Cytotoxicity evaluation of three resin-based sealers on an L929 cell line

Background: Endodontic sealers usually come in contact with adjacent tissues and their biocompatibility is key in a successful treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the cytotoxicity of three resin-based sealers, namely AH Plus, EndoREZ, and Epiphany in set and fresh states on an L929 cell line. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, the materials were mixed according to the manufacturers’ instructions, and were divided into two groups, fresh and set. The elutes of materials were prepared separately and were incubated with L929 fibroblasts for 1 hour, 24 hours, and 72 hours. Pulp Canal Sealer and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) served as positive and negative controls respectively. Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay ([3-4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide succinate), after 1 hour, 24 hours, and 72 hours. The data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey multiple comparison test. Results: After 1 hour, fresh Epiphany and fresh AH Plus were significantly more cytotoxic than their set samples. No significant difference was perceived between cytotoxicity of fresh state of sealers and positive control, or between set state and negative control. After 24 hours, both fresh and set samples of all materials were significantly more cytotoxic than the negative control group, and were less cytotoxic than the positive control group. After 72 hours, the fresh and set samples of all materials were as cytotoxic as the positive control group. At each time point, no significant difference was perceived among different materials in terms of cell viability. Conclusion: The observed differences among the cytotoxicity of AH Plus, EndoREZ, and Epiphany did not reach a significant level at comparable time points after exposure.

[1]  M. J. Kharazifar,et al.  Comparison of cell viability and morphology of a human osteoblast-like cell line (SaOS-2) seeded on various bone substitute materials: An in vitro study , 2012, Dental research journal.

[2]  S. Mousavinasab Biocompatibility of composite resins , 2011, Dental research journal.

[3]  F. Şahin,et al.  Cytotoxicity of 5 endodontic sealers on L929 cell line and human dental pulp cells. , 2011, International endodontic journal.

[4]  Chen-Ying Wang,et al.  A novel urethane acrylate-based root canal sealer with improved degree of conversion, cytotoxicity, bond strengths, solubility, and dimensional stability. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  H. Darmani,et al.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of various resin based root canal sealers. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[6]  L. Ye,et al.  Cytotoxicity of RealSeal on human osteoblast-like MG63 cells. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  A. Marques,et al.  Biocompatibility evaluation of Epiphany/Resilon root canal filling system in subcutaneous tissue of rats. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  K. Hiller,et al.  The induction of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and genotoxicity by root canal sealers in mammalian cells. , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[9]  D. Pashley,et al.  Contemporary methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers exhibit different degrees of ex vivo cytotoxicity when cured in their self-cured mode. , 2009, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  M. Brackett,et al.  Cytotoxicity of endodontic materials over 6-weeks ex vivo. , 2008, International endodontic journal.

[11]  F. Tay,et al.  In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of a self-adhesive, methacrylate resin-based root canal sealer. , 2008, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  M. Aminozarbian,et al.  Histopathologic Evaluation of the Subcutaneous Tissue Response to Three Endodontic Sealers , 2008 .

[13]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  Toxicity evaluation of root canal sealers in vitro. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[14]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  Cytotoxicity of new resin-, calcium hydroxide- and silicone-based root canal sealers on fibroblasts derived from human gingiva and L929 cell lines. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[15]  S. Friedman,et al.  Short-term cytotoxicity assessment of components of the epiphany resin-percha obturating system by indirect and direct contact millipore filter assays. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  F. Tay,et al.  Initial in vitro biological response to contemporary endodontic sealers. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[17]  M. Sousa-Neto,et al.  A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH PlusTM and EpiphanyTM root canal sealants , 2006 .

[18]  J. Baumgartner,et al.  Setting times of Resilon and other sealers in aerobic and anaerobic environments. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  A. Gluskin Mishaps and serious complications in endodontic obturation , 2005 .

[20]  C. Kao,et al.  Root canal sealers induce cytotoxicity and necrosis , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[21]  J. Wataha,et al.  Cytotoxicity and sealing properties of four classes of endodontic sealers evaluated by succinic dehydrogenase activity and confocal laser scanning microscopy. , 2004, European journal of oral sciences.

[22]  J. Szabó,et al.  Tissue reaction initiated by different sealers. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[23]  A. Kalayci,et al.  A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of two root canal sealers. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[24]  J. Wataha,et al.  In vitro biological response to core and flowable dental restorative materials. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[25]  G. Leyhausen,et al.  The cellular compatibility of five endodontic sealers during the setting period. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[26]  M. Chou,et al.  Cytotoxicity of resin-, zinc oxide-eugenol-, and calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells and permanent V79 cells. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[27]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  Clinical performance of 3 endodontic sealers. , 2001, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[28]  W. Geurtsen Biocompatibility of root canal filling materials. , 2001, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[29]  S. Hikage,et al.  Cytotoxicity of dental resin monomers in the presence of S9 mix enzymes. , 1999, Dental materials journal.

[30]  B. Musikant,et al.  Formaldehyde evaluation from endodontic materials. , 1998, Oral health.

[31]  G. Leyhausen,et al.  Biological aspects of root canal filling materials – histocompatibility, cytotoxicity, and mutagenicity , 1997, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[32]  J. E. Leonard,et al.  Apical and coronal seal of roots obturated with a dentine bonding agent and resin. , 1996, International endodontic journal.

[33]  G. Cavalleri,et al.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of six root canal sealers. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[34]  L. Spångberg,et al.  Cytotoxicity of some modified root canal sealers and their leachable components. , 1993, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[35]  G. Caughman,et al.  Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites. , 1991, Biomaterials.