Evaluation of the performance of vehicle-to-vehicle applications in an urban network

ABSTRACT Connected vehicle (CV) technology has the potential to improve safety and mobility in local and wide-area traffic management. It is necessary to measure the effects of CV applications on large and realistic networks because most of the published research in this area focus on simple hypothetical networks. In contrast, this article measures the performance of vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) applications and determines the required minimum level of deployment for V2V applications in a large urban network. The information propagation distance and the speed estimation error are used as bases for measuring the performance of an event-driven and periodic application of equipped vehicles with different market penetration rates and different wireless communication coverage. As the wireless communication coverage and market penetration rates of the equipped vehicles increase, the information propagation distance increases whereas the speed estimation error decreases in our study area. For event-driven applications, the major factor is wireless communication coverage because it has a greater impact on the distance of information propagation than market penetration of the equipped vehicles does. However, the market penetration rate has a greater impact on the performance of periodic applications than wireless communication coverage does. The performance of event-driven applications improves in peak traffic times, which have high traffic-density conditions; whereas the performance of periodic applications improves in non-peak times, which have low traffic-density conditions. The minimum level of deployment needed for each application to obtain reliable traffic management solutions is determined. These study findings will be useful in the deployment of CV applications.

[1]  Brian Lee Smith,et al.  Microscopic Estimation of Arterial Vehicle Positions in a Low-Penetration-Rate Connected Vehicle Environment , 2014 .

[2]  Wei Yin,et al.  Implementation and Testing of Cooperative Bus Priority System in Connected Vehicle Environment , 2014 .

[3]  Byungkyu Park,et al.  Transit Signal Priority with Connected Vehicle Technology , 2014 .

[4]  Hoe-Kyoung Kim A Simulation-Based Investigation of an Advanced Traveler Information System with V2V in Urban Network , 2011 .

[5]  Byungkyu Brian Park,et al.  Microscopic Estimation of Freeway Vehicle Positions From the Behavior of Connected Vehicles , 2014, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[6]  Antoine G. Hobeika,et al.  Travelers’ Response to Value Pricing: Application of Departure Time Choices to TRANSIMS , 2010 .

[7]  A. G. Hobeika,et al.  Assessment of certain applications of Vehicle-to-Vehicle communication in an urban network , 2014 .

[8]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Estimation of measures of effectiveness based on Connected Vehicle data , 2011, 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[9]  Meng Li,et al.  Application of Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Data on Real-Time Arterial Performance Measurements , 2008 .

[10]  Javier A. Barria,et al.  Detection and Classification of Traffic Anomalies Using Microscopic Traffic Variables , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Assessing the Potential Impacts of Connected Vehicles: Mobility, Environmental, and Safety Perspectives , 2016, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[12]  Antoine G. Hobeika,et al.  Application of Dynamic Value Pricing through Enhancements to TRANSIMS , 2007 .

[13]  Taehyung Kim,et al.  Capability-Enhanced Probe Vehicle Surveillance System with Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications , 2010 .

[14]  Mustafa Ergen,et al.  Dependence of Cooperative Vehicle System Performance on Market Penetration , 2007 .

[15]  Wei Wang,et al.  Accuracy Analysis of Freeway Traffic Speed Estimation Based on the Integration of Cellular Probe System and Loop Detectors , 2015, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[16]  Guizhen Yu,et al.  Study of Probe Sample Size Model in Probe Vehicle Technology , 2007 .

[17]  Amelia C. Regan,et al.  An Empirical Study of Inter-Vehicle Communication Performance Using NS-2 , 2010 .

[18]  Xu Yang,et al.  Simulation studies of information propagation in a self-organizing distributed traffic information system , 2005 .

[19]  Wen-Long Jin,et al.  Broadcasting safety information in vehicular networks: issues and approaches , 2010, IEEE Network.

[20]  Cheol Oh,et al.  Estimation of Lane-Level Travel Times in Vehicle-to-Vehicle and Vehicle-to-Infrastructure–Based Traffic Information System , 2011 .

[21]  Jae-Joon Lee,et al.  Simulation Model for Studying Impact of Vehicle-to-Vehicle Wireless Communications on Traffic Network Operations , 2010 .

[22]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Estimating Queue Length under Connected Vehicle Technology , 2013 .

[23]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Arterial Queue Spillback Detection and Signal Control Based on Connected Vehicle Technology , 2013 .

[24]  S. Travis Waller,et al.  A static network level model for the information propagation in vehicular ad hoc networks , 2010 .

[25]  Mustafa Ergen,et al.  Critical penetration for vehicular networks , 2010, IEEE Communications Letters.