Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markov random field model

Clustered microcalcifcations (MCs) in digitized mammograms has been widely recognized as an early sign of breast cancer in women. This work is devoted to developing a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for the detection of MCs in digital mammograms. Such a task actually involves two key issues: detection of suspicious MCs and recognition of true MCs. Accordingly, our approach is divided into two stages. At first, all suspicious MCs are preserved by thresholding a filtered mammogram via a wavelet filter according to the MPV (mean pixel value) of that image. Subsequently, Markov random field parameters based on the Derin-Elliott model are extracted from the neighborhood of every suspicious MCs as the primary texture features. The primary features combined with three auxiliary texture quantities serve as inputs to classifiers for the recognition of true MCs so as to decrease the false positive rate. Both Bayes classifier and back-propagation neural network were used for computer experiments. The data used to test this method were 20 mammograms containing 25 areas of clustered MCs marked by radiologists. Our method can readily remove 1341 false positives out of 1356, namely, 98.9% false positives were removed. Additionally, the sensitivity (true positives rate) is 92%, with only 0.75 false positives per image. From our experiments, we conclude that, with a proper choice of classifier, the texture feature based on Markov random field parameters combined with properly designed auxiliary features extracted from the texture context of the MCs can work outstandingly in the recognition of MCs in digital mammograms.

[1]  Dong-Ming Zhao Rule-based morphological feature extraction of microcalcifications in mammograms , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Haluk Derin,et al.  Modeling and Segmentation of Noisy and Textured Images Using Gibbs Random Fields , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Anil K. Jain Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[4]  Baoyu Zheng,et al.  Digital mammography: mixed feature neural network with spectral entropy decision for detection of microcalcifications , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[5]  J. Besag Statistical Analysis of Non-Lattice Data , 1975 .

[6]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis , 2001, Computer Science Workbench.

[7]  A. Grossmann,et al.  DECOMPOSITION OF HARDY FUNCTIONS INTO SQUARE INTEGRABLE WAVELETS OF CONSTANT SHAPE , 1984 .

[8]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Dongming Zhao,et al.  Morphology on detection of calcifications in mammograms , 1992, [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[10]  Nicolaos B. Karayiannis,et al.  Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  R M Rangayyan,et al.  Feature enhancement of film mammograms using fixed and adaptive neighborhoods. , 1984, Applied optics.

[12]  S. Mallat Multiresolution approximations and wavelet orthonormal bases of L^2(R) , 1989 .

[13]  Haluk Derin,et al.  A new approach to parameter estimation for Gibbs random fields , 1985, ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[14]  Robin N. Strickland,et al.  Wavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[15]  H. Derin,et al.  Segmentation of textured images using Gibbs random fields , 1986 .

[16]  Ling Guan,et al.  A CAD System for the Automatic Detection of Clustered Microcalcification in Digitized Mammogram Films , 2000, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[17]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[18]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Region-based contrast enhancement of mammograms , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[19]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[20]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[22]  Nikolas P. Galatsanos,et al.  A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Carmen Olga Acuna,et al.  Texture modeling using Gibbs distributions , 1992, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[24]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[25]  J. Hammersley,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods , 1965 .

[26]  Gerhard Winkler,et al.  Image analysis, random fields and dynamic Monte Carlo methods: a mathematical introduction , 1995, Applications of mathematics.

[27]  John Håkon Husøy,et al.  Optimal filter-based detection of microcalcifications , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  S. Lai,et al.  On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.