Correction of cone index for soil water content differences in a coastal plain soil

Soil penetration resistance (cone index) varies with water content. The field variation of water content could mask treatment differences. The correction of cone index data to a single water content would help prevent this. We used equations from TableCurve™ software and from the literature to correct cone indices for differences in soil water contents. Data were taken from two field experiments where cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was grown using conventional and conservation tillage without irrigation, and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were grown using conventional tillage with microirrigation. Boundary conditions based on hard, dry and soft, wet soils were imposed on the equations. Equations fit the data with coefficients of determination ranging from 0.55 to 0.92 and error mean squares from 1.37 to 6.35. After correction, cone index dependence on water content was reduced. A single-equation correction did not always fit the data across all treatments. Separate corrections, based on treatment, might be required. When corrections required multiple equations, differences may be real or may be a manifestation of the correction differences. In this case, the correction may not be feasible (unless some future work can coordinate different equations and assure a uniform correction).

[1]  Ernest W. Tollner,et al.  Lubricated and Non-Lubricated Cone Penetrometer Performance Comparison in Six Soils , 1987 .

[2]  G. W. Langdale,et al.  The effects of in-row subsoil tillage and soil water on corn yields in the southeastern coastal plain of the United States , 1984 .

[3]  J. V. Perumpral,et al.  Moisture and Density Effect on Cone Index , 1981 .

[4]  Philip J. Bauer,et al.  Winter Cover and Tillage Influences on Coastal Plain Cotton Production , 1996 .

[5]  J. Ketcheson,et al.  INFLUENCE OF SOIL BULK DENSITY AND MATRIC PRESSURE ON SOIL RESISTANCE TO PENETRATION , 1972 .

[6]  Howard M. Taylor,et al.  PENETRATION OF COTTON SEEDLINGN TAPROOTS AS INFLUENCED BY BULK DENSITY, MOISTURE CONTENT, AND STRENGTH OF SOIL , 1963 .

[7]  R. Lal,et al.  The potential restriction to root growth in structurally weak tropical soils , 1995 .

[8]  W. J. Busscher,et al.  ADJUSTMENT OF FLAT-TIPPED PENETROMETER RESISTANCE DATA TO A COMMON WATER CONTENT , 1990 .

[9]  L. N. Mielke,et al.  Estimating soil water content from soil strength , 1994 .

[10]  Thomas C. Kaspar,et al.  Soil compaction and root growth: a review , 1994 .

[11]  C. W. Doty,et al.  Simplified data analysis for an inexpensive manual analogue penetrometer , 1986 .

[12]  C. R. Camp,et al.  Effect of Mechanical Impedance on Cotton Root Growth , 1968 .

[13]  C. W. Doty,et al.  Crop Response to Chiseling and Irrigation in Soils with a Compack A2 Horizon , 1975 .

[14]  C. Shaykewich,et al.  Root penetration profiles of wheat and barley as affected by soil penetration resistance in field conditions , 1994 .

[15]  R. Lal,et al.  Effects of soil properties on the strength of weakly structured tropical soils , 1993 .

[16]  C. R. Camp,et al.  Microirrigation Management for Double-cropped Vegetables in a Humid Area , 1993 .

[17]  Spatial variability in penetration resistance of a hardsetting tropical alfisol , 1994 .

[18]  J. V. Perumpral,et al.  Cone Penetrometer Applications — A Review , 1987 .

[19]  Chris Moran,et al.  Structural change induced by wetting and drying in seedbeds of a hardsetting soil with contrasting aggregate size distribution , 1995 .

[20]  Robert Grisso,et al.  NORMALIZING CONE RESISTANCE VALUES BY CovARiANCE ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[21]  Edward McKyes,et al.  Cone Index Prediction of Compacted Soils , 1988 .

[22]  W. Busscher,et al.  The effect of texture on strength of southeastern coastal plain soils , 1986 .

[23]  C. W. Doty,et al.  RESIDUAL EFFECTS OF TILLAGE ON COASTAL PLAIN SOIL STRENGTH1 , 1986 .