Comparing Waste-to-Energy technologies by applying energy system analysis.

Even when policies of waste prevention, re-use and recycling are prioritised, a fraction of waste will still be left which can be used for energy recovery. This article asks the question: How to utilise waste for energy in the best way seen from an energy system perspective? Eight different Waste-to-Energy technologies are compared with a focus on fuel efficiency, CO(2) reductions and costs. The comparison is carried out by conducting detailed energy system analyses of the present as well as a potential future Danish energy system with a large share of combined heat and power as well as wind power. The study shows potential of using waste for the production of transport fuels. Biogas and thermal gasification technologies are hence interesting alternatives to waste incineration and it is recommended to support the use of biogas based on manure and organic waste. It is also recommended to support research into gasification of waste without the addition of coal and biomass. Together the two solutions may contribute to alternate use of one third of the waste which is currently incinerated. The remaining fractions should still be incinerated with priority to combined heat and power plants with high electric efficiency.

[1]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fuels for district heating: A comparison of waste incineration, biomass- and natural gas combustion , 2007 .

[2]  Maria Macchiato,et al.  Waste management system optimisation for Southern Italy with MARKAL model , 2002 .

[3]  Dag Henning,et al.  Comparison between material and energy recovery of municipal waste from an energy perspective: A study of two Swedish municipalities , 2004 .

[4]  F. Goudnaan,et al.  Thermal Efficiency of the HTU® Process for Biomass Liquefaction , 2008 .

[5]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  Key methodological issues for life cycle inventory analysis of paper recycling , 1999 .

[6]  N. Duić,et al.  Two energy system analysis models: A comparison of methodologies and results , 2007 .

[7]  M Horttanainen,et al.  Co-generation based energy recovery from municipal solid waste integrated with the existing energy supply system. , 2008, Waste management.

[8]  Henrik Lund,et al.  Modelling of energy systems with a high percentage of CHP and wind power , 2003 .

[9]  Henrik Lund,et al.  Integrated energy systems and local energy markets , 2006 .

[10]  Anthony V. Bridgwater,et al.  Progress in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion , 2001 .

[11]  B. Mathiesen.  Fuel cells and electrolysers in future energy systems , 2008 .

[12]  Maria Ljunggren Söderman,et al.  Recovering energy from waste in Sweden: a systems engineering study , 2003 .

[13]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Environmental and economic assessment methods for waste management decision-support: possibilities and limitations , 2007, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[14]  Elbert Dijkgraaf,et al.  Burn or Bury? A Social Cost Comparison of Final Waste Disposal Methods , 2003 .

[15]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Flexible and robust strategies for waste management in Sweden. , 2007, Waste management.

[16]  A J Morrissey,et al.  Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. , 2004, Waste management.

[17]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Methodological aspects of life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management systems , 1999 .

[18]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  Effects of planned expansion of waste incineration in the Swedish district heating systems , 2004 .

[19]  Ofira Ayalon,et al.  A critical review of economic valuation studies of externalities from incineration and landfilling , 2005, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[20]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Integration of renewable energy into the transport and electricity sectors through V2G , 2008 .

[21]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment of urban waste management: energy performances and environmental impacts. The case of Rome, Italy. , 2008, Waste management.

[22]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  Energy system analysis of 100% renewable energy systems-The case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050 , 2009 .

[23]  Maria Macchiato,et al.  Waste management modeling by MARKAL model: A case study for Basilicata Region , 2000 .

[24]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide , 2006 .

[25]  Jan Stenis,et al.  Application of the WAMED model to landfilling , 2008 .

[26]  Stephan Moll,et al.  Assessment of information related to waste and material flows. A catalogue of methods and tools , 2003 .

[27]  Brian Elmegaard,et al.  Optimal operation strategies of compressed air energy storage (CAES) on electricity spot markets with fluctuating prices , 2009 .

[28]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  HEATSPOT—a simulation tool for national district heating analyses , 2006 .

[29]  Marie Münster,et al.  Use of waste for heat, electricity and transport—Challenges when performing energy system analysis , 2009 .

[30]  Henrik Lund,et al.  Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development , 2007 .

[31]  Janus T Kirkeby,et al.  Evaluation of environmental impacts from municipal solid waste management in the municipality of Aarhus, Denmark (EASEWASTE) , 2006, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.