The Work of IT System Developers in Context: An Organizational Case Study

The HCI community has become increasingly interested in analyzing the organizational context of systems design (e.g., Curtis, Krasner, & Iscoe, 1988). Previous work has focused on product development organizations in identifying organizational constraints on the work of system designers (Grudin, 1991b). This case study focuses on the working practices of internal system developers as they both developed a new IT system for the organization and managed the concomitant process of change. Here the organizational context (in terms of shared beliefs, politics and inter- and intragroup relations) is seen as informing both the manner in which the project was conducted and, to some extent, the customization of the product. The role of internal system developers as organizational change agents is highlighted, with emphasis on their image management and political strategies in effecting change.

[1]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Customer-developer links in software development , 1995, CACM.

[2]  John M. Bowers.  The Janus faces of design: some critical questions for CSCW , 1990 .

[3]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[4]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Participative systems design: practice and theory , 1983 .

[5]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Information systems and organizational change , 1990, CACM.

[6]  G. Johnson.  Managing Strategic Change; The Role of Symbolic Action , 1990 .

[7]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design: an emergent view of system design , 1990, CHI '90.

[8]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Inside a software design team: knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration , 1993, CACM.

[9]  Gerhard Schmidt,et al.  Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  A cross-cultural comparison of IS designer values , 1990, CACM.

[11]  C. R. Franz,et al.  Group process and conflict in system development , 1989 .

[12]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  Making Sense of Organizational Symbolism@@@Organizational Symbolism (Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations, Vol. 1). , 1985 .

[13]  David Lorge Parnas,et al.  A Rational Design Process: How and Why to Fake It , 1985, TAPSOFT, Vol.2.

[14]  Michael Newman,et al.  INTEGRATED SYSTEM, AUTONOMOUS DEPARTMENTS: ORGANIZATIONAL INVALIDITY AND SYSTEM CHANGE IN A UNIVERSITY* , 1993 .

[15]  B. Crabtree,et al.  A Template Approach to Text Analysis: Developing and Using Codebooks , 1992 .

[16]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[17]  Raymonde Guindon.  Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts , 1990 .

[18]  John R. Wilson.  Participation-A framework and a foundation for ergonomics? , 1991 .

[19]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Organizational obstacles to interface design and development: two participant-observer studies , 1994, TCHI.

[20]  H. Rosenbrock,et al.  Engineers and the Work That People Do , 1981, Technology and Society.

[21]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Systematic Sources of Suboptimal Interface Design in Large Product Development Organizations , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Rituals in Information System Design , 1984, MIS Q..

[23]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Stress in software development: User representatives pay for user participation , 1993 .

[24]  David Boddy,et al.  The expertise of the change agent: Public performance and backstage activity , 1992 .

[25]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Back to thinking mode: diaries for the management of information systems development projects , 1989 .

[26]  Bob Anderson,et al.  Supporting The Design Process Within An Organisational Context , 1993, ECSCW.

[27]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[28]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[29]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[30]  A. Pettigrew.  The Awakening Giant , 1985 .

[31]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1986 POWER OVER USERS : ITS EXERCISE BY SYSTEM PROFESSIONALS , 2017 .

[32]  James Cornford,et al.  Computer Systems Development: History, organization and implementation , 1990 .

[33]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Creating Conditions for Participation: Conflicts and Resources in Systems Development , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Graham Button,et al.  Published in: Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology, , 2022 .

[35]  E. Schein.  Three Cultures of Management: The Key to Organizational Learning , 1996 .

[36]  Johannes Gärtner,et al.  Mapping Actors and Agendas: Political Frameworks of Systems Design and Participation , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[37]  V. Mosco.  Computers and Democracy , 1990 .

[38]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[39]  G. Symon.  Qualitative research diaries. , 1998 .

[40]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Small Group Design Meetings: An Analysis of Collaboration , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[41]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Change Agentry - The Next IS Frontier , 1996, MIS Q..

[42]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Interactive systems: bridging the gaps between developers and users , 1991, Computer.