation. Identifying several contractions behind the tensions uncovered in this case, we turn to the concept of dialectic as a tool for cooperatively resolving complex contradictions. The findings concern many cultural-historical factors that present barriers to the translation of IS research into innovative practice in university administration.

[1]  H. Cairns.  Plato's Theory of Law , 1942 .

[2]  G. Mueller.  The Hegel Legend of Thesia-Antithesis-Synthesis , 1958 .

[3]  L. S. Vygotksy.  Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[4]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[5]  F. Blackler.  KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[6]  Ernest Jordan,et al.  Information strategy and organization structure , 1994, Inf. Syst. J..

[7]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[8]  B. Nardi.  Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[9]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[10]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. , 2000, Ergonomics.

[11]  Gilles Paquet,et al.  E-Governance & government on-line in Canada: Partnerships, people & prospects , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  P. Eckel,et al.  The Effect of Institutional Culture on Change Strategies in Higher Education , 2002 .

[13]  David Snowden,et al.  The First Age: Information for Decision Support 1995: the Transition to the Second Age Complex Acts of Knowing: Paradox and Descriptive Self-awareness , 2022 .

[14]  Andrew E. Smith.  Automatic Extraction of Semantic Networks from Text using Leximancer , 2003, NAACL.

[15]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Codifying or enabling: the challenge of knowledge management systems , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Steve Smithson,et al.  Information systems evaluation as an organizational institution – experience from a case study , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Trust, control and the role of interorganizational systems in electronic partnerships , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[19]  J. Kallinikos.  The Social Foundations of the Bureaucratic Order , 2004 .

[20]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals , 2004, MIS Q..

[21]  R. Deem.  The Knowledge Worker, the Manager-Academic and the Contemporary UK University: New and Old Forms of Public Management? , 2004 .

[22]  S. Hewa.  Medical technology: A pandora's box? , 1994, The Journal of medical humanities.

[23]  A. Stetsenko,et al.  Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity , 2005 .

[24]  Rjoè,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work , 2005 .

[25]  V. Kaptelinin.  The Object of Activity: Making Sense of the Sense-Maker , 2005 .

[26]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Articulating knowledge work: the contributions of Activity Theory and task-based knowledge management , 2005 .

[27]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Is Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Threatened to Fall Short of its Own Principles and Possibilities as a Dialectical Social Science? , 2006, Outlines. Critical Practice Studies.

[28]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Adding Interpersonal Learning and Tacit Knowledge to March's Exploration-Exploitation Model , 2006 .

[29]  Andrew E. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[30]  Celia Whitchurch.  Who do they think they are? The changing identities of professional administrators and managers in UK higher education , 2006 .

[31]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Beyond Rigor and Relevance Towards Responsibility and Reverberation: Information Systems Research That Really Matters , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[33]  S. Horton.  New public management: its impact on public servant's identity , 2006 .

[34]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[35]  L. McCathie,et al.  Barriers to RFID Adoption in the Supply Chain , 2007, 2007 1st Annual RFID Eurasia.

[36]  G. Svensson,et al.  Are university students really customers? When illusion may lead to delusion for all! , 2007 .

[37]  V. Periyakoil.  Taming wicked problems in modern health care systems. , 2007, Journal of palliative medicine.

[38]  John P. Rice,et al.  Profiling Enterprise Risks in Large Computer Companies Using the Leximancer Software Tool , 2007 .

[39]  Hein van Duivenboden,et al.  ICT-driven innovation and the culture of public administration: A contradiction in terms? , 2008, Inf. Polity.

[40]  Ewan Ferlie,et al.  The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective , 2008 .

[41]  Peter H. Sawchuk,et al.  Sociological Understandings of Conduct for a Noncanonical Activity Theory: Exploring Intersections and Complementarities , 2008 .

[42]  María A. Rodríguez-Manzanares,et al.  Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology , 2008 .

[43]  Leping Liu,et al.  Web 2.0 Articles: Content Analysis and a Statistical Model to Predict Recognition of the Need for New Instructional Design Strategies , 2008 .

[44]  May Britt Postholm.  Cultural historical activity theory and Dewey’s idea-based social constructivism: Consequences for Educational Research , 2008, Outlines. Critical Practice Studies.

[45]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Web 2.0 Solutions to Wicked Climate Change Problems , 2009, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Andrew D. Finegan,et al.  Making Sense of Wicked Projects , 2010 .

[47]  Saedah Siraj,et al.  Information and communication technology for participatory based decision-making-E-management for administrative efficiency in Higher Education , 2010 .

[48]  Morgan Meyer.  The Rise of the Knowledge Broker , 2010 .

[49]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Blending Complexity and Activity Frameworks for a Broader and Deeper Understanding of IS , 2010, ICIS.

[50]  Dr.R. Krishnaveni,et al.  Usage of ICT for Information Administration in Higher education Institutions - A study , 2010 .

[51]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  HOW SHOULD TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE BE EXPLAINED ? A COMPARISON OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF CRITICAL REALISM AND ACTIVITY THEORY 1 , 2013 .

[52]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Understanding the Practical Relevance of Academic Research in Knowledge Management: A Lay Epistemic Theory Approach , 2013, AMCIS.

[53]  Kai Riemer,et al.  The genealogy of knowledge: introducing a tool and method for tracing the social construction of knowledge on Wikipedia , 2013 .

[54]  Rui Chen,et al.  Data Model Development for Fire Related Extreme Events: An Activity Theory Approach , 2013, MIS Q..

[55]  Sue Newell,et al.  Theorization and Translation in Information Technology Institutionalization: Evidence from Danish Home Care , 2014, MIS Q..

[56]  Clive R. Trusson,et al.  Knowledge sharing using IT service management tools: conflicting discourses and incompatible practices , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[57]  David L. Collinson,et al.  Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? , 2014 .

[58]  P. Altbach.  The emergence of a field: research and training in higher education , 2014 .

[59]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[60]  James R Cook.  Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2014 .

[61]  K. Crawford,et al.  Research Online Research Online Demonstrations of the Activity Theory Framework for Research in IS Demonstrations of the Activity Theory Framework for Research in IS , 2014 .

[62]  Jessica Fuerst,et al.  Cultural Psychology A Once And Future Discipline , 2016 .

[63]  Sebastian Köffer,et al.  Assessing the Knowledge Transfer of IS Research to Practice , 2017, AMCIS.

[64]  S. Lamb,et al.  Voices of the Mind , 2017 .