The Next Generation Network (NGN) architecture is evolving into a highly heterogeneous infrastructure composed of a variety of Wireless Access Technologies (WAT). In such a technologically diverse network; one of the key challenges would be to ensure ubiquitous communication services to mobile entities, with varying mobility patterns and speed, irrespective of their location and/or the underlying WAT. This calls for devising efficient mobility management solutions that would provide location management and handover management services to mobile entities. The location management service is responsible for keeping track of the location of the mobile entities whereas the handover management service enables the mobile entity to change its point of connection in the Internet. The essential mandate of any efficient mobility management solution is to provide effective and fast location monitoring and updating services while enabling seamless inter-WAT handover. The notion of seamless handover implies handovers with minimum latency and packet losses. Providing seamless handover is an imposing challenge because the location update takes place after the successful execution of the handover. The handover process is executed at both the data link layer (L2) and at the network layer (L3) based on prescribed rules at these respective layers. The L2 handover process enables the mobile node (MN) to switch its link connectivity from its serving access point (AP) or base station to the new one. After successfully establishing link connectivity, the MN will then need to perform L3 handover process to make the MN IP capable on the new link. Till the completion of the handover, the MN is practically disconnected from the network resulting in loss of data. The amount of data lost depends on the handover latency, which in turn is a sum of delay incurred by handover procedure prescribed at L2 and L3 respectively. This implies that the latency of the L3 handover process is directly dependent on the latency of the L2 handover process and also on the timing of the provisioning of L2 triggers that will initiate the L3 handover process. Thus to develop seamless handover methodology, it is important to take into account the effect of L2 handover process on the L3 specified handover operations. This calls for devising cross-layer mobility management solution that will enable inter-layer communication 28
[1]
Dario Di Sorte,et al.
Performance evaluation of the push-mode-multicast based candidate access router discovery (PMM CARD)
,
2006,
Comput. Networks.
[2]
Richard Gitlin,et al.
Fast Handoff Using Neighbor Information
,
2000
.
[3]
Charles E. Perkins,et al.
Mobility support in IPv6
,
1996,
MobiCom '96.
[4]
Christian Wietfeld,et al.
Multi-hop discovery of Candidate Access Routers (MHD-CAR) for fast moving mobile nodes
,
2008,
2008 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.
[5]
Young-Joo Suh,et al.
Access router information protocol with FMIPv6 for efficient handovers and their implementations
,
2005,
GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..
[6]
Qiaobing Xie,et al.
Mobility using IEEE 802.21 in a heterogeneous IEEE 802.16/802.11-based, IMT-advanced (4G) network
,
2008,
IEEE Wireless Communications.
[7]
Thomas Narten,et al.
Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6
,
1998
.
[8]
T. Fujii,et al.
A study on autonomous neighbor access router discovery for mobile IP
,
2003,
The 57th IEEE Semiannual Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003. VTC 2003-Spring..
[9]
Christian Wietfeld,et al.
An accurate and extensible mobile IPv6 (xMIPV6) simulation model for OMNeT
,
2008,
Simutools 2008.
[10]
Thomas Narten,et al.
IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration
,
1996,
RFC.
[11]
Thomas Narten,et al.
Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)
,
1996,
RFC.
[12]
Rajeev Koodli,et al.
Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers
,
2008,
RFC.
[13]
Sung-Jea Ko,et al.
Selective Channel Scanning for Fast Handoff in Wireless LAN Using Neighbor Graph
,
2004,
PWC.
[14]
William A. Arbaugh,et al.
An empirical analysis of the IEEE 802.11 MAC layer handoff process
,
2003,
CCRV.
[15]
Haitao Wu,et al.
Proactive Scan: Fast Handoff with Smart Triggers for 802.11 Wireless LAN
,
2007,
IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.
[16]
Dario Di Sorte,et al.
Target access router selection in advanced mobility scenarios
,
2006,
Comput. Commun..
[17]
Nikos I. Passas,et al.
Media-independent handover for seamless service provision in heterogeneous networks
,
2008,
IEEE Communications Magazine.