Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing.

PURPOSE The effect of image processing, specifically Bayesian image estimation (BIE), on digital mammographic images is studied. BIE is an iterative, nonlinear statistical estimation technique that has previously been used in chest radiography to reduce image scatter content and improve the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). We adapt this technique to digital mammography and examine its effect. METHODS/MATERIALS Images of the American College of Radiologists (ACR) breast phantom were acquired on a calibrated digital mammography system at a normal mammographic exposure both with and without a grid. An iterative Bayesian estimation algorithm was formulated and used to process the images acquired without a grid. Quantitative scatter fractions were measured and compared for the image acquired with the grid, the image acquired without the grid, and the image acquired without the grid and processed by the Bayesian algorithm. CNR values were also computed for the four visible masses in the ACR phantom before and after processing and compared to a grid. RESULTS Initial images acquired without an antiscatter grid had scatter fractions of 0.46. Processing this image with BIE reduced the scatter content to under 0.04. In comparison, the image acquired with a grid had scatter of 0.19. BIE processing accounted for CNR improvements from 29% to 219% for the masses seen in the ACR phantom as compared to the unprocessed image. Visibility of the four masses in the phantom was improved. CONCLUSIONS Bayesian image estimation can be used with digital mammography to reduce scatter fractions. This technique is very useful as it can reduce scatter content effectively without introducing any adverse effects, such as grid line aliasing. Bayesian processing can also increase image CNR, which may potentially increase the visualization of subtle masses. Preliminary work shows an improvement in CNR to values greater than that provided by a standard grid.

[1]  M L Giger,et al.  Application of the EM algorithm to radiographic images. , 1992, Medical physics.

[2]  J A Seibert,et al.  Characterization of the point spread function and modulation transfer function of scattered radiation using a digital imaging system. , 1986, Medical physics.

[3]  H P Chan,et al.  Exposure equalization technique in mammography. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[4]  K Doi,et al.  Digital Mammography: ROC Studies of the Effects of Pixel Size and Unsharp-Mask Filtering on the Detection of Subtle Microcalcifications , 1987 .

[5]  G. Fagerberg,et al.  Image Quality in Mammography with Special Reference to Anti-Scatter Grids and the Magnification Technique , 1986, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[6]  S. C. Prasad,et al.  Scatter reduction in mammography with air gap. , 1996, Medical physics.

[7]  Chin-Tu Chen,et al.  A Simplified EM Reconstruction Algorithm for TOFPET , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  R. Kruger,et al.  Scatter estimation for a digital radiographic system using convolution filtering. , 1987, Medical physics.

[10]  D R Dance,et al.  The computation of scatter in mammography by Monte Carlo methods. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  A Fenster,et al.  Dual-energy mammography: initial experimental results. , 1985, Medical physics.

[12]  H Bernstein,et al.  Experimental and theoretical energy and angular dependencies of scattered radiation in the mammography energy range. , 1983, Medical physics.

[13]  A H Baydush,et al.  Bayesian image estimation of digital chest radiography: interdependence of noise, resolution, and scatter fraction. , 1995, Medical physics.

[14]  Jay F. Cook,et al.  Selective digital enhancement of conventional film mammography , 1994, Journal of surgical oncology.

[15]  A H Baydush,et al.  Spatially varying Bayesian image estimation. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[16]  G S Shaber,et al.  Dual-energy mammography: a detector analysis. , 1990, Medical physics.

[17]  A Fenster,et al.  Scanned-projection digital mammography. , 1987, Medical physics.

[18]  M A King,et al.  Experimental measurements of the scatter reduction obtained in mammography with a scanning multiple slit assembly. , 1981, Medical physics.

[19]  I Andersson,et al.  Chapter IV. Reduced breast‐cancer mortality with mammography screening‐an assessment of currently available data , 1990, International journal of cancer. Supplement = Journal international du cancer. Supplement.

[20]  J E Bowsher,et al.  Scatter Compensation for Digital Chest Radiography Using Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[21]  A R Cowen,et al.  A clinical comparison between conventional and digital mammography utilizing computed radiography. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  R. C. Murry,et al.  Christensen’s Introduction to the Physics of Diagnostic Radiology , 1986 .

[23]  T. Hebert,et al.  A generalized EM algorithm for 3-D Bayesian reconstruction from Poisson data using Gibbs priors. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[24]  S. Wall,et al.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials , 1993, The Lancet.

[25]  Thiele Dl,et al.  Scatter radiation in mammography. , 1993 .

[26]  H Bernstein,et al.  An approach to specifying a minimum dose system for mammography using multiparameter optimization techniques. , 1985, Medical physics.

[27]  Jun Wang,et al.  Film digitization aliasing artifacts caused by grid line patterns , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[28]  G T Barnes,et al.  Contrast and scatter in x-ray imaging. , 1991, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[29]  A H Baydush,et al.  Improved Bayesian image estimation for digital chest radiography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[30]  E. Muntz,et al.  Focal spot size and scatter suppression in magnification mammography. , 1979, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  R Fahrig,et al.  Performance of glass fiber antiscatter devices at mammographic energies. , 1994, Medical physics.

[32]  T. Tong,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1994 , 1994, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[33]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[34]  C J Thompson,et al.  Feasibility study for positron emission mammography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[35]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: optimal spectra for digital mammography. , 1996, Medical physics.

[36]  H Bernstein,et al.  Experimental verification of a technique for predicting scattered radiation transfer: application to low photon energies. , 1986, Medical physics.

[37]  S Shapiro,et al.  Screening: Assessment of current studies , 1994, Cancer.

[38]  C E Floyd,et al.  Bayesian Restoration of Chest Radiographs: Scatter Compensation with Improved Signal–to–Noise Ratio , 1994, Investigative radiology.