A spectrum-driven damage identification by minimum constitutive relation error and sparse regularization

Abstract This paper proposes a novel model-based damage identification strategy based on minimum constitutive relation error and sparse regularization using the power spectrum density data. Firstly, the stationary random vibration problem is transformed into a series of harmonic vibrations by the pseudo excitation method and the error in constitutive relation is established by the admissible stress field and admissible displacement field. A much more general and simpler strategy so as to build the admissible stress field is addressed by requiring only an extra decomposition of the stiffness matrix. Then, the sparse regularization is added to the original constitutive relation error objective function to circumvent the ill-posedness of the inverse problem. Finally, the solution of this nonlinear optimization problem is solved by the alternating minimization method. The proposed method has the advantage that only measurement power spectrum density data from few limited sensors are needed in the inverse analysis. Numerical and experimental results show the effectiveness and robustness of this approach.

[1]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  An experimental validation of time domain system identification methods with fusion of heterogeneous data , 2015 .

[2]  Amir Beck,et al.  On the Convergence of Alternating Minimization for Convex Programming with Applications to Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares and Decomposition Schemes , 2015, SIAM J. Optim..

[3]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) , 2011 .

[4]  Eric Florentin,et al.  Identification of the parameters of an elastic material model using the constitutive equation gap method , 2010 .

[5]  Jiahao Lin,et al.  Structural responses to arbitrarily coherent stationary random excitations , 1994 .

[6]  Hamid Ahmadian,et al.  Generic element matrices suitable for finite element model updating , 1995 .

[7]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Modal‐based structural damage identification by minimum constitutive relation error and sparse regularization , 2018, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[8]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Fully nonstationary analytical earthquake ground-motion model , 1997 .

[9]  Li Wang,et al.  An enhanced response sensitivity approach for structural damage identification: convergence and performance , 2017 .

[10]  A. Kiureghian.  A response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of mdf systems , 1981 .

[11]  Jiahao Lin,et al.  Accurate and highly efficient algorithms for structural stationary/non-stationary random responses , 2001 .

[12]  M. Bonnet,et al.  Overview of Identification Methods of Mechanical Parameters Based on Full-field Measurements , 2008 .

[13]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Structural damage identification based on power spectral density sensitivity analysis of dynamic responses , 2015 .

[14]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Component mode synthesis techniques for finite element model updating , 2013 .

[15]  Sebastien Le Loch,et al.  Validation and updating of industrial models based on the constitutive relation error , 2004 .

[16]  Pierre Villon,et al.  Robust identification of elastic properties using the Modified Constitutive Relation Error , 2015 .

[17]  Bertrand Wattrisse,et al.  Elastoplastic Behavior Identification for Heterogeneous Loadings and Materials , 2008 .

[18]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Frequency response-based damage identification in frames by minimum constitutive relation error and sparse regularization , 2019, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[19]  Li Wang,et al.  Sensitivity-free damage identification based on incomplete modal data, sparse regularization and alternating minimization approach , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[20]  Pierre Ladevèze,et al.  Reduced bases for model updating in structural dynamics based on constitutive relation error , 2002 .

[21]  Eric M. Hernandez,et al.  Identification of isolated structural damage from incomplete spectrum information using l1-norm minimization , 2014 .

[22]  Bart De Moor,et al.  N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems , 1994, Autom..

[23]  Stéphane Pagano,et al.  Identification of Mechanical Properties by Displacement Field Measurement: A Variational Approach , 2003 .

[24]  Sanjaya Kumar Patro,et al.  Vibration-based damage detection techniques used for health monitoring of structures: a review , 2016 .

[25]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Nonlinear finite element model updating for damage identification of civil structures using batch Bayesian estimation , 2017 .

[26]  Pierre Villon,et al.  Modified constitutive relation error: An identification framework dealing with the reliability of information , 2016 .

[27]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  The unscented Kalman filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non‐collocated heterogeneous sensing , 2009 .

[28]  S. S. Law,et al.  Features of dynamic response sensitivity and its application in damage detection , 2007 .

[29]  Alessandro De Stefano,et al.  Vibration-based monitoring of civil infrastructure: challenges and successes , 2011 .

[30]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  A spectrum-driven damage identification technique: Application and validation through the numerical simulation of the Z24 Bridge , 2016 .

[31]  Jiahao Lin,et al.  Pseudo-excitation algorithm for nonstationary random seismic responses , 1994 .

[32]  Samit Ray-Chaudhuri,et al.  Fundamental mode shape and its derivatives in structural damage localization , 2013 .